journal article·2003-11-15

In vitro cytotoxicity testing of AB‐polymer networks based on oligo(ϵ‐caprolactone) segments after different sterilization techniques

Dorothee Rickert, A. Lendlein, A. M. Schmidt, S. Kelch, W. Roehlke, R. Fuhrmann, R. P. Franke

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Recently developed versatile biodegradable polymeric biomaterial offer new therapeutic options in numerous medical fields. Biocompatibility is a crucial requirement for the biomedical application of biomaterials, including the sterilization of these materials with the use of accepted protocols. Ethylene‐oxide (EO) and low‐temperature plasma (LTP) sterilization are frequently used low‐temperature sterilization technologies for heat‐sensitive materials. The agarose diffusion assay is a recommended cell‐screening test to assess the cytotoxicity of biomaterials in vitro. The sensitivity of the agarose assay can be increased by using a modified computer‐based image‐analysis system. The influence of EO and LTP sterilization on the cytotoxicity of a versatile polymer system of shape‐memory polymer networks based on oligo (ϵ‐caprolactone) dimethacrylate and n‐butyl acrylate was investigated. Statistically significant differences in the rate of cell lysis after EO and LTP sterilization of the polymer samples were detected by using this modified quantification system. The influence of the different sterilization techniques on the cytotoxicity of the polymeric material, as well as the clinical relevance of the described differences, are discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 67B: 722–731, 2003
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer composites and self-healing · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.106610210.1126/science.1066102 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0168-3659(98)00093-510.1016/S0168-3659(98)00093-5 ↗
3. ASTM · 1992 · 239
4. Wallhäuser KH · 1995
5. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.84210.1073/pnas.98.3.842 ↗
6. 10.1016/0032-3861(96)85373-010.1016/0032-3861(96)85373-0 ↗
7. 10.1021/j150553a03310.1021/j150553a033 ↗
8. 10.1002/pol.1976.18014080510.1002/pol.1976.180140805 ↗
9. 10.1002/jps.260054103610.1002/jps.2600541036 ↗
10. 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90038-810.1016/0109-5641(94)90038-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00053-810.1016/S0142-9612(99)00053-8 ↗
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980605)40:3<378::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980605)40:3<378::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
13. 10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<774::AID-JBM23>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/1097-4636(20001215)52:4<774::AID-JBM23>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
14. 10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00144-510.1016/S0142-9612(96)00144-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90476-610.1016/0002-9149(94)90476-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00785-610.1016/S0002-9149(97)00785-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00055-510.1016/0142-9612(96)00055-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-9612(96)80003-210.1016/S0142-9612(96)80003-2 ↗
19. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00365.x10.1046/j.1472-765X.1998.00365.x ↗
20. Compatibility of medical devices and materials with low‐temperature hydrogen peroxide gas plasma
21. TabrizianM LerougeS WertheimerMR MarchandR YakiaLH.Surface modification of polymer‐based devices by cold sterilization techniques. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Advanced Biomaterials Montreal Quebec Canada;1997.
22. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00401-X10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00401-X ↗
23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<371::AID-APP2>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990118)71:3<371::AID-APP2>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
24. Choosing a low‐temperature sterilization technology