journal article·2025-01-11Open access

Comparative Study on Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicle Batteries from a Regional and Energy Perspective

Ruiqi Feng, Wei Guo, Chenjie Zhang, Yuxuan Nie, Jiajing Li

Batteries· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the global goal of “carbon neutrality”, the advancement of electric vehicles (EVs) holds substantial importance for diminishing the reliance on fossil fuels, mitigating vehicular emissions, and fostering the transition of the automotive sector towards a sustainable, low-carbon paradigm. The wide application of electric vehicles not only reduces the dependence on non-renewable resources such as oil, but also concurrently effectuates a substantial reduction in carbon emissions within the transportation sector. In the realm of electric vehicles, ternary lithium batteries (NCM) and lithium iron phosphate batteries (LFP) are two widely used batteries. This study examines the resource utilization and environmental repercussions associated with the production of 1 kW ternary lithium batteries and lithium iron phosphate batteries, employing a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework. The importance of clean energy in reducing environmental pollution and global warming potential is revealed by introducing five different power generation types and the regional power generation structure in China into the power battery production process. The findings of the investigation indicate that lithium iron phosphate batteries exhibit pronounced superiority in terms of environmental sustainability, while ternary lithium batteries are more advantageous in terms of performance. The mitigation of environmental pollution associated with battery production can be significantly achieved by the holistic integration of clean energy sources and the systematic optimization of manufacturing processes. Specific interventions encompass enhancing the energy efficiency of the production process, incorporating renewable energy sources for power generation, and minimizing the utilization of hazardous materials. By implementing these strategies, the battery sector can advance towards a more environmentally benign and sustainable trajectory.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Extraction and Separation Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Hubei Research Center for New Energy & Intelligent Connected Vehicle, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Institute of Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technology, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Guangxi · Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province · Guangxi Major Science and Technology Project · 111 Project

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Thoughts on strategies and paths to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality in China10.1007/s11708-023-0883-7 ↗
2. Carbon Neutrality: A Review10.1115/1.4062545 ↗
3. Long-term energy-environment-economic programming under carbon neutrality target: A study on China’s regional energy transition pathways and CO2 mitigation strategies10.1080/15567249.2023.2229321 ↗
4. The impact of China’s high-quality development of energy on carbon neutrality10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.089 ↗
5. Pathways to achieve carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality by 2060: A case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China10.1016/j.rser.2023.113955 ↗
6. US-China coordination on carbon neutrality: An analytical framework10.1080/14693062.2023.2200379 ↗
7. Net Zero Emissions of Greenhouse Gases by 2050: Achievable and at What Cost?10.1142/S201000782340002X ↗
8. Green innovation and resource efficiency to meet net-zero emission10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104231 ↗
9. Net-zero approaches must consider Earth system impacts to achieve climate goals10.1038/s41558-023-01862-7 ↗
10. Terminology for future-oriented life cycle assessment: Review and recommendations10.1007/s11367-023-02265-8 ↗
11. Comparative life cycle assessment of sodium-ion and lithium iron phosphate batteries in the context of carbon neutrality
12. Best practices for life cycle assessment of batteries10.1038/s41893-023-01067-y ↗
13. How to build a state-of-the-art battery energy storage market? Challenges, opportunities, and future directions10.1016/j.est.2024.111174 ↗
14. The environmental impact of disposable versus re-chargeable batteries for consumer use10.1065/lca2006.08.270 ↗
15. Circularity and life cycle environmental impact assessment of batteries for electric vehicles: Industrial challenges, best practices and research guidelines10.1016/j.rser.2022.112941 ↗
16. Are future recycling benefits misleading? Prospective life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries10.1111/jiec.13413 ↗
17. Life cycle assessment of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide batteries and lithium iron phosphate batteries for electric vehicles in China10.1016/j.est.2022.104767 ↗
18. Meeting China’s electricity demand with renewable energy over Tibetan Plateau10.1016/j.scib.2022.12.012 ↗
19. Synergistic Paths of Reduced Pollution and Carbon Emissions Based on Different Power Demands in China
20. Selective Recovery of Lithium from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
21. A comprehensive review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries: Urgent status and technology advances10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130535 ↗
22. Ma, L.W., Xi, X.L., Zhang, Z.Z., and Lyu, Z. (2022). Separation and Comprehensive Recovery of Cobalt, Nickel, and Lithium from Spent Power Lithium-Ion Batteries. Minerals, 12.10.3390/min12040425 ↗
23. Chemical, Structural, and Electronic Aspects of Formation and Degradation Behaviour on Different Length Scales of Ni-Rich NCM and Li-Rich HE-NCM Cathode Materials in Li-Ion Batteries10.1002/adma.201900985 ↗
24. Positive Electrode Materials for Li-Ion and Li-Batteries10.1021/cm902696j ↗
25. Reply to Comment on “Positive Electrode Materials for Li-Ion and Li-Batteries”10.1021/cm301245q ↗
26. The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 1404410.1065/lca2006.02.002 ↗
27. The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 1404410.1007/s11367-012-0426-7 ↗
28. Fifteen years of ISO 14040: A review10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.038 ↗
29. ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y ↗
30. A taste of the new ReCiPe for life cycle assessment: Consequences of the updated impact assessment method on food product LCAs10.1007/s11367-019-01653-3 ↗