journal article·2010-05Open access

Influence of direct laser fabrication implant topography on type IV bone: A histomorphometric study in humans

Jamil Awad Shibli, Carlo Mangano, Susana D'avila, Adriano Piattelli, Gabriele E. Pecora, Francesco Mangano, Tatiana Onuma, Luciana A. Cardoso, Daniel Sanchez Ferrari, Kelly C. Aguiar, Giovanna Iezzi

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this histologic study was to evaluate the influence of the direct laser fabrication (DFL) surface topography on bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC%), on bone density in the threaded area (BA%) as well as bone density outside the threaded area (BD%) in type IV bone after 8 weeks of unloaded healing. Thirty patients (mean age 51.34 ± 3.06 years) received 1 micro‐implant (2.5‐mm diameter and 6‐mm length) each during conventional implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Thirty micro‐implants with three topographies were evaluated: 10 machined (cpTi); 10 sandblasted and acid etched surface (SAE) and 10 DFL micro‐implants. After 8 weeks, the micro‐implants and the surrounding tissue were removed and prepared for histomorphometric analysis. Four micro‐implants (2 cpTi, 1 SAE and 1DLF) showed no osseointegration after the healing period. Histometric evaluation indicated that the mean BIC% was higher for the DFL and SAE surfaces (p = 0.0002). The BA% was higher for the DFL surface, although there was no difference with the SAE surface. The BD% was similar for all topographies (p > 0.05). Data suggest that the DFL and SAE surfaces presented a higher bone‐to‐implant contact rate compared with cpTi surfaces under unloaded conditions, after a healing period of 8 weeks. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2010
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01367.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01367.x ↗
2. 10.1007/s10856-006-0064-310.1007/s10856-006-0064-3 ↗
3. 10.1902/jop.2006.05032510.1902/jop.2006.050325 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.b.3060810.1002/jbm.b.30608 ↗
5. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro‐implants in human jawbone
6. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002128.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002128.x ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.82029041110.1002/jbm.820290411 ↗
8. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics
9. Investigation of tissue/implant interactions during the first two hours of implantation
10. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140203.x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.049 ↗
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199711)37:2<267::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199711)37:2<267::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
13. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.02910.1016/j.dental.2008.03.029 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.3203310.1002/jbm.a.32033 ↗
15. Frost HM · 2006 · 27
16. 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.94510.1902/jop.2003.74.7.945 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00177-910.1016/S0142-9612(96)00177-9 ↗
18. Mechanisms of endosseous integration
19. 10.1002/jbm.b.3025110.1002/jbm.b.30251 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00009-610.1016/S0142-9612(01)00009-6 ↗
21. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004350.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004350.x ↗
22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
23. 10.1096/fasebj.4.13.221015710.1096/fasebj.4.13.2210157 ↗
24. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)80752-610.1016/0142-9612(96)80752-6 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00635.x10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00635.x ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00272.x10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00272.x ↗
27. FaghihiS BateniMR AzariF SzpunarJA ValiH TabrizianM.The role of crystallographic texture of Ti‐6Al‐4V alloy on cell attachment and proliferation. In: ICOTOM 14: Textures of Materials (Parts 1 and 2);2005. p705–710.10.4028/0-87849-975-x.705 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.020 ↗
29. 10.1002/jbm.82029031410.1002/jbm.820290314 ↗
30. 10.1177/0895937499013001130110.1177/08959374990130011301 ↗
31. D'Hoedt B · 1985 · 46
32. 10.1002/jbm.a.3001610.1002/jbm.a.30016 ↗
33. 10.1177/15440591030820050910.1177/154405910308200509 ↗
34. 10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.210.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2 ↗
35. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Bränemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses
36. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x ↗
37. A 5‐year prospective multicenter follow‐up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants
38. Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid‐etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla
39. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)80750-210.1016/0142-9612(96)80750-2 ↗