Bupivacaine‐eluting soy protein structures for controlled release and localized pain relief: An in vitro and in vivo study
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Burn pain is known to be excruciating, and while burn care has greatly advanced, treatment for burn‐related pain is lacking. Current pain relief methods include systemic administration of analgesics, which does not provide high drug concentration at the wound site. In the present study, soy protein was used as the base material for bupivacaine‐loaded hybrid wound dressings. The effect of the formulation on the drug release profile was studied using high performance liquid chromatography, and the cytotoxicity was tested on human fibroblasts. A second‐degree burn model in rats was used to quantify the efficacy of the wound dressings in vivo, using the Rat Grimace Scale. All tested films exhibited high biocompatibility, and the drug release profiles showed rapid release during the initial 5 hr and a continuous slower release for another 24 hr. Significant pain relief was achieved in the animal trials, proving a decrease of 51–68% in pain levels during days 1–3 post‐burn. Hence, the results indicate a safe and controlled bupivacaine release for a period of more than 24 hr, effectively treating pain caused by second‐degree burns. The understanding of the formulation‐properties effects, together with our in vivo study, enables to advance this field toward tailorable systems with high therapeutic potential.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microencapsulation and Drying Processes · Wound Healing and Treatments · Bee Products Chemical Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Medical Corps Israel Defense Forces Tel Aviv Israel
Department of Military Medicine Hebrew University Hadassah School of Medicine Jerusalem Israel
Department of Biomedical Engineering Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/BCR.000000000000007310.1097/BCR.0000000000000073 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00029-610.1016/S0305-4179(97)00029-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cps.2017.02.02610.1016/j.cps.2017.02.026 ↗
4. 10.1001/archpsyc.56.5.45010.1001/archpsyc.56.5.450 ↗
5. 10.1002/jps.2461010.1002/jps.24610 ↗
6. 10.12968/jowc.1999.8.3.2584810.12968/jowc.1999.8.3.25848 ↗
7. J.Moffatt P.J.Franks H.Hollinworth Understanding wound pain and trauma: an international perspective in pain at wound dressing changes in: Eur. Wound Manag. Assoc. (EWMA) 2002: pp.2–7.
8. 10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.01810.1016/j.addr.2017.09.018 ↗
9. 10.1097/01.BCR.0000095506.38723.C210.1097/01.BCR.0000095506.38723.C2 ↗
10. 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.9.254210.1200/JCO.2001.19.9.2542 ↗
11. 10.1080/1061186X.2018.142485910.1080/1061186X.2018.1424859 ↗
12. 10.1039/C8LC00098K10.1039/C8LC00098K ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.01310.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.013 ↗
14. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1111060910.3390/pharmaceutics11110609 ↗
15. Improved analgesic and anti‐inflammatory effect of diclofenac sodium by topical nanoemulgel: formulation development—in vitro and in vivo studies10.1155/2020/4071818 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00116.x10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00116.x ↗
17. 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.7.31910.12968/jowc.2011.20.7.319 ↗
18. 10.1007/s40261-016-0394-y10.1007/s40261-016-0394-y ↗
19. 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00057-710.1016/S0376-8716(03)00057-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.01610.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.016 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.11.01410.1016/j.ejpb.2006.11.014 ↗
22. 10.3109/10837450.2011.62786710.3109/10837450.2011.627867 ↗
23. 10.22203/eCM.v005a0110.22203/eCM.v005a01 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10856-005-0534-z10.1007/s10856-005-0534-z ↗
25. 10.1586/17434440.5.3.34910.1586/17434440.5.3.349 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.01510.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.015 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-3-319-12478-0_210.1007/978-3-319-12478-0_2 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00007-910.1016/S0926-6690(02)00007-9 ↗
29. 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004002.11278.3010.1023/B:JMSM.0000004002.11278.30 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00262.x10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00262.x ↗
31. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.015710.1089/ten.tea.2008.0157 ↗
32. 10.1002/term.53610.1002/term.536 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.05.01710.1016/j.msec.2019.05.017 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.03810.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.038 ↗
35. Electrospinning of alginate/soy protein isolated nanofibers and their release characteristics for biomedical applications
36. 10.1208/s12249-017-0928-510.1208/s12249-017-0928-5 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.03.03910.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.03.039 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10856-009-3821-210.1007/s10856-009-3821-2 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00780.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00780.x ↗
40. Mechanical and microstructural properties of hybrid poly(ethylene glycol) soy protein hydrogels for wound dressing applications
41. 10.1021/bm034050i10.1021/bm034050i ↗
42. Wong SS · 1991
43. 10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00063-610.1016/S0141-3910(03)00063-6 ↗
44. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15074.x10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15074.x ↗
45. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.00310.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.003 ↗
46. 10.1177/088532822097517810.1177/0885328220975178 ↗
47. 10.1016/0305-4179(90)90199-710.1016/0305-4179(90)90199-7 ↗
48. 10.1186/1744-8069-7-5510.1186/1744-8069-7-55 ↗
49. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04252.x10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04252.x ↗
50. 10.1098/rsif.2006.017910.1098/rsif.2006.0179 ↗
51. 10.1002/jps.2121010.1002/jps.21210 ↗
52. Bruschi ML · 2015 · 63
53. Release kinetics – concepts and applications
54. 10.1002/jps.260052121010.1002/jps.2600521210 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.04110.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.041 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.12.01910.1016/j.ejpb.2013.12.019 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.01.00410.1016/j.ejps.2017.01.004 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.10905710.1016/j.biopha.2019.109057 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.10310.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.103 ↗