Augmentation of osteoporotic bone: Effect of pulsed jet‐lavage on injection forces, cement distribution, and push‐out strength of implants
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Demographic change in the population leads to higher incidence of fragility fractures. Fracture fixation with standard implants may lead to implant cut‐out due to reduced purchase. Augmentation of the bone stock with bone cements might overcome this problem. However, cancellous bone infiltration with the viscous cement dough reveals problems of fat embolism or high pressures during application of the cement. This study investigates the improved quality of bovine cancellous bone augmentation when pulsed jet‐lavage is used for fat and marrow removal. Parameters such as injection forces, cement dough distribution through cannulated implants and mechanical strength of the fixation were applied for quantification. Injection of 5 mL of acrylic bone cement required significantly lower forces in the lavaged as compared to the untreated bone (50 N vs. >300 N). Cement distribution was much more homogeneous and push‐out forces significantly higher in the pretreated bone group (8.33 ± 1.41 kN vs. 1.66 ± 0.63 kN). The application of pulsed jet‐lavage for fat removal prior to acrylic cement augmentation led to much more controlled outcomes of the augmentation. This seems to be a relevant step towards safe and efficient injection of bone cements into cancellous bone structures. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2006
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone fractures and treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Hip and Femur Fractures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0020-1383(00)00186-810.1016/S0020-1383(00)00186-8 ↗
2. Prevention of hip lag screw cut‐out in osteoporotic patients: Rationale and review of the literature
3. 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.2410.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.24 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.injury.2003.08.01910.1016/j.injury.2003.08.019 ↗
5. 10.1097/00005131-200401000-0000710.1097/00005131-200401000-00007 ↗
6. Injection biomechanics of bone cements used in vertebroplasty
7. 10.1002/jbm.b.2001010.1002/jbm.b.20010 ↗
8. 10.1097/00007632-200210010-0002110.1097/00007632-200210010-00021 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.01010.1016/j.forsciint.2004.06.010 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00113-004-0763-510.1007/s00113-004-0763-5 ↗
11. 10.1097/00007632-200307150-0000510.1097/00007632-200307150-00005 ↗
12. 10.1055/s-2001-1187110.1055/s-2001-11871 ↗
13. Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496223 ↗
14. Augmentation of implant purchase with bone cements: An in vitro study of injectability and dough distribution
15. A study of intrusion characteristics of low viscosity cement Simplex‐P and Palacos cements in a bovine cancellous bone model
16. 10.1080/0001647021632010.1080/00016470216320 ↗
17. 10.3109/1073119810911900110.3109/10731198109119001 ↗