journal article·2009-08

Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium‐based implant surfaces

Vanessa C. Mendes, Rahim Moineddin, John E. Davies

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We sought to assess the ability of nanotopographically complex titanium surfaces to accelerate osteoconduction. For this, 130 miniature bone ingrowth chambers (called “T plants”), fabricated from either commercially pure titanium (cpTi) or titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V or Ti64), with microtopographically complex surfaces were used in the study, of which 50 were further modified by the discrete crystalline deposition (DCD) of calcium phosphate (CAP) nanoparticles that superimposed a nanotopographic complexity on each implant surface. Thus, four experimental groups were generated (cpTi, cpTi‐DCD, Ti64, and Ti64‐DCD), and the Tplants were implanted bilaterally in the femora of Wistar rats for 9 days. After harvesting, the femora were trimmed, and multiple‐mounted samples were embedded in PMMA. The blocks produced were ground and block faces observed by back‐scattering electron imaging (BSEI) at different planes through the chambers. Osteoconduction was assessed, as a function of bone‐implant contact, on a total of 1087 BSEI micrographs and submitted to rigorous statistical analyses. Our results showed both the important effects of anatomic location on bone ingrowth and the significant increase in osteoconduction (p < 0.001) as a function of the enhanced surface nanotopography obtained by the CAP nanocrystals. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Davies JE · 2000 · 1
2. 10.1002/jbm.82027051210.1002/jbm.820270512 ↗
3. Mechanisms of endosseous integration
4. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x ↗
5. 10.1177/0022034586065008050110.1177/00220345860650080501 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.82025070810.1002/jbm.820250708 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01309.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01309.x ↗
8. 10.1002/jor.110006040910.1002/jor.1100060409 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.82024090210.1002/jbm.820240902 ↗
10. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth10.1097/00003086-198006000-00040 ↗
11. 10.3109/1745367810899177510.3109/17453678108991775 ↗
12. 10.1016/0142-9612(86)90036-010.1016/0142-9612(86)90036-0 ↗
13. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants
14. A 1‐year follow‐up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone
15. DziedzicDM DaviesJE.Effects of implant surface topography on osteoconduction. In: The 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials Boston Massachusetts USA 1994.
16. DziedzicDM DaviesJE.Porous coated surfaces and osteoconduction. In: The 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials San Francisco California USA 1995.
17. Dziedzic DM · 1996 · 124
18. NiwaS.MRS Spring Meeting San Francisco March1993.
19. Dziedzic DSM · 1995 · 155
20. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid‐etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.020 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.049 ↗
23. Gubbi P · 2007 · 804
24. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00009-610.1016/S0142-9612(01)00009-6 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.009 ↗
26. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130513.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130513.x ↗
27. 10.1097/00001665-200305000-0000610.1097/00001665-200305000-00006 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01189.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01189.x ↗
29. Lazzara RJ · 2000 · 381
30. Dual‐etched implants loaded after 1‐ and 2‐month healing periods: A histologic comparison in baboons
31. 10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00955.x10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00955.x ↗
32. 10.1902/jop.2007.06029710.1902/jop.2007.060297 ↗
33. Influence of a nanometer‐scale surface enhancement on de novo bone formation on titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in human maxillae
34. 10.3109/1745367780900571610.3109/17453677809005716 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.005 ↗