journal article·2016-07-02

Inhibition of postsurgical adhesions by methylene blue-loaded nanofibers versus cast film matrices

Nesma El-Sayed, Sally Galal, Hanan El-Gowelli, Labiba El-Khordagui

Publisher page

Abstract

In the quest for barrier membranes for the prevention of post-surgical tissue adhesions, polymer matrices may provide a platform of biomaterials with versatile properties. However, the relationship between the anti-adhesion effects of different polymer matrices and their physicochemical and structural properties is not yet adequately understood. In a preclinical study using a rat cecum model, we directly compared the anti-adhesion potential of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) electrospun nanofibrous versus cast film matrices loaded with methylene blue (MB) as antioxidant adhesion inhibitor. PHB retained MB presumably forming MB-bioactivated matrices. In the preclinical study, quantitative morphologic assessment in addition to histopathologic and SEM examinations 14 days post-surgery indicated that plain PHB NFs and MB-PHB NFs, moderately enhanced cecal wall healing and inhibited adhesion formation. In contrast, reshaping PHB as cast films, significantly enhanced healing, reduced adhesion bands and prevented inter-visceral adhesions. Cast films also inhibited tissue attachment to the matrix recovered 14 days post-surgery. Both PHB matrix types reduced tissue inflammation. Despite tissue anti-adhesion potential of individual matrix components, modulation of the micro-architectural properties generated polymer barriers with varying tissue anti-adhesion and healing potentials, the MB-loaded cast film achieving the best outcome.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00464-002-9208-910.1007/s00464-002-9208-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.01910.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.019 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.02010.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.020 ↗
4. 10.1159/00008786910.1159/000087869 ↗
5. 10.1038/srep0766810.1038/srep07668 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jss.2008.11.83910.1016/j.jss.2008.11.839 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.00110.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.001 ↗
8. 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.5110.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.51 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.00210.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.01410.1016/j.jss.2011.10.014 ↗
11. Lo H-Y · Artif. Organs · 2010 · 34 · 64810.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00949.x ↗
12. 10.1002/(ISSN)1552-496510.1002/(ISSN)1552-4965 ↗
13. 10.7150/ijms.560710.7150/ijms.5607 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.b.3293710.1002/jbm.b.32937 ↗
15. 10.1039/c3tb20795a10.1039/c3tb20795a ↗
16. 10.1155/2013/49570810.1155/2013/495708 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.01110.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.011 ↗
18. 10.3390/ijms1604693210.3390/ijms16046932 ↗
19. 10.1166/jbn.2015.208010.1166/jbn.2015.2080 ↗
20. 10.5114/fn.2013.3595810.5114/fn.2013.35958 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.04010.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.040 ↗
22. 10.2174/138161282166615030215242010.2174/1381612821666150302152420 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.08.02610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.08.026 ↗
24. 10.3390/ijms14061186110.3390/ijms140611861 ↗
25. 10.1080/09168451.2015.103465110.1080/09168451.2015.1034651 ↗
26. 10.1021/bm401572a10.1021/bm401572a ↗
27. 10.1159/00006703510.1159/000067035 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.015 ↗
29. 10.3109/11024150075000865510.3109/110241500750008655 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jss.2006.11.01210.1016/j.jss.2006.11.012 ↗
31. Dinc S · Can. J. Surg · 2006 · 49 · 321
32. 10.1159/00012954810.1159/000129548 ↗
33. 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-392710.1002/(ISSN)1521-3927 ↗
34. 10.1002/(ISSN)1552-498110.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981 ↗
35. 10.1039/c2jm31069d10.1039/c2jm31069d ↗
36. 10.1002/jbm.a.v102.310.1002/jbm.a.v102.3 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.03.00410.1016/j.ejps.2014.03.004 ↗
38. 10.1177/088391150607357010.1177/0883911506073570 ↗
39. Pillay V · J. Nanomaterials · 2013 · 789289 · 22
40. 10.1021/bm100912v10.1021/bm100912v ↗
41. 10.1590/S1516-8913201100040001910.1590/S1516-89132011000400019 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00240-910.1016/S0141-3910(02)00240-9 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.00810.1016/j.watres.2004.12.008 ↗
44. Mohammed MA · Res. J. Chem. Sci · 2014 · 4 · 91
45. 10.1007/s40097-015-0158-x10.1007/s40097-015-0158-x ↗
46. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.02.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.02.020 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.03.00210.1016/j.ejpb.2011.03.002 ↗
48. 10.1002/(ISSN)1552-498110.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.surg.2009.12.00910.1016/j.surg.2009.12.009 ↗
50. 10.1093/humrep/17.4.103910.1093/humrep/17.4.1039 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jss.2006.05.00610.1016/j.jss.2006.05.006 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10856-007-3345-610.1007/s10856-007-3345-6 ↗
53. Cho WJ · J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med · 2010 · 7 · 49