Swift Prediction of Battery Performance: Applying Machine Learning Models on Microstructural Electrode Images for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the use of artificial neural networks as a potentially efficient method to determine the rate capability of electrodes for lithium-ion batteries with different porosities. The performance of a lithium-ion battery is, to a large extent, determined by the microstructure (i.e., layer thickness and porosity) of its electrodes. Tailoring the microstructure to a specific application is a crucial process in battery development. However, unravelling the complex correlations between microstructure and rate performance using either experiments or simulations is time-consuming and costly. Our approach provides a swift method for predicting the rate capability of battery electrodes by using machine learning on microstructural images of electrode cross-sections. We train multiple models in order to predict the specific capacity based on the batteries’ microstructure and investigate the decisive parts of the microstructure through the use of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods. Our study shows that even comparably small neural network architectures are capable of providing state-of-the-art prediction results. In addition to this, our XAI studies demonstrate that the models are using understandable human features while ignoring present artefacts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Research Institute Aalen (IMFAA), Aalen University, Beethovenstr. 1, 73430 Aalen, Germany
Funding
Carl Zeiss Foundation · Aalen University of Applied Sciences and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. How We Made the Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery10.1038/s41928-018-0048-6 ↗
2. Opportunities and Challenges of Lithium Ion Batteries in Automotive Applications10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02584 ↗
3. Applications of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Grid-Scale Energy Storage Systems10.1007/s12209-020-00236-w ↗
4. Heimes, H.H., Kampker, A., Lienemann, C., Locke, M., Offermanns, C., Michaelis, S., and Rahimzei, E. (2018). Lithium-Ion Battery Cell Production Process, VDMA.
5. Review—A Review on the Anode and Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Improved Subzero Temperature Performance10.1149/1945-7111/ac49cc ↗
6. Impact of Particle Size Distribution on Performance of Lithium-Ion Batteries10.1002/celc.202001249 ↗
7. Calendering Effects on the Physical and Electrochemical Properties of Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2 Cathode10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.001 ↗
8. Highly Densified NCM-Cathodes for High Energy Li-Ion Batteries: Microstructural Evolution during Densification and Its Influence on the Performance of the Electrodes10.1016/j.est.2018.03.002 ↗
9. Ultrahigh-Capacity and Scalable Architected Battery Electrodes via Tortuosity Modulation10.1021/acsnano.1c06491 ↗
10. Design of Battery Electrodes with Dual-Scale Porosity to Minimize Tortuosity and Maximize Performance10.1002/adma.201204055 ↗
11. Strategies for Formulation Optimization of Composite Positive Electrodes for Lithium Ion Batteries Based on Layered Oxide, Spinel, and Olivine-Type Active Materials10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232179 ↗
12. A Comprehensive Understanding of Electrode Thickness Effects on the Electrochemical Performances of Li-Ion Battery Cathodes10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.161 ↗
13. Porous Cathode Optimization for Lithium Cells: Ionic and Electronic Conductivity, Capacity, and Selection of Materials10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.044 ↗
14. Understanding Thickness and Porosity Effects on the Electrochemical Performance of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2-Based Cathodes for High Energy Li-Ion Batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.060 ↗
15. Influence of Conductive Additives and Binder on the Impedance of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes: Effect of Morphology10.1149/1945-7111/ab6b1d ↗
16. Impact of Carbon Binder Domain on the Performance of Lithium-Metal Batteries10.1149/1945-7111/ac9a82 ↗
17. Effect of Carbon Blacks on Electrical Conduction and Conductive Binder Domain of Next-Generation Lithium-Ion Batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233916 ↗
18. Exploiting Materials to Their Full Potential, a Li-Ion Battery Electrode Formulation Optimization Study10.1021/acsaem.0c00015 ↗
19. Geometric and Electrochemical Characteristics of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 Electrode with Different Calendering Conditions10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.151 ↗
20. Nikpour, M., Liu, B., Minson, P., Hillman, Z., Mazzeo, B., and Wheeler, D. (2022). Li-Ion Electrode Microstructure Evolution during Drying and Calendering. Batteries, 8.10.3390/batteries8090107 ↗
21. Investigations on the Microstructure-Property Relationship of NCM-Based Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries10.3139/147.110528 ↗
22. Microstructure Effects in Plasticized Electrodes Based on PVDF–HFP for Plastic Li-Ion Batteries
23. Effect of LiCoO2 Cathode Density and Thickness on Electrochemical Performance of Lithium-Ion Batteries10.33961/JECST.2013.4.1.27 ↗
24. Electrode Mesoscale as a Collection of Particles: Coupled Electrochemical and Mechanical Analysis of NMC Cathodes10.1149/1945-7111/ab632b ↗
25. Lithium Ion Battery Electrodes Predicted from Manufacturing Simulations: Assessing the Impact of the Carbon-Binder Spatial Location on the Electrochemical Performance10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227285 ↗
26. Microstructural Evolution of Battery Electrodes during Calendering10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.010 ↗
27. Tortuosity Anisotropy in Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes10.1002/aenm.201301278 ↗
28. Mechanical, Electrical, and Ionic Behavior of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes via Discrete Element Method Simulations10.1002/ente.201900180 ↗
29. Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell10.1149/1.2221597 ↗
30. Lithium-Ion Battery Thermal-Electrochemical Model-Based State Estimation Using Orthogonal Collocation and a Modified Extended Kalman Filter10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.019 ↗
31. Review of Simplified Pseudo-Two-Dimensional Models of Lithium-Ion Batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.036 ↗
32. Thick Electrodes for Li-Ion Batteries: A Model Based Analysis10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.143 ↗
33. Simulation and Optimization of the Dual Lithium Ion Insertion Cell10.1149/1.2054684 ↗
34. Thermodynamic Consistent Transport Theory of Li-Ion Batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.088 ↗
35. Micro-Scale Modeling of Li-Ion Batteries: Parameterization and Validation10.1149/2.096205jes ↗
36. Multiscale Modeling of Lithium Ion Batteries: Thermal Aspects10.3762/bjnano.6.102 ↗
37. X-ray Tomography of Porous, Transition Metal Oxide Based Lithium Ion Battery Electrodes10.1002/aenm.201200932 ↗
38. Review of Models for Predicting the Cycling Performance of Lithium Ion Batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.070 ↗
39. Determination of the Lithium Ion Diffusion Coefficient in Graphite10.1149/1.1391556 ↗
40. Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning in Materials Science10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010015 ↗
41. Grain Size Analysis in Permanent Magnets from Kerr Microscopy Images Using Machine Learning Techniques10.1016/j.matchar.2022.111790 ↗
42. Image-Based Defect Detection in Lithium-Ion Battery Electrode Using Convolutional Neural Networks10.1007/s10845-019-01484-x ↗
43. Machine Learning in Materials Science10.1002/inf2.12028 ↗
44. Krawczyk, P., Baumgartl, H., Jansche, A., Bernthaler, T., Buettner, R., and Schneider, G. (2021, January 23–27). Comparison of Deep Learning Methods for Image Deblurring on Light Optical Materials Microscopy Data. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Lyon, France.10.1109/CASE49439.2021.9551404 ↗
45. Machine Learning for Advanced Energy Materials10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100049 ↗
46. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Battery Research: Hype or Reality?10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108 ↗
47. Faraji Niri, M., Aslansefat, K., Haghi, S., Hashemian, M., Daub, R., and Marco, J. (2023). A Review of the Applications of Explainable Machine Learning for Lithium–Ion Batteries: From Production to State and Performance Estimation. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16176360 ↗
48. Using Neurocomputing Techniques to Determine Microstructural Properties in a Li-Ion Battery10.1007/s00521-022-06985-0 ↗
49. Machine Learning Assisted Optimization of Electrochemical Properties for Ni-Rich Cathode Materials10.1038/s41598-018-34201-4 ↗
50. Artificial Intelligence Investigation of NMC Cathode Manufacturing Parameters Interdependencies10.1002/batt.201900135 ↗
51. Machine Learning-Based Assessment of the Impact of the Manufacturing Process on Battery Electrode Heterogeneity10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100090 ↗
52. Quantifying Key Factors for Optimised Manufacturing of Li-Ion Battery Anode and Cathode via Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100129 ↗
53. Data Mining in Battery Production Chains towards Multi-Criterial Quality Prediction10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.066 ↗
54. Faraji Niri, M., Mafeni Mase, J., and Marco, J. (2022). Performance Evaluation of Convolutional Auto Encoders for the Reconstruction of Li-Ion Battery Electrode Microstructure. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15124489 ↗
55. A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3084827 ↗
56. Lecun, Y., and Bengio, Y. (1995). The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, The MIT Press.
57. The Materialographic Preparation and Microstructure Characterization of Lithium Ion Accumulators10.3139/147.110150 ↗
58. Yang, K., Xie, X., Du, X., Zuo, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2023). Research on Micromechanical Behavior of Current Collector of Lithium-Ion Batteries Battery Cathode during the Calendering Process. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11061800 ↗
59. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., and Darrell, T. (2015, January 7–12). Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965 ↗
60. A Survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 ↗
61. A Comprehensive Analysis of Deep Regression10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2910523 ↗
62. Deep Learning for Computer Vision: A Brief Review10.1155/2018/7068349 ↗
63. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv.
64. Agarap, A.F. (2018). Deep Learning Using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU). arXiv.
65. Cortes, C., Mohri, M., and Rostamizadeh, A. (2012). L2 Regularization for Learning Kernels. arXiv.
66. Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift. arXiv.
67. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2015). Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV.2015.123 ↗
68. Maas, A.L., Hannun, A.Y., and Ng, A.Y. (2013, January 17–19). Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning—JMLR: W&CP, Atlanta, GA, USA.
69. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 ↗
70. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting
71. Zhang, M.R., Lucas, J., Hinton, G., and Ba, J. (2019). Lookahead Optimizer: K Steps Forward, 1 Step Back. arXiv.
72. Liu, L., Jiang, H., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., and Han, J. (2021). On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyond. arXiv.
73. Mean Absolute Percentage Error for Regression Models10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114 ↗
74. Reduced-Order Electrochemical Models with Shape Functions for Fast, Accurate Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries under High C-Rates10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121954 ↗
75. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
76. Drug Discovery with Explainable Artificial Intelligence10.1038/s42256-020-00236-4 ↗
77. Machine Learning in Materials Science: From Explainable Predictions to Autonomous Design10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110360 ↗
78. On Scientific Understanding with Artificial Intelligence10.1038/s42254-022-00518-3 ↗
79. Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence
80. Selvaraju, R.R., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Cogswell, M., Parikh, D., and Batra, D. (2016). Grad-CAM: Why Did You Say That?. arXiv.
81. Kohavi, R. (1995, January 20–25). A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montreal, QC, Canada.
82. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., and Szegedy, C. (2014). Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples. arXiv.
83. Dong, Y., Su, H., Zhu, J., and Bao, F. (2017). Towards Interpretable Deep Neural Networks by Leveraging Adversarial Examples. arXiv.
84. Ng, A.Y. (2004, January 4–8). Feature Selection, L1 vs. L2 Regularization, and Rotational Invariance. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, AB, Canada.