Quantification of structural compliance of aged human and porcine aortic root tissues
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The structural compliance of the aortic root has a significant implication for valve procedures such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation and valve‐sparing aortic root replacement. However, a detailed quantification of human aortic root structural compliance, particularly in different regions, has been incomplete. In this study, the structural properties of human aortic roots (81 ± 8.74 years, n = 10) were characterized and compared with those of porcine ones (6–9 months, n = 10) using a vessel pressure‐inflation test. The test involved tracking three‐dimensional deformation of the markers affixed on the different surface regions of the aortic roots, including the three sinuses: the noncoronary sinus (NCS), the left‐coronary sinus (LCS), and the right‐coronary sinus (RCS), and at three regions along the longitudinal direction of each sinus: the upper sinus (US), the middle sinus (MS), and the lower sinus (LS), and the ascending aorta (AA) region above the NCS. We found that tissue stiffness in physiological pressure range was similar among the three human sinuses. A variation in regional structural stiffness of human aorta was observed. In the circumferential direction, the LS regions were the stiffest in the LCS and RCS, whereas NCS had relatively uniform stiffness. In the longitudinal direction, the human AA regions were more compliant than all sinuses. There was a significant difference in tissue stiffness between human and porcine aortic tissues, suggesting that the mechanical properties of porcine tissues may not be analogous to aged human ones. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 2365–2374, 2014.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments · Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tissue Mechanics Laboratory Biomedical Engineering Program and Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1136/heart.83.4.37610.1136/heart.83.4.376 ↗
2. 10.1007/s13239-011-0052-810.1007/s13239-011-0052-8 ↗
3. Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: Modes and physiologic determinants10.1161/circ.100.suppl_2.Ii-54 ↗
4. 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00262-J10.1016/0003-4975(95)00262-J ↗
5. 10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00405-010.1016/S1010-7940(02)00405-0 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1991.tb00349.x10.1111/j.1540-8191.1991.tb00349.x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.00210.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.03510.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.035 ↗
9. Biaxial mechanical properties of porcine ascending aortic wall tissue
10. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.00210.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.05610.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.056 ↗
12. Significant material property differences between the porcine ascending aorta and aortic sinuses
13. 10.1007/BF0251328810.1007/BF02513288 ↗
14. Iliopoulos DC · 2011
15. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.06310.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.063 ↗
16. 10.1002/ccd.2209310.1002/ccd.22093 ↗
17. 10.1067/mtc.2002.12115710.1067/mtc.2002.121157 ↗
18. 10.1148/radiology.183.1.154966210.1148/radiology.183.1.1549662 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.06210.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.062 ↗
20. Trans‐catheter implantation of a baloon‐expandable prosthetic heart valves: Early results in an animal model
21. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.03510.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.035 ↗
22. The Cribier‐Edwards percutaneous heart valve in the pulmonic position: Initial animal experience
23. 10.1002/ccd.2102910.1002/ccd.21029 ↗
24. 10.1002/ccd.2155110.1002/ccd.21551 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.12.02510.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.12.025 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.04.06410.1016/j.ejcts.2009.04.064 ↗
27. 10.3109/14017431.2012.74367510.3109/14017431.2012.743675 ↗
28. MarzanGT KararaHM.A computer program for direct linear transformation solution of the collinearity condition and some applications of it. Proceedings of the Symposium on Close‐Range Photogrammetric Systems1975;420–476.
29. 10.1114/1.141552310.1114/1.1415523 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.204933710.1115/1.2049337 ↗
31. Bathe KJ
32. 10.1114/1.152919410.1114/1.1529194 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.02210.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.022 ↗
34. 10.1115/1.279594710.1115/1.2795947 ↗
35. Mechanics of large and small cerebral arteries in chronic hypertension
36. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.52809110.1161/STROKEAHA.108.528091 ↗
37. 10.1152/japplphysiol.90592.200810.1152/japplphysiol.90592.2008 ↗
38. 10.1088/0031-9155/40/10/00210.1088/0031-9155/40/10/002 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.001 ↗
40. 10.1162/10547460332295590510.1162/105474603322955905 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.12.00310.1016/j.medengphy.2009.12.003 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.07.00910.1016/j.medengphy.2008.07.009 ↗
43. A coupled fluid‐structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root
44. The aortic interleaflet triangles annuloplasty: a multidisciplinary appraisal
45. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.08010.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.080 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.00610.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.006 ↗
47. 10.1080/030919004200019384710.1080/0309190042000193847 ↗
48. 10.1080/10255842.2010.49986710.1080/10255842.2010.499867 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.05.00610.1016/j.medengphy.2011.05.006 ↗
50. 10.1080/1025584080260942010.1080/10255840802609420 ↗