Modeling of Material Characteristics of Conventional Synthetic Fabrics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This article presents a method for modeling the material characteristics of synthetic fabrics based on static tensile test results with consideration of material orthotropy. Material characteristics were determined for fabrics under load at three different angles in relation to their orthotropy. The fabrics examined were the following: polyester fabrics Bratex and Ortalion, cotton fabric with nylon and elastin fabric (poplin), and Gore-Tex membrane fabric. Considering the material mechanical characteristics, the differences were in grammage, maximum strain, and tensile strength. The study allowed us to determine the nonlinear elastic dependency between strain and stress. Test results were implemented within the Abaqus/Explicit framework for the purpose of performance of verification simulations. The correlation between simulated and experimental results was established. A high degree of similarity allows us to classify the obtained material model as usable in simulation work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Poznan University of Technology , Institute of Machine Design , Piotrowo 3 , Poznań , Poland
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Freitas A., Zhang G., Mathews R. (2017). Water footprint assessment of polyester and viscose and comprasion to cotton, Water footprint network
2. Oerlikon presentation based on The Fiber Year (2019)., published at ITMA 2019
3. Opperskalski S., Siew S., Tan E., Truscott L. (2019). Preferred Fiber & Materials Market Report, Textile Exchange
4. Sun D. (2019). An investigation into the performance viability of recycled polyester from recycled polyethylene terephthalate (R-PET), Journal of Textile Science & Fashion Technology10.33552/JTSFT.2019.02.000543 ↗
5. Unifipresentation at the Textile Exchange Conference in Milan. (2018).
6. IHSM presentation by Ashish Pujari. (2018). Highlights of a strong growth market - polyester fibers & PET and Textile Exchange estimates
7. Radhakrishnan S., Vetrivel P., Vinodkumar A., Palanisamy H. (2019). Recycled polyester – tool for savings in the use of virgin raw material, environmental footprints of recycled polyester, textile science and clothing technology10.1007/978-981-13-9578-9_3 ↗
8. Witek A., Wołosiewicz-Głąb M. (2014). Systemy optymalizacji recyklingu oraz transportu opadów tekstylnych, Logistyka Tom 4, 2014, Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz – Instytut Logistyki i Magazynowania
9. Pawul M., Kwiecień J.: Techniczne aspekty optymalizacji w gospodarce odpadami. Inżynieria Ekologiczna, nr 23/2010
10. Ravasio P. (2018). Recycled down: A sourcing best practise guideline for brands, processors and suppliers. European Outdoor Group
11. Bydełek A., Berdychowski M. (2018). Projekt koncepcyjny maszyny do odzysku puchu, „Inżynieria wytwarzania. red. M. Dudziak, A. Kołodziej, Kalisz, Wydawnictwo Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej im. Prezydenta Stanisława Wojciechowskiego w Kaliszu 15–26
12. Berdychowski M., Bydełek A. (2021). Research of material properties for the purposes of modeling the fabric destruction process. W: Polish-Slovak Scientific Conference on Machine Modelling and Simulations10.1051/matecconf/202235706002 ↗
13. Nistor E., Nistor GH., Bampidis V., Christodoulou VL. (2005). Geese and ducks feathers and down. Scientific Papers: Faculty of Agriculture (now Research Journal of Agricultural Science) XXXVII, 509–512
14. Hillinger C.: Down and dirty: Turning goose feathers into pillows is a cushy, but messy, occupation. Los Angeles Times
15. Down Feather Market Report by Product Type (Goose Down, Duck Down, Mixed Down) by Application / End User (Down Jacket, Down Quilt) by Industry Analysis, Volume, Share, Growth, Challenges, Trends and Forecast 2018–2026
16. Kim T., Jeon S., Lone S., Jun Doh S., Shin D-M., Kim H., Hwang Y-G., Hong S. (2018). Versatile nanodot-patterned Gore-Tex fabric for multiple energy harvesting in wearable and aerodynamic nanogenerators, Nano Energy 54, 209–21710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.067 ↗
17. Ehrmann A., Weber Marcus. (2013). Accuracy of thickness measurements on knitted fabrics., Melliand International
18. Arumugam V., Mishra R., Tunak M., Tomkova B., Militky J. (2018). Study on the in-plane shear performance of spacer fabrics in composite forming. Materials and Technology 52 ISSN 1580-2949 47–5010.17222/mit.2017.115 ↗
19. Taha I., Abdin Y., Ebeid S. (2013). Comparison of picture frame and bias-extension tests for the characterization of shear behaviour in natural fibre woven fabrics. Fibers and Polymers, 14, 338–34410.1007/s12221-013-0338-6 ↗
20. Komeili M. (2010). Multi-scale characterization and modeling of shear-tension interaction in woven fabrics for composite forming and structural applications. The University of British Columbia, 2010
21. J. Cao, R. Akkerman, P. Boisse, J. Chen, H.S. Cheng, E.F. de Graaf, J.L. Gorczyca, P. Harrison, G. Hivet, J. Launay, W. Lee, L. Liu, S.V. Lomov, A. Long, E. de Luycker, F. Morestin, J. Padvoiskis, X.Q. Peng, J. Sherwood, Tz. Stoilova, X.M. Tao, I. Verpoestf, A. Willems, J. Wiggers, T.X. Yu, B. Zhu. (2008). Characterization of mechanical behavior of woven fabrics: Experimental methods and benchmark results. Composites: Part A. 39 1037–105310.1016/j.compositesa.2008.02.016 ↗
22. Abaqus User's Manual, Version 6.14, Dassault systémes simulia corp. (2014). Fabric material behavior 23.4.1, *FABRIC: Specify the in-plane response of a fabric material. 6.1
23. Syerko E., Comas-Cardona S., Binetruy C. (2012). Models of mechanical properties/behavior of dry fibrous materials at various scales in bending and tension: A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 43(8)10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.012 ↗
24. Wojtkowiak D., Talaśka K. (2018). Modelling mechanical properties of the multilayer composite materials with the polyamide core. MATEC Web of Conferences, 157, s. 02052-1-02052-1210.1051/matecconf/201815702052 ↗
25. UNESCO-IHE, Institute for Water Education. (2005). The water footprint of cotton consumption, DADelft
26. Directive (EU) 2018/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment (Text with EEA relevance), PE/9/2018/REV/1
27. Urbańczyk G. W. (2002). Fizyka włókna. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej
28. Szałkowski Z. (1988). Poradnik inżyniera Włókiennictwo, Wydawnictwo Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa
29. Harrison P., Clifford M.J., Long A.C. (2004). Shear characterisation of viscous woven textile composites: A comparison between picture frame and bias extension experiments. Composites Science and Technolog, 64(10–11) 1453–146510.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.015 ↗
30. Gao X., Wang L. (2015). Finite element modelling for tensile behaviour of thermally bonded nonwoven fabric. AUTEX Research Journal, 15(1)10.2478/aut-2014-0035 ↗
31. EN 12935:2001. Feather and down — Hygiene and cleanliness requirements
32. EN ISO 527-4:2012. Plastics — Determination of tensile properties: Test conditions for isotropic and orthotropic fibre-reinforced plastic composites