journal article·2014-08Open access

Synthesis and characterization of biomimetic citrate‐based biodegradable composites

Richard T. Tran, Liang Wang, Chang Zhang, Minjun Huang, Wanjin Tang, Chi Zhang, Zhongmin Zhang, Dadi Jin, Brittany Banik, Justin L. Brown, Zhiwei Xie, Xiaochun Bai, Jian Yang

Abstract

Abstract Natural bone apatite crystals, which mediate the development and regulate the load‐bearing function of bone, have recently been associated with strongly bound citrate molecules. However, such understanding has not been translated into bone biomaterial design and osteoblast cell culture. In this work, we have developed a new class of biodegradable, mechanically strong, and biocompatible citrate‐based polymer blends (CBPBs), which offer enhanced hydroxyapatite binding to produce more biomimetic composites (CBPBHAs) for orthopedic applications. CBPBHAs consist of the newly developed osteoconductive citrate‐presenting biodegradable polymers, crosslinked urethane‐doped polyester and poly (octanediol citrate), which can be composited with up to 65 wt % hydroxyapatite. CBPBHA networks produced materials with a compressive strength of 116.23 ± 5.37 MPa comparable to human cortical bone (100–230 MPa), and increased C2C12 osterix gene and alkaline phosphatase gene expression in vitro. The promising results above prompted an investigation on the role of citrate supplementation in culture medium for osteoblast culture, which showed that exogenous citrate supplemented into media accelerated the in vitro phenotype progression of MG‐63 osteoblasts. After 6 weeks of implantation in a rabbit lateral femoral condyle defect model, CBPBHA composites elicited minimal fibrous tissue encapsulation and were well integrated with the surrounding bone tissues. The development of citrate‐presenting CBPBHA biomaterials and preliminary studies revealing the effects of free exogenous citrate on osteoblast culture shows the potential of citrate biomaterials to bridge the gap in orthopedic biomaterial design and osteoblast cell culture in that the role of citrate molecules has previously been overlooked. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 2521–2532, 2014.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Bioengineering Materials Research Institute The Huck Institutes of The Life Sciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania 16802

Academy of Orthopedics Guangdong Province Department of Orthopedics The Third Affiliated Hospital Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510665 China

Department of Cell Biology School of Basic Medical Science Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510515 China

Department of Bioengineering The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington Texas 76010

Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas 75219

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.116486510.1126/science.1164865 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat244110.1038/nmat2441 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.090544510710.1073/pnas.0905445107 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.110709410810.1073/pnas.1107094108 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.090543910610.1073/pnas.0905439106 ↗
6. Mechanical properties of dispersed ceramic nanoparticles in polymer composites for orthopedic applications
7. 10.1002/1097-4636(20010615)55:4<475::AID-JBM1039>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/1097-4636(20010615)55:4<475::AID-JBM1039>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
8. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90266-610.1016/0142-9612(94)90266-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.01210.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.012 ↗
10. 10.1038/8671510.1038/86715 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat250510.1038/nmat2505 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.05810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.058 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.a.3090210.1002/jbm.a.30902 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.3187810.1002/jbm.a.31878 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.01.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.01.004 ↗
16. 10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/03412210.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034122 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.10510.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.105 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.02710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.027 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
20. 10.1016/B978-1-4832-3117-4.50014-010.1016/B978-1-4832-3117-4.50014-0 ↗
21. 10.1042/bj035101110.1042/bj0351011 ↗
22. 10.1042/bj057045310.1042/bj0570453 ↗
23. 10.1042/bj052026010.1042/bj0520260 ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.100921910710.1073/pnas.1009219107 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00118-010.1016/S0142-9612(99)00118-0 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.042 ↗
27. 10.1023/A:100899200982610.1023/A:1008992009826 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00221-610.1016/S0142-9612(01)00221-6 ↗
29. 10.1039/C1SM05786C10.1039/C1SM05786C ↗
30. Orthopaedic applications of bone graft & graft substitutes: A review
31. 10.1002/term.2410.1002/term.24 ↗
32. 10.1080/10910344.2011.58069910.1080/10910344.2011.580699 ↗
33. 10.1002/jbm.a.3157610.1002/jbm.a.31576 ↗
34. 10.1517/14712598.4.6.80110.1517/14712598.4.6.801 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.020 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.10610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.106 ↗
37. 10.1002/jbm.a.1048210.1002/jbm.a.10482 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.01110.1016/j.gene.2005.10.011 ↗
39. 10.1074/jbc.M111.24423610.1074/jbc.M111.244236 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.00110.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.001 ↗
41. 10.1002/mame.20110007410.1002/mame.201100074 ↗
42. 10.1021/la051677910.1021/la0516779 ↗
43. 10.1002/rcm.497410.1002/rcm.4974 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.00210.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.002 ↗
45. 10.1097/00003086-200202000-0000910.1097/00003086-200202000-00009 ↗
46. 10.1007/s00223-005-0170-010.1007/s00223-005-0170-0 ↗
47. 10.1186/1749-799X-5-3710.1186/1749-799X-5-37 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-510.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-5 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.091285510710.1073/pnas.0912855107 ↗
50. 10.1359/jbmr.08124810.1359/jbmr.081248 ↗