journal article·2025-03

Impact of Thermal Electrode Activation on Electrocatalyst Performance in KCrPDTA/K4Fe(CN)6 Flow Batteries

Talia Echeverria, Francesco Bernasconi, Paweł P. Ziemiański, David Reber

Batteries & Supercaps· Volume 8· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Improving electrode performance is crucial for increasing energy efficiency and power density in redox flow batteries. Here, we study the effects of thermal activation of carbon paper electrodes on the performance of bismuth as an electrocatalyst in high‐voltage KCrPDTA/K4Fe(CN)6 flow batteries. While thermal activation improves wettability and surface area, it also leads to the formation of large, agglomerated bismuth deposits that reduce Coulombic efficiency. Although bismuth lowers cell resistance and enhances voltage efficiency, it promotes parasitic hydrogen evolution depending on its morphology, underscoring the need for optimized catalyst deposition techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology 8600 Dübendorf Switzerland

University of Picardie Jules Vernes 80000 Amiens France

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1.
2. 10.1557/s43581-022-00027-x10.1557/s43581-022-00027-x ↗
3. 10.1016/j.coche.2022.10085510.1016/j.coche.2022.100855 ↗
4.
5. 10.1039/D3YA00208J10.1039/D3YA00208J ↗
6. Reber D. · Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. · 2023 · 4
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0104310.1021/acsenergylett.3c01043 ↗
8.
9. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.00510.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.005 ↗
10. 10.26599/NRE.2023.912004510.26599/NRE.2023.9120045 ↗
11.
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0076110.1021/acsenergylett.0c00761 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0069910.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00699 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.10151210.1016/j.apmt.2022.101512 ↗
15. Robb B. H. · Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. · 2022 · 3
16. 10.1038/s41560-024-01677-610.1038/s41560-024-01677-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.12910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.129 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23087710.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230877 ↗
19. 10.1002/advs.20230720910.1002/advs.202307209 ↗
20.
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.11810.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.118 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11848310.1016/j.carbon.2023.118483 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23301010.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233010 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.8b1579310.1021/acsami.8b15793 ↗
25.
26. 10.1002/asia.20220124210.1002/asia.202201242 ↗
27. 10.1002/cssc.20130104510.1002/cssc.201301045 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20191056410.1002/adfm.201910564 ↗
29.
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12785510.1016/j.cej.2020.127855 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.16110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.161 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.14810.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.148 ↗
33. Schweiss R. · White paper SGL Group · 2016 · 267
34. 10.1063/1.167410810.1063/1.1674108 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13514310.1016/j.electacta.2019.135143 ↗
37. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab7c6f10.1149/1945-7111/ab7c6f ↗
38.
39. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.01610.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.016 ↗
40. 10.14447/jnmes.v16i4.15510.14447/jnmes.v16i4.155 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.01.02810.1016/j.jechem.2018.01.028 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0194410.1021/acsaem.8b01944 ↗
43.
44. 10.1038/nature1906010.1038/nature19060 ↗
45. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0002310.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00023 ↗