A Comparison of Lithium-Ion Cell Performance across Three Different Cell Formats
Source abstract
Abstract
To investigate the influence of cell formats during a cell development programme, lithium-ion cells have been prepared in three different formats. Coin cells, single layer pouch cells, and stacked pouch cells gave a range of scales of almost three orders of magnitude. The cells used the same electrode coatings, electrolyte and separator. The performance of the different formats was compared in long term cycling tests and in measurements of resistance and discharge capacities at different rates. Some test results were common to all three formats. However, the stacked pouch cells had higher discharge capacities at higher rates. During cycling tests, there were indications of differences in the predominant degradation mechanism between the stacked cells and the other two cell formats. The stacked cells showed faster resistance increases, whereas the coin cells showed faster capacity loss. The difference in degradation mechanism can be linked to the different thermal and mechanical environments in the three cell formats. The correlation in the electrochemical performance between coin cells, single layer pouch cells, and stacked pouch cells shows that developments within a single cell format are likely to lead to improvements across all cell formats.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Funding
Advanced Propulsion Centre
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Current status and challenges for automotive battery production technologies10.1038/s41560-018-0130-3 ↗
2. Lain, M.J., Brandon, J., and Kendrick, E. (2019). Design strategies for high power vs. high energy lithium ion cells. Batteries, 5.10.3390/batteries5040064 ↗
3. Evaluation of silicon based cells and the importance of scale up10.1149/07208.0197ecst ↗
4. Scale up of lithium ion batteries: From a coin cells to a 12 A h battery
5. Development of long life lithium ion battery for power storage10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00554-7 ↗
6. Influence of laser pulse duration on the electrochemical performance of laser structured LFP composite electrodes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.086 ↗
7. From coin cells to 400 mA h pouch cells: Enhancing performance of high capacity lithium ion cells via modifications in electrode construction and fabrication10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.077 ↗
8. Critical parameters for evaluating coin cells and pouch cells of rechargeable lithium metal batteries
9. The gap between long lifespan Li-S coin and pouch cells: The importance of lithium metal anode protection10.1016/j.ensm.2016.09.003 ↗
10. Influence of dry mixing and distribution of conductive additives in cathodes for lithium ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.081 ↗
11. INL/EXT-14-32849 (2010). USABC Battery Test Manual for PHEV, Idaho National Laboratory.
12. Correlation of electrolyte volume and electrochemical performance in lithium ion pouch cells with graphite anodes and NMC532 cathodes10.1149/2.1131706jes ↗
13. Yourey, W. (2020). Theoretical impact of manufacturing tolerances on lithium ion electrode and cell physical properties. Batteries, 6.10.3390/batteries6020023 ↗
14. Effect of mechanical compression on the ageing and expansion behaviour of Si/C composite / NMC811 in different lithium ion cell battery cell formats10.1149/2.1121915jes ↗
15. Performance degradation of high power lithium ion cells—Electrochemistry of harvested electrodes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.071 ↗
16. Calendar life study of lithium ion pouch cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.044 ↗
17. Capacity fade of NCA cathode for lithium ion batteries during accelerated calendar and cycle life tests. I. Comparison analysis between NCA and LCO cathodes in cylindrical lithium ion cells during long term storage test10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.079 ↗
18. Reproducibility of lithium ion cell reassembling processes and their influence on coin cell ageing10.1016/j.est.2019.04.006 ↗
19. Influence of cell design on impedance characteristics of cylindrical lithium ion cells: A model based assessment from electrode to cell level10.1016/j.est.2017.05.002 ↗
20. Development of experimental techniques for parameterisation of multi scale lithium ion battery models10.1149/1945-7111/ab9050 ↗
21. Energy density of cylindrical lithium in cells: A comparison of commercial 18650 to 21700 cells10.1149/2.0281814jes ↗
22. 18650 vs. 21700 lithium ion cells—A direct comparison of electrochemical, thermal and geometric properties10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228614 ↗
23. A numerical study of the effects of cell formats on the cycle life of lithium ion batteries10.1149/2.0261910jes ↗
24. Impact of cell size and format on external short circuit behaviour of lithium ion cells at varying cooling conditions: Modelling and simulation10.1149/2.0112001JES ↗
25. A guide to full coin cell making for academic researchers10.1149/2.1171902jes ↗
26. Enabling high energy, high voltage lithium ion cells: Standardisation of coin cell assembly, electrochemical testing and evaluation of full cells10.1149/2.0691614jes ↗
27. In Situ x-ray spatial profiling reveals uneven compression of electrode assemblies and steep lateral gradients in lithium ion coin cells10.1039/D0CP04436A ↗
28. Enhanced processing and testing concepts for new active materials for lithium ion batteries10.1002/ente.201900133 ↗
29. High energy electrode investigation for PHEV10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.117 ↗
30. Electrochemical methods for determining kinetic properties of solids10.1146/annurev.ms.08.080178.001413 ↗
31. Thermodynamic and mass transport properties of LiAl10.1149/1.2128939 ↗
32. Comparison between potentiostatic and galvanostatic intermittent titration techniques for determination of chemical diffusion coefficients in ion insertion electrodes10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.03.030 ↗
33. Use of asymmetric average charge and average discharge voltages as an indicator of the onset of unwanted lithium deposition in lithium ion cells10.1149/2.0011816jes ↗
34. Running out of lithium? A route to differentiate between capacity losses and active lithium losses in lithium ion batteries10.1039/C7CP05405J ↗
35. Nelson, P.A., Gallagher, K.G., Bloom, I., and Dees, D.W. (2012). Modelling the Performance and Cost of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric-Drive Vehicles, Argonne National Lab.10.2172/1209682 ↗
36. Simplified calculation of the area specific impedance for battery design10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.020 ↗
37. Ragone, D. (1968). Review of battery systems for electrically powered vehicles. SAE Tech. Paper, 680453.10.4271/680453 ↗
38. A review of lithium ion battery ageing mechanisms and estimations for automotive applications10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 ↗
39. Degradation diagnostics for lithium ion cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.011 ↗
40. An apparatus for the study of in situ gas evolution in lithium ion pouch cells10.1149/2.0151410jes ↗
41. Understanding the limitations of lithium ion batteries at high rates10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229690 ↗
42. Asymmetric diffusion in heterogeneous media10.1016/j.physa.2013.10.027 ↗
43. Local heat generation in a single stack lithium ion battery cell10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.182 ↗
44. Production of larger area lithium ion cells—Pre-conditioning, cell stacking and quality assurance10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.101 ↗