journal article·2026-04Open access

Effect of Nanotextured Stainless Steel Surface Features on Antibacterial Properties and Osteoblast Activity In Vitro

Anuja Tripathi, Julie A. Champion

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bacterial colonization and poor osteointegration are significant challenges for stainless steel implants. These issues often lead to implant‐associated infections, localized tissue damage, and implant failure, which can result in chronic inflammation, osteomyelitis, the need for revision surgery, and delayed recovery. While nanotextured surface features have shown antibacterial activity and osteoblast proliferation, the specific role of surface feature size is not yet fully understood. Herein, we utilized an electrochemical technique to fabricate nanoprotrusion‐like features on stainless steel surfaces, with distinct morphology and topography by varying the etching time at a fixed potential. The results show that etching time directly influences surface morphology, roughness, feature size, and depth profile. As etching time increases, nanoprotrusions initially become more pronounced, but extended duration leads to their reduction. These variations in feature size on nanotextured stainless steel surfaces reveal that larger nanoprotrusion sizes created from intermediate etching times exhibit greatest antibacterial activity, while also best promoting osteoblast proliferation, calcium deposition, and alkaline phosphatase activity in vitro. These distinct functions from the same nanotexture feature sizes provide key insights into designing next‐generation stainless steel implants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · Georgia Institute of Technology

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.02510.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 ↗
2. 10.2106/JBJS.L.0078910.2106/JBJS.L.00789 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.knee.2014.10.00510.1016/j.knee.2014.10.005 ↗
4. 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.0011210.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00112 ↗
5. The Long‐Term Results of a Two‐Stage Protocol for Revision of an Infected Total Knee Replacement
6. 10.1002/smll.20240435110.1002/smll.202404351 ↗
7. 10.1038/d41586‐022‐00228‐x10.1038/d41586‐022‐00228‐x ↗
8. 10.1038/nbt.391910.1038/nbt.3919 ↗
9. 10.3390/ijms1703033410.3390/ijms17030334 ↗
10. 10.1116/1.492215710.1116/1.4922157 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c0009110.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00091 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5RA05206H10.1039/C5RA05206H ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.04910.1016/j.msec.2018.08.049 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.019 ↗
15. 10.1002/smll.20231154610.1002/smll.202311546 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0054410.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00544 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsomega.4c0951110.1021/acsomega.4c09511 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029 ↗
19. 10.4317/medoral.1995310.4317/medoral.19953 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.21710.1016/j.dental.2016.08.217 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0107210.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01072 ↗
22. 10.33924/amt-2022-01-0710.33924/amt-2022-01-07 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.88236910.1063/1.882369 ↗
24. 10.1093/femsmc/xtad02210.1093/femsmc/xtad022 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms383810.1038/ncomms3838 ↗
26. 10.1186/s13018-025-05467-y10.1186/s13018-025-05467-y ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1313294410.3390/ma13132944 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0166510.1021/acsnano.8b01665 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.redox.2021.10188810.1016/j.redox.2021.101888 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0195310.1021/acsomega.7b01953 ↗
31. 10.1021/accountsmr.1c0022210.1021/accountsmr.1c00222 ↗
32. 10.1039/C9RA02082A10.1039/C9RA02082A ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.030 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.00410.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.004 ↗
35. 10.1002/btm2.1023910.1002/btm2.10239 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01367.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01367.x ↗
37. 10.1021/acsabm.2c0095210.1021/acsabm.2c00952 ↗
38. 10.1186/s12951-014-0054-410.1186/s12951-014-0054-4 ↗
39. 10.1002/jor.2010510.1002/jor.20105 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.gene.2020.14485510.1016/j.gene.2020.144855 ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.83.19.718210.1073/pnas.83.19.7182 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.015 ↗
43. Effect of Controlled Microtopography on Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
44. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.003 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-018-04022-010.1038/s41467-018-04022-0 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.4c1449210.1021/acsami.4c14492 ↗
47. Y. K.Erdoğan “The Use of Nanostructured 316L Stainless Steel for Orthopedic and Cardiovascular Applications: Fabrication Characterization and In Vitro Cellular Interactions (Order No. 31656135) ” Proquest Dissertations and Theses A&I; Proquest One Academic. (3122678853) 2024 https://www.proquest.com/dissertations‐theses/use‐nanostructured‐316l‐stainless‐steel/docview/3122678853/se‐2.