journal article·2017-01Open access

Wear characteristics of an unconstrained lumbar total disc replacement under a range of in vitro test conditions

Philip J. Hyde, John Fisher, Richard M. Hall

Abstract

Abstract The effect of kinematics, loading and centre of rotation on the wear of an unconstrained total disc replacement have been investigated using the ISO 18192‐1 standard test as a baseline. Mean volumetric wear rate and surface morphological effects were reported. Changing the phasing of the flexions to create a low (but finite) amount of crossing path motion at the bearing surfaces resulted in a significant fall in wear volume. However, the rate of wear was still much larger than previously reported values under zero cross shear conditions. Reducing the load did not result in a significant change in wear rate. Moving the centre of rotation of the disc inferiorly did significantly increase wear rate. A phenomenon of debris re‐attachment on the UHMWPE surface was observed and hypothesised to be due to a relatively harsh tribological operating regime in which lubricant replenishment and particle migration out of the bearing contact zone were limited. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 46–52, 2017.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering University of Leeds Leeds UK

Funding

National Institutes of Health · Arthritis Research UK grant · EPSRC · NIHR LMBRU Leeds Biomedical Musculoskeletal Research Unit · Wellcome Trust and EPSRC

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0026804210.1007/BF00268042 ↗
2. 10.1016/0020-7403(81)90079-510.1016/0020-7403(81)90079-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)80050-X10.1016/S0021-9290(98)80050-X ↗
4. Wear‐simulation analysis of rotating‐platform mobile‐bearing knees
5. 10.1115/1.345165510.1115/1.3451655 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.82011020210.1002/jbm.820110202 ↗
7. Aseptic loosening in total hip implants: The role of polyethylene wear debris
8. 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.10510.1016/j.wear.2005.02.105 ↗
9. 10.1243/09544119JEIM40710.1243/09544119JEIM407 ↗
10. 10.1243/EMED_JOUR_1988_017_031_0210.1243/EMED_JOUR_1988_017_031_02 ↗
11. 10.1097/01.brs.0000228716.60863.ab10.1097/01.brs.0000228716.60863.ab ↗
12. 10.1007/s00586-008-0840-510.1007/s00586-008-0840-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.00310.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.003 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00586-010-1396-810.1007/s00586-010-1396-8 ↗
15. Wear simulation of total disc arthroplasties: Sensitivity to device design and test parameters
16. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823cbd6e10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823cbd6e ↗
17. 10.1243/13506501JET18710.1243/13506501JET187 ↗
18. 10.1302/0301-620X.93B7.2639210.1302/0301-620X.93B7.26392 ↗
19. 10.2106/JBJS.H.0162510.2106/JBJS.H.01625 ↗
20. 10.2106/JBJS.G.0171210.2106/JBJS.G.01712 ↗
21. 10.1097/00007632-200310151-0000610.1097/00007632-200310151-00006 ↗
22. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal‐on‐metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity?
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.01010.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.07110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.071 ↗
25. Polyethylene wear debris and long‐term clinical failure of the Charite disc prosthesis: A study of 4 patients.[erratum appears in Spine. 2007 Apr 20;32(9):1052]
26. 10.1016/j.esas.2009.11.00310.1016/j.esas.2009.11.003 ↗
27. TipperJ HyderP BrownT InghamE FisherJ HallR. Quantitative Comparison of UHMWPE Wear Particles Generated from ProDisc‐L Total Disc Replacements Tested Under Altered Simulation Inputs. In: Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting.2013: San Antonio Texas.
28. 10.1097/00007632-198809000-0001110.1097/00007632-198809000-00011 ↗
29. Bogduk N · 2005
30. 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.14510.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.145 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.00510.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.005 ↗
32. 10.1023/A:101851531863010.1023/A:1018515318630 ↗
33. 10.1016/0043-1648(94)07032-610.1016/0043-1648(94)07032-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.02710.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.027 ↗
35. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_341_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_341_02 ↗
36. 10.1039/c2fd00001f10.1039/c2fd00001f ↗
37. HydePJ. Bio‐tribology of Total Disc Replacements of the Lumbar Spine in Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering. 2012 University of Leeds: Leeds.
38. 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.01210.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.012 ↗
39. 10.1053/j.semss.2006.03.01210.1053/j.semss.2006.03.012 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.01110.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.011 ↗
41. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318165e3be10.1097/BRS.0b013e318165e3be ↗
42. 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816dd2b610.1097/BSD.0b013e31816dd2b6 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00183-210.1016/S0043-1648(03)00183-2 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.12.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.12.001 ↗