journal article·2020-08Open access

Accelerated Optimization Methods for Force‐Field Parametrization in Battery Electrode Manufacturing Modeling

Teo Lombardo, Jean‐Baptiste Hoock, Emiliano N. Primo, Alain C. Ngandjong, Marc Duquesnoy, Alejandro A. Franco

Batteries & Supercaps· Volume 3· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract The performance, durability and cost of modern Li‐ion batteries (LIBs) strongly depend on their manufacturing process. In this regard, computational methods that attempt to model LIBs manufacturing have the potential to help experimentalists to reduce costs and improve performances of LIBs. To do so, the electrode slurry phase, consisting of a suspension of active material, carbon additive and binder in a solvent must be modeled at first at the mesoscopic scale. However, efforts in that sense are rare in literature due to the inherent complexity of slurries and the difficulty of setting up appropriate metrics for the validation of the modeling results. For the first time, we propose an approach relying on experimental data that allows to validate the properties of simulated Nickel‐Manganese‐Cobalt‐based slurries with different compositions and solid contents through force fields (FFs) parametrization. The latter was attained by Coarse‐Grained Molecular Dynamics (CGMD), which enables to model the slurry phase at the mesoscopic scale and to consider explicitly the carbon binder domain. Moreover, we demonstrate that the CGMD FFs parameterization can be accelerated thanks to different types of Particle Swarm Optimization‐based algorithms, which would allow faster screening of different simulated slurries fabrication conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratoire de Réactivité et Chimie des Solides (LRCS) UMR CNRS 7314 Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Hub de l'Energie 15 rue Baudelocque 80039 Amiens Cedex 1 France

Réseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l'Energie (RS2E) FR CNRS 3459, Hub de l'Energie 15 rue Baudelocque 80039 Amiens Cedex 1 France

Université de Picardie Jules Verne Plateforme MatriCS, UFR des Sciences 33 rue Saint-Leu 80039 Amiens Cedex 1 France

ALISTORE-European Research Institute, FR CNRS 3104 Hub de l'Energie 15 rue Baudelocque 80039 Amiens Cedex 1 France

Institut Universitaire de France 103 Boulevard Saint Michel 75005 Paris France

Funding

European Research Council · Institut Universitaire de France

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.01910.1016/j.rser.2016.10.019 ↗
2. Part 1 · 685
3. 10.1002/smll.20180538910.1002/smll.201805389 ↗
4. 10.1038/nchem.208510.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0042210.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.04010.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
7. 10.1149/2.0251701jes10.1149/2.0251701jes ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0023910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00239 ↗
10. Chouchane M. · J. Power Sources · 2019
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22787110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227871 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.11010.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.110 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0264710.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02647 ↗
14. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab632b10.1149/1945-7111/ab632b ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20120093210.1002/aenm.201200932 ↗
16. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-12395710.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-123957 ↗
17. 10.1039/C7SE00498B10.1039/C7SE00498B ↗
18. 10.1149/2.291815jes10.1149/2.291815jes ↗
19. 10.1149/2.0601711jes10.1149/2.0601711jes ↗
20. https://www.u-picardie.fr/erc-artistic/.
21. 10.1039/C7TA07255D10.1039/C7TA07255D ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.13710.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.137 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.10110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.101 ↗
24. 10.1002/batt.20190013510.1002/batt.201900135 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.014 ↗
26. https://lammps.sandia.gov/.
27. Maginn E. J. · Living J. Comput. Mol. Sci. · 2018 · 1 · 6324
28. Liu T.-J. · Printed Batteries · 2018
29. Kennedy J. · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern. · 1997 · 5 · 4104
30. Eberhart R. C. · Proc. IEEE Conf. Evol. Comput. ICEC · 2001 · 1 · 81
31. 10.1007/s11669-007-9019-810.1007/s11669-007-9019-8 ↗
32. 10.1162/EVCO_r_0018010.1162/EVCO_r_00180 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.asoc.2007.05.00510.1016/j.asoc.2007.05.005 ↗
34. Wang Y. · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 1
35. 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.00810.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.008 ↗
36. Wang Y. · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2015 · 27
37. 10.1039/C8FD00055G10.1039/C8FD00055G ↗
38. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.03710.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.037 ↗
39. https://fr.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/57286-video-tutorial-of-particle-swarm-optimization-pso-in-matlab (accessed in december 2018).
40. 10.1149/2.026408jes10.1149/2.026408jes ↗
41. Sangrós Giménez C. · Energy Technol. · 2019
42. 10.1016/j.apt.2018.05.01410.1016/j.apt.2018.05.014 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.02010.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.020 ↗
44. https://www.u-picardie.fr/erc-artistic/computational-portal/.