journal article·2012-05

New measurements to compare soft tissue anchoring systems in pelvic floor surgery

Manfred Staat, Eva Trenz, Philipp Lohmann, Ralf Frotscher, Uwe Klinge, Ruth Tabaza, Ruth Kirschner‐Hermanns

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Suburethral slings as well as different meshes are widely used treating stress urinary incontinence and prolaps in women. With the development of MiniSlings and special meshes using less alloplastic material anchorage systems become more important to keep devices in place and to put some tension especially on the MiniSlings. To date, there are many different systems of MiniSlings of different companies on the market which differ in the structure of the used meshes and anchors. A new objective measurement method to compare different properties of MiniSling systems (mesh and anchor) is presented in this article. Ballistic gelatine acts as soft tissue surrogate. Significant differences in parameters like pull‐out strength of anchors or shrinkage of meshes under loading conditions have been determined. The form and size of the anchors as well as the structural stability of the meshes are decisive for a proper integration. The tested anchorings sytems showed markedly different mechanical function at their respective load bearing capacity. As the stable fixation of the device in tissue is a prerequisite for a permanet reinforcement, the proposed test system permits further optimisation of anchor and mesh devices to improve the success of the surgical treatment. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater , 2012.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pelvic floor disorders treatments · Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries · Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02546.x10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02546.x ↗
2. 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70346-910.1016/S0002-9378(94)70346-9 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.1990.tb08027.x10.1111/j.1600-0412.1990.tb08027.x ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-642-03787-010.1007/978-3-642-03787-0 ↗
5. Konsensus zur Anwendung der “Tension‐free Vaginal Tape (TVT)” Operation bei der weiblichen Belastungsinkontinenz
6. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01268.x10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01268.x ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09051.x10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09051.x ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.b.3085910.1002/jbm.b.30859 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00192-007-0446-110.1007/s00192-007-0446-1 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00947.x10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00947.x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.11.03610.1016/j.forsciint.2003.11.036 ↗
12. SamsamiS.Zur Verträglichkeit von Implantaten am Beckenboden. Dr. med. Dissertation Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich 2010.
13. Code_Aster 10.3 User's Manual. A product of Électricité de France R&D Clamart France 2010. Available at:http://www.code‐aster.org/V2/spip.php?rubrique2.
14. Structural and thermal properties of polypropylene mesh used in treatment of stress urinary incontinence