journal article·2021-12Open access

Estimation of Li‐Ion Degradation Test Sample Sizes Required to Understand Cell‐to‐Cell Variability**

Philipp Dechent, Samuel Greenbank, Felix Hildenbrand, Saad Jbabdi, Dirk Uwe Sauer, David A. Howey

Batteries & Supercaps· Volume 4· Issue 12

Abstract

Abstract Ageing of lithium‐ion batteries results in irreversible reduction in performance. Intrinsic variability between cells, caused by manufacturing differences, occurs throughout life and increases with age. Researchers need to know the minimum number of cells they should test to give an accurate representation of population variability, since testing many cells is expensive. In this paper, empirical capacity versus time ageing models were fitted to various degradation datasets for commercially available cells assuming the model parameters could be drawn from a larger population distribution. Using a hierarchical Bayesian approach, we estimated the number of cells required to be tested. Depending on the complexity, ageing models with 1, 2 or 3 parameters respectively required data from at least 9, 11 or 13 cells for a consistent fit. This implies researchers will need to test at least these numbers of cells at each test point in their experiment to capture manufacturing variability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · GABA and Rice Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage Systems Group Institute for Power Electronics and Electrical Drives (ISEA) RWTH Aachen University Germany

Jülich Aachen Research Alliance JARA-Energy Germany

Battery Intelligence Lab Department of Engineering University of Oxford UK

Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging FMRIB University of Oxford UK

Helmholtz Institute Münster (HI MS) IEK-12, Forschungszentrum Jülich Münster Germany

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Nobel Committee. Press release: The Nobelprize in chemistry 2019. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2019/press-release/ 2019.
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.083 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.10810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.108 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.etran.2020.10010210.1016/j.etran.2020.100102 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.est.2017.09.01010.1016/j.est.2017.09.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.10925410.1016/j.rser.2019.109254 ↗
7. 10.1155/2012/39583810.1155/2012/395838 ↗
8. M. Dahmardeh Z. Xi ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg2019 5 (020909).10.1115/1.4042847 ↗
9. S. Orcioni A. Ricci L. Buccolini C. Scavongelli M. Conti In2017 13th Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems (WISES) pages 15–21 June2017.10.1109/WISES.2017.7986926 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.10810.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.108 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.06810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.068 ↗
12. 10.1109/TCAD.2014.238450610.1109/TCAD.2014.2384506 ↗
13. Rothgang S. · 2014 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC) · 2014 · 1
14. 10.1016/j.est.2018.04.03110.1016/j.est.2018.04.031 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.065 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.est.2019.02.01610.1016/j.est.2019.02.016 ↗
17. Beck D. · Energies · 2021 · 14
18. 10.1149/2.1081802jes10.1149/2.1081802jes ↗
19. 10.1016/j.egyai.2021.10009010.1016/j.egyai.2021.100090 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.est.2020.10187310.1016/j.est.2020.101873 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10090010.1016/j.est.2019.100900 ↗
23. 10.3390/en1105103110.3390/en11051031 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.est.2020.10141010.1016/j.est.2020.101410 ↗
25. Severson K. A. · Nat. Energy · 2019
26. 10.1016/j.egyai.2020.10000610.1016/j.egyai.2020.100006 ↗
27. S. Lehner Reliability Assessment of Lithium-Ion Battery Systems with Special Emphasis on Cell Performance Distribution. Shaker PhD thesis RWTH Aachen University 1 edition March2017.
28. 10.1038/srep3505110.1038/srep35051 ↗
29. 10.3390/batteries304003210.3390/batteries3040032 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.007 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.01210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.012 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.0281914jes10.1149/2.0281914jes ↗
33. Hu X. · Joule · 2020
34. D. U. Sauer Time-series cyclic aging data on 48 commercial nmc/graphite Aanyo/Panasonic UR18650E cylindrical cells 2021 doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2021-04545.
35. P. Dechent L. Willenberg M. Eckert D. U. Sauer. Time series data on cycle tests on Samsung NR18650-35E 2021 doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2021-07965.
36. P. Dechent S. Lehner D. U.Sauer Time series data on cycle tests on Samsung NR18650-15L1 2021 doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2021-08740.
37. 10.1038/s41586-020-1994-510.1038/s41586-020-1994-5 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.02310.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023 ↗
39. K. P. Murphy Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. Adaptive computation and machine learning series. MIT Press Cambridge MA 2012.
40. S. Theodoridis Chapter 13 - Bayesian Learning: Approximate Inference and Nonparametric Models. In Sergios Theodoridis editor Machine Learning (Second Edition) pages 647–730. Academic Press January2020.10.1016/B978-0-12-818803-3.00025-8 ↗
41. 10.1149/1945-7111/aba96d10.1149/1945-7111/aba96d ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.177010.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1770 ↗