journal article·2025-11Open access

Toward Carbon‐Free Cathodes for Fluoride Ion Batteries: Deconvoluting Effects of Active Material and Conductive Additive on Charging and Cyclic Stability

Tommi Hendrik Aalto, Roham Talei, Kathrin Küster, Guido Schmitz, Oliver Clemens

Batteries & Supercaps· Volume 8· Issue 11

Abstract

In this study, conductive, fluorine and antimony codoped tin oxide nanoparticles (FATO‐NPs) are highlighted as a possible alternative for conductive carbon additives in fluoride ion batteries, successfully circumventing oxidative side reactions. Since good cyclability with high and stable discharge capacities is achieved with both types of conductive additive at a high stack pressure of 180 MPa, it is concluded that conductive carbon is well‐suited for high‐voltage fluoride ion batteries, contrary to prior assumptions. However, FATO‐NP‐based cathodes outperform those based on conductive carbon at lower stack pressures of 50 MPa, emphasizing the importance of avoiding carbon fluorination at low stack pressures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Materials Synthesis Institute for Materials Science University of Stuttgart Heisenbergstraße 3 70569 Stuttgart Germany

Department of Materials Physics Institute for Materials Science, Synthesis University of Stuttgart Heisenbergstraße 3 70569 Stuttgart Germany

Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research Heisenbergstraße 1 70569 Stuttgart Germany

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2015.12.00210.1016/j.jfluchem.2015.12.002 ↗
2. 10.1039/D0TA11656D10.1039/D0TA11656D ↗
3. 10.1039/C7TA09427B10.1039/C7TA09427B ↗
4. 10.1038/s43246-020-0030-510.1038/s43246-020-0030-5 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0507510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05075 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0176210.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01762 ↗
7. 10.4236/jcpt.2018.8400610.4236/jcpt.2018.84006 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00736-910.1016/S1359-6462(01)00736-9 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10854-017-7433-110.1007/s10854-017-7433-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.00510.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.005 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.63210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.632 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10971-009-2094-z10.1007/s10971-009-2094-z ↗
13. 10.3390/ma504066110.3390/ma5040661 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.02.03110.1016/j.jcis.2010.02.031 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00473-010.1016/S0925-8388(03)00473-0 ↗
16. Nowroozi M. A. · 2020
17. 10.1039/C5RA19056H10.1039/C5RA19056H ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.06010.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.060 ↗
19. 10.1088/0022-3727/37/13/01910.1088/0022-3727/37/13/019 ↗
20. 10.1002/sstr.20230057010.1002/sstr.202300570 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0066110.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00661 ↗
22. Moulder J. F. · 1992
23. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.10011210.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100112 ↗
24. 10.1002/open.20180010610.1002/open.201800106 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0273610.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02736 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.3c1087110.1021/jacs.3c10871 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.00810.1016/j.joule.2022.02.008 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20230353910.1002/aenm.202303539 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.07.00210.1016/j.joule.2022.07.002 ↗