journal article·2006-06

Bioactive glass/polymer composite materials with mechanical properties matching those of cortical bone

Veronika A. Koleganova, Suzanne M. Bernier, S. Jeffrey Dixon, Amin S. Rizkalla

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Stress shielding resulting from mismatch in dynamic mechanical properties contributes to the reduced stability of osseous implants. Our objective was to develop biocompatible composites having mechanical properties similar to those of cortical bone. Polymers of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) and 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA, 0–20%) and composites containing bioactive glass particles (70% SiO2, 25% CaO, and 5% P2O5), with or without silane treatment were prepared. Young's moduli of composites containing silane‐treated glass (16 GPa) were significantly greater than those of composites containing untreated glass (12–13 GPa) or of unfilled polymers (5–6 GPa). Bioactive glass reduced water sorption by the composites and incorporation of silane‐treated glass prevented HEMA‐induced increases in water sorption. Osteoblast‐like cells attached equally well to UDMA polymer and composite containing silane‐treated bioactive glass. Thus, silane treatment improved the mechanical properties of bioactive glass composites without compromising biocompatibility. This material has a Young's modulus comparable to that of cortical bone. Therefore, silane‐treated bioactive glass composites, when used as implant or cement materials, would reduce stress shielding and improve implant stability. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00707-X10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00707-X ↗
2. An Y · 2000 · 23
3. 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90010-Z10.1016/0021-9290(90)90010-Z ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.01110.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.011 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0041-624X(96)00078-910.1016/S0041-624X(96)00078-9 ↗
6. 10.1067/mse.2003.2210.1067/mse.2003.22 ↗
7. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100601.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100601.x ↗
8. 10.1177/15440591030820080310.1177/154405910308200803 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.82013051010.1002/jbm.820130510 ↗
10. 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90123-X10.1016/0278-2391(95)90123-X ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-010.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-0 ↗
12. 10.1007/3-540-48838-3_110.1007/3-540-48838-3_1 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.1009810.1002/jbm.10098 ↗
14. 10.1002/1097-4636(20010605)55:3<277::AID-JBM1015>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1097-4636(20010605)55:3<277::AID-JBM1015>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
15. 10.1243/095441198153390810.1243/0954411981533908 ↗
16. 10.1002/jab.77002040310.1002/jab.770020403 ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.a.1050310.1002/jbm.a.10503 ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199622)33:2<89::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199622)33:2<89::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
19. Tailoring surfaces with silanes
20. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00529-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00529-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00092-710.1016/S0109-5641(03)00092-7 ↗
22. Morphological and biochemical characterization of four clonal osteogenic sarcoma cell lines of rat origin
23. 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000036909.41843.1810.1023/B:PHAM.0000036909.41843.18 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.08410.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.084 ↗
25. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<231::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<231::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
26. 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00103-210.1016/S0109-5641(00)00103-2 ↗