A comparative study of chemical derivatisation methods for spatially differentiated cell adhesion on 2-dimensional microfabricated polymeric matrices
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper describes a study of surface derivatisation methods applied to two-dimensional polymer matrices microfabricated using the Pressure-Assisted Microsyringe (PAM) technique. A blend of polylactide and polycaprolactone was used as the matrix material, and surface chemistry techniques based on silanes and polyethyleneglycol (PEG) derivatives were employed to render the surface underlying the scaffold anti-adhesive whilst polylysine was covalently coupled to the surface of the polymer matrix to enhance cell adhesion. Prior to cell-adhesion tests, the surfaces and matrices were analysed using physico-chemical techniques, such as surface tension, surface potential and fluorescence. Adhesion of primary endothelial cells was evaluated using cell counting techniques. The results demonstrate that both PEGs and silanes are about 66% efficient at demarcating endothelial cell adhesion in short term experiments and that covalently-bound polylysine to the polymer matrix increases cell adhesion twofold with respect to the adsorbed polypeptide.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Kane R. S. · Biomaterials · 1999 · 20 · 236310.1016/S0142-9612(99)00165-9 ↗
2. Thomas C. H. · J. Biomech. Eng. · 1999 · 121 · 4010.1115/1.2798041 ↗
3. Giordano R. A. · J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn · 1996 · 8 · 6310.1163/156856297X00588 ↗
4. Zein I. · Biomaterials · 2002 · 23 · 116910.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0 ↗
5. Vozzi G. · Tissue Eng. · 2003 · 8 · 108910.1089/107632702320934182 ↗
6. Balwas A. S. · Biomaterials · 1988 · 19 · 59510.1016/S0142-9612(97)00218-4 ↗
7. Hasenbein M. E. · Biomaterials · 2002 · 23 · 393710.1016/S0142-9612(02)00129-1 ↗
8. Scotchford C. A. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1998 · 41 · 43110.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<431::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
9. Bhatia S. N. · Biomed. Microdevices · 1999 · 2 · 13110.1023/A:1009949704750 ↗
10. Bhatia S. N. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1997 · 34 · 18910.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199702)34:2<189::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
11. Folch A. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2000 · 52 · 34610.1002/1097-4636(200011)52:2<346::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
12. Lu L. · Biomaterials · 1999 · 20 · 235110.1016/S0142-9612(99)00164-7 ↗
13. Rezania A. · Ann. Biomed. Eng. · 1997 · 25 · 19010.1007/BF02738550 ↗
14. Turner D. C. · Biophys. J. · 1995 · 69 · 278210.1016/S0006-3495(95)80151-7 ↗
15. Kumar A. · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 149810.1021/la00017a030 ↗
16. Tiller J. C. · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2001 · 73 · 24610.1002/bit.1057 ↗
17. Liu V. A. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 60 · 12610.1002/jbm.10005 ↗
18. Patel N. · FASEB J. · 1998 · 12 · 144710.1096/fasebj.12.14.1447 ↗
19. Park A. · J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn · 1998 · 9 · 8910.1163/156856298X00451 ↗
20. Previti A. · 2000
21. Rouxhet L. · J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn · 1998 · 9 · 127910.1163/156856298X00398 ↗
22. LeBaron R. G. · Tissue Eng. · 2000 · 6 · 8510.1089/107632700320720 ↗
23. Sorribas H. · Biomaterials · 2002 · 23 · 89310.1016/S0142-9612(01)00199-5 ↗
24. Mazia D. · J. Cell. Biol. · 1975 · 66 · 19810.1083/jcb.66.1.198 ↗
25. Weetal H. H. · 1975
26. Andrade J. D. · 1985 · 110.1007/978-1-4684-8610-0 ↗
27. Ahluwalia A. · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2001 · 12 · 61310.1023/A:1011241727138 ↗
28. Johnstone A. P. · 1996
29. Russ J. C. · 1999
30. Cam D. · Biomaterials · 1995 · 16 · 83310.1016/0142-9612(95)94144-A ↗
31. Morra M. · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 465810.1021/la981345m ↗
32. Tziampazis E. · Biomaterials · 2000 · 21 · 51110.1016/S0142-9612(99)00212-4 ↗
33. den Braber E. T. · Biomaterials · 1996 · 17 · 109310.1016/0142-9612(96)85910-2 ↗