journal article·2018-01

Optimized performance of the integrated hepatic cell‐loaded cryogel‐based bioreactor with intermittent perfusion of acute liver failure plasma

Apeksha Damania, Anupam Kumar, Shiv K. Sarin, Ashok Kumar

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Acute liver failure (ALF) plasma has cytotoxic effects on the cell‐loaded bioreactor in bioartificial liver support systems due to the presence of innumerable hepatotoxic compounds that adversely affect the morphology and functionality of the cells. We have designed a hybrid bioreactor that integrates a hepatic cell‐loaded cryogel disc and an activated carbon cloth in one compact unit, with potential application as a bioartificial liver support. In this article, we assess the performance of this integrated hybrid cryogel‐based bioreactor in a perfusion‐based culture system and analyze its functionality and longevity in the presence of intermittent exposure to ALF plasma. The bioreactor maintained functionality in terms of glucose consumption and albumin synthesis for up to 40 days under perfusion. Additionally, intermittent perfusion of plasma from rodent models of ALF resulted in a decrease in viability and functionality only after the second spike of plasma, with the bioreactor maintaining its functionality even after the first spike. Similar results were obtained with patient plasma indicating the potential to reuse the bioreactor for multiple sessions of liver dialysis. Collectively, these results suggest the potential of the integrated cryogel‐based bioreactor to be used at most twice before being disposed of. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 259–269, 2018.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pancreatic function and diabetes · Liver physiology and pathology · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur 208016 UP India

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS) New Delhi India

Funding

Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1053/jhep.2001.2675310.1053/jhep.2001.26753 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cld.2014.07.01110.1016/j.cld.2014.07.011 ↗
3. Concise review: Liver regenerative medicine: from hepatocyte transplantation to bioartificial livers and bioengineered grafts10.1002/stem.2500 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00534020009510.1007/s005340200095 ↗
5. Evaluation of polypropylene hollow‐fiber prototype bioreactor for bioartificial liver10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0332 ↗
6. Development and validation of a bioartificial liver device with fluidized bed bioreactors hosting alginate‐encapsulated hepatocyte spheroids
7. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.02110.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.021 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.10.01210.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.10.012 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12072-013-9503-710.1007/s12072-013-9503-7 ↗
10. The effect of rat acute‐liver‐failure plasma on HepaRG cells10.1177/039139881203501106 ↗
11. 10.1177/03913988020250101110.1177/039139880202501011 ↗
12. 10.1177/03913988040270040610.1177/039139880402700406 ↗
13. 10.1111/liv.1209010.1111/liv.12090 ↗
14. The cytotoxicity of plasma from patients with acute hepatic failure to isolated rabbit hepatocytes
15. 10.1002/jbm.b.3347510.1002/jbm.b.33475 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep4032310.1038/srep40323 ↗
17. Concise review: 3D cell culture systems for anticancer drug screening
18. 10.1038/424870a10.1038/424870a ↗
19. 10.1038/nrm223610.1038/nrm2236 ↗
20. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.023110.1089/ten.tea.2007.0231 ↗
21. 10.3109/10408444.2012.68211510.3109/10408444.2012.682115 ↗
22. 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.045310.1089/ten.tec.2014.0453 ↗
23. 10.1263/jbb.99.31110.1263/jbb.99.311 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.07010.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.070 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01628.x10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01628.x ↗
26. 10.1097/00000658-190810000-0000510.1097/00000658-190810000-00005 ↗
27. 10.1002/hep.51030021510.1002/hep.510300215 ↗
28. Comparative study of various delivery methods for the supply of alpha‐ketoglutarate to the neural cells for tissue engineering10.1155/2013/294679 ↗
29. 10.1002/hep.2775310.1002/hep.27753 ↗
30. 10.1371/journal.pone.011360910.1371/journal.pone.0113609 ↗
31. 10.1016/0009-8981(80)90407-610.1016/0009-8981(80)90407-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0022-1759(97)00068-910.1016/S0022-1759(97)00068-9 ↗
33. 10.1038/nprot.2013.02710.1038/nprot.2013.027 ↗
34. Jain E · 2016 · 421
35. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00778.x10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00778.x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.10510.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.105 ↗
37. 10.1006/excr.2001.546710.1006/excr.2001.5467 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.036 ↗
39. 10.1002/hep.2476010.1002/hep.24760 ↗
40. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960705)51:1<100::AID-BIT12>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960705)51:1<100::AID-BIT12>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
41. Pittman RN. · 2011 · 1
42. 10.1002/bit.26043071510.1002/bit.260430715 ↗
43. 10.1002/bit.107110.1002/bit.1071 ↗
44. 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.025001001.x10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.025001001.x ↗
45. 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1998.06211.x10.1046/j.1525-1594.1998.06211.x ↗
46. 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06918.x10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06918.x ↗