Mimicking techniques in small diameter vascular grafts: enhancing design through multi-layered electrospinning techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of occlusive arterial diseases, such as peripheral arterial disease and coronary heart disease, underscores the critical need for effective vascular interventions. Traditional methods, including autologous vessel grafting, often fall short in the case of small-diameter vascular grafts (SDVGs), which present challenges such as thrombosis and limited long-term patency. This study reviews recent advancements in electrospinning techniques aimed at generating biomimetic SDVGs that closely replicate the structure and mechanical properties of natural blood vessels. By employing multi-layered electrospinning approaches, the review investigates strategies to enhance scaffold design, improve biocompatibility, and integrate bioactive components. The potential of novel drug delivery systems and advanced porogenic technologies is also explored, revealing a pathway to create next-generation electrospun vascular grafts that promise improved integration with host tissues and a substantial impact on cardiovascular therapies. This review highlights the ongoing efforts within the field of tissue engineering to address the pressing challenges associated with small-diameter vascular grafts, facilitating better patient outcomes, and expanding therapeutic options.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Silk-based biomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Textiles, Donghua University
Textile Engineering Department, Ethiopian Institute of Textile and Fashion technology, Bahir Dar University
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.10970110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109701 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11247410.1016/j.msec.2021.112474 ↗
3. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0035610.3389/fbioe.2019.00356 ↗
4. 10.3390/jfb1003003010.3390/jfb10030030 ↗
5. 10.1186/s12889-021-10429-010.1186/s12889-021-10429-0 ↗
6. 10.3390/nano1001011910.3390/nano10010119 ↗
7. 10.3390/nano1001011910.3390/nano10010119 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20231366410.1002/adfm.202313664 ↗
9. 10.3390/membranes801001510.3390/membranes8010015 ↗
10. 10.33549/physiolres.93529410.33549/physiolres.935294 ↗
11. 10.1177/0391398821105175810.1177/03913988211051758 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.06310.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.063 ↗
13. 10.3390/designs301001910.3390/designs3010019 ↗
14. 10.1089/wound.2024.002410.1089/wound.2024.0024 ↗
15. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-007610.1515/ntrev-2020-0076 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41569-019-0249-310.1038/s41569-019-0249-3 ↗
17. Canaud B, Ponce P, Parisotto MT, et al. Vascular access management for haemodialysis: a value-based approach from NephroCare experience. IntechOpen. Rijeka; 2019.
18. 10.3389/fbioe.2018.0004110.3389/fbioe.2018.00041 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mattod.2024.06.00410.1016/j.mattod.2024.06.004 ↗
20. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.68307910.3389/fbioe.2021.683079 ↗
21. 10.1007/s42765-022-00170-710.1007/s42765-022-00170-7 ↗
22. 10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.011910.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0119 ↗
23. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx09510.1093/eurheartj/ehx095 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12897310.1016/j.matlet.2020.128973 ↗
25. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.72184310.3389/fbioe.2021.721843 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1622723110.3390/ma16227231 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1622723110.3390/ma16227231 ↗
28. 10.1002/adhm.20230443210.1002/adhm.202304432 ↗
29. 10.3390/jfb1301001110.3390/jfb13010011 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1412230710.3390/polym14122307 ↗
31. 10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.70910.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.12.01510.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.12.015 ↗
33. 10.1186/s13036-022-00286-910.1186/s13036-022-00286-9 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-3-319-71530-8_21-110.1007/978-3-319-71530-8_21-1 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20191081110.1002/adfm.201910811 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.08.01910.1016/j.cellsig.2018.08.019 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.06710.1016/j.msec.2018.12.067 ↗
38. 10.1088/1748-605X/ab550c10.1088/1748-605X/ab550c ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20210564510.1002/adma.202105645 ↗
40. 10.3390/polym1501007210.3390/polym15010072 ↗
41. 10.2174/011381612829593524042510150910.2174/0113816128295935240425101509 ↗
42. Hassabo AG, Gouda NZ, Khaleed N, et al. Natural polymers in medical textiles. J Tex Col Polym Sci. 2024;21(1):131–147.
43. 10.1007/s10439-021-02728-910.1007/s10439-021-02728-9 ↗
44. 10.1007/s12221-022-0228-x10.1007/s12221-022-0228-x ↗
45. 10.1007/s13726-021-00983-010.1007/s13726-021-00983-0 ↗
46. 10.1177/088532821987317410.1177/0885328219873174 ↗
47. 10.3390/polym1521424410.3390/polym15214244 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10561-020-09837-010.1007/s10561-020-09837-0 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11071710.1016/j.msec.2020.110717 ↗
50. 10.1088/1748-605X/ab874310.1088/1748-605X/ab8743 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41392-021-00512-810.1038/s41392-021-00512-8 ↗
52. 10.3390/ijms1903074510.3390/ijms19030745 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41578-021-00362-410.1038/s41578-021-00362-4 ↗
54. 10.3389/fbioe.2024.141351810.3389/fbioe.2024.1413518 ↗
55. 10.3390/nano1101002110.3390/nano11010021 ↗
56. 10.4103/1673-5374.20859710.4103/1673-5374.208597 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12028810.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120288 ↗
58. 10.3389/fcvm.2020.59236110.3389/fcvm.2020.592361 ↗
59. 10.1186/s40824-023-00399-210.1186/s40824-023-00399-2 ↗
60. 10.1007/s12221-019-8735-010.1007/s12221-019-8735-0 ↗
61. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.108123310.3389/fbioe.2022.1081233 ↗
62. 10.1166/jbt.2011.101510.1166/jbt.2011.1015 ↗
63. 10.1007/s10853-020-04510-z10.1007/s10853-020-04510-z ↗
64. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11224810.1016/j.msec.2021.112248 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.06210.1016/j.msec.2018.04.062 ↗
66. 10.1002/mdp2.20310.1002/mdp2.203 ↗
67. 10.3390/bioengineering704016010.3390/bioengineering7040160 ↗
68. 10.3390/bioengineering704016010.3390/bioengineering7040160 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13731810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137318 ↗
70. 10.1007/s40204-019-0111-z10.1007/s40204-019-0111-z ↗
71. 10.3390/ijms2214728410.3390/ijms22147284 ↗
72. Meneses AL. Skeletal muscle microvascular blood flow as a potential treatment target for exercise intolerance in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Queensland: University of the Sunshine Coast; 2019.
73. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.00910.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.009 ↗
74. 10.3390/ma1515545710.3390/ma15155457 ↗
75. 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.015810.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0158 ↗
76. 10.1088/2051-672X/ab7c3010.1088/2051-672X/ab7c30 ↗
77. 10.1089/ten.TEC.2019.009810.1089/ten.TEC.2019.0098 ↗
78. 10.1177/0892705723121446810.1177/08927057231214468 ↗
79. 10.2174/012210315528436524010306302410.2174/0122103155284365240103063024 ↗
80. 10.1007/978-3-319-96445-4_610.1007/978-3-319-96445-4_6 ↗
81. 10.1177/088532821140894610.1177/0885328211408946 ↗
82. 10.1186/s42252-020-00012-y10.1186/s42252-020-00012-y ↗
83. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11213510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112135 ↗
84. 10.3390/nano1008160910.3390/nano10081609 ↗
85. 10.3390/polym1211263610.3390/polym12112636 ↗
86. O’Connor RA. Electrospinning of tissue engineered blood vessel scaffolds utilising multimodal fibre distributions and dynamic liquid collected yarns. Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland. 2018.
87. 10.1007/s13239-020-00482-y10.1007/s13239-020-00482-y ↗
88. 10.1111/den.1304110.1111/den.13041 ↗
89. 10.1007/s40204-020-00144-110.1007/s40204-020-00144-1 ↗
90. 10.3390/membranes1210092910.3390/membranes12100929 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10807910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108079 ↗
92. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0011710.3389/fbioe.2019.00117 ↗
93. 10.1007/s10439-018-02171-310.1007/s10439-018-02171-3 ↗
94. 10.1371/journal.pone.018591610.1371/journal.pone.0185916 ↗
95. 10.1002/adhm.20170146110.1002/adhm.201701461 ↗
96. 10.61873/KJDF489310.61873/KJDF4893 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10072110.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100721 ↗
98. 10.1039/C5CS90066B10.1039/C5CS90066B ↗
99. 10.1039/C4CS00483C]10.1039/C4CS00483C] ↗
100. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.07010.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.070 ↗