Enhancing bioactivity of Callistemon citrinus (Curtis) essential oil through novel nanoemulsion formulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The main focus of this study was to create a stable and efficient nanoemulsion (NE) using Callistemon citrinus essential oil (EO). Various factors affecting the NE’s stability were optimized including oil %, Tween 80%, time of sonication, and its accelerated stability was examined. The research also considered the antibacterial, antifungal, and larvicidal effects of the optimized NE (B10). The optimum NE stood out for its stability, featuring a particle size of 33.15 ± 0.32 nm. Analysis via IR spectroscopy confirmed successful EO encapsulation in B10. The formulation remained stable for six months, with B10 showing significantly higher antibacterial and antifungal potency compared to the pure oil. When samples were subjected to tests against Fusarium oxysporum, B10 exhibited a MIC value of 62.5 mg/mL, whereas the pure oil showed a MIC value of 250 mg/mL. This indicates that the B10 formulation was 50 times more effective than the EO. In terms of antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli, the MIC value was 0.256 mg/mL for B10 and 4 mg/mL for the EO. Also, pure oil and B10 displayed larvicidal effects against Chilo suppressalis (Walker) larvae, with B10 eliminating 95.2% of larvae in 48 h. Overall, stable and optimum C. citrinus NE with its strong antimicrobial qualities, shows promise as an effective fungicide and insecticide.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity · Phytochemistry and Biological Activities · Moringa oleifera research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad-e Kavus, Iran
Funding
University of Mazandaran
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.02.01210.1016/j.indcrop.2013.02.012 ↗
2. 10.3390/molecules1406199010.3390/molecules14061990 ↗
3. 10.1186/1472-6882-11-9910.1186/1472-6882-11-99 ↗
4. 10.1590/S0100-4042201000010001910.1590/S0100-40422010000100019 ↗
5. 10.4103/0972-9062.14176310.4103/0972-9062.141763 ↗
6. Pierre DYS, Nchiwan NE, Okechukwu EC, et al. Larvicidal and pupicidal toxicities of Plectranthus glandulosus and Callistemon rigidus leaf essential oils against three mosquito species. J Mosq Res. 2014;4(2):5–14.
7. 10.1016/j.bse.2004.10.01010.1016/j.bse.2004.10.010 ↗
8. 10.5530/pc.2012.3.1110.5530/pc.2012.3.11 ↗
9. 10.3390/plants908104510.3390/plants9081045 ↗
10. 10.22270/jddt.v14i6.663910.22270/jddt.v14i6.6639 ↗
11. 10.32381/JPSR.2022.38.01.4010.32381/JPSR.2022.38.01.40 ↗
12. 10.1371/journal.pone.027008410.1371/journal.pone.0270084 ↗
13. Netala S, Penmetsa R, Nakka S, et al. Pharmacognostic study of Callistemon citrinus L. bark. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7:427–430.
14. 10.1080/13102818.2019.161661510.1080/13102818.2019.1616615 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.10610.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106 ↗
16. 10.1080/10412905.2020.174669810.1080/10412905.2020.1746698 ↗
17. 10.1515/znc-2020-003810.1515/znc-2020-0038 ↗
18. 10.1134/S106816202304020910.1134/S1068162023040209 ↗
19. 10.1080/0972060X.2023.223439810.1080/0972060X.2023.2234398 ↗
20. 10.3389/fsufs.2021.65342010.3389/fsufs.2021.653420 ↗
21. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.75106210.3389/fmicb.2021.751062 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10311-020-01142-210.1007/s10311-020-01142-2 ↗
23. 10.3390/pr709061710.3390/pr7090617 ↗
24. 10.1080/09205063.2023.223084310.1080/09205063.2023.2230843 ↗
25. 10.12944/CRNFSJ.6.3.0510.12944/CRNFSJ.6.3.05 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.02310.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.023 ↗
27. 10.4103/0975-8453.5950910.4103/0975-8453.59509 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10311-021-01216-910.1007/s10311-021-01216-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.10406410.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104064 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-022-14591-210.1038/s41598-022-14591-2 ↗
31. 10.1080/09205063.2023.225358410.1080/09205063.2023.2253584 ↗
32. Zhang Z McClements DJ. Chapter 2 – overview of nanoemulsion properties: stability rheology and appearance. In: Jafari SM McClements DJBT-N editors. Nanoemulsions. Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2018. p. 21–49. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012811838200002310.1016/B978-0-12-811838-2.00002-3 ↗
33. 10.3390/cosmetics1101002910.3390/cosmetics11010029 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.10100410.1016/j.jafr.2024.101004 ↗
35. Mir S, Bhat MA, Bashir A, et al. Present status and future prospects of marker assisted selection for sheath blight resistance breeding in rice (Oryza sativa L.). SKUAST J Res. 2015;17:72–90.
36. Yfanti P, Patakioutas G, Douma D, et al. In vitro antifungal activity of Satureja horvatii ssp. macrophylla against 3 tomato phytopathogenic fungi. Nat Prod Commun. 2021;16(7):1934578X211025165.
37. 10.3390/agronomy1407150710.3390/agronomy14071507 ↗
38. 10.3390/plants812053810.3390/plants8120538 ↗
39. 10.1584/jpestics.J19-0310.1584/jpestics.J19-03 ↗
40. 10.3390/microbiolres1403006210.3390/microbiolres14030062 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11843510.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118435 ↗
42. 10.3390/ijms24181436110.3390/ijms241814361 ↗
43. 10.1603/022.038.013210.1603/022.038.0132 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cbd.2021.10090310.1016/j.cbd.2021.100903 ↗
45. 10.1007/s41348-023-00762-410.1007/s41348-023-00762-4 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11578610.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115786 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.10557510.1016/j.cropro.2021.105575 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.13910.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.139 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.03.01810.1016/j.lwt.2016.03.018 ↗
50. 10.1080/10412905.2024.231614310.1080/10412905.2024.2316143 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.02010.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.020 ↗
52. 10.1166/jnn.2013.670110.1166/jnn.2013.6701 ↗
53. CLSI W. Clinical and laboratory standards institute methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approv Stand M7-A7 CLSI 7th ed. PA USA; 2006.
54. 10.1111/jam.1470410.1111/jam.14704 ↗
55. WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. World Heal Organ. 2005:1–41. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2005/WHO_CDS_WHOPES_GCDPP_2005.13
56. 10.1111/jfbc.1376710.1111/jfbc.13767 ↗
57. 10.1080/0972060X.2012.1064410910.1080/0972060X.2012.10644109 ↗
58. Bhandari NL, Khadka S, Dhungana BR, et al. Study of phyto-and physicochemical analysis, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oil extract of Callistemon citrinus (curtis) skeels leaves. Adv J Chem B. 2021;3:109–119.
59. 10.1021/jf503436610.1021/jf5034366 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.20310.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.203 ↗
61. 10.3390/molecules2819691010.3390/molecules28196910 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.07710.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.077 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.19510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.195 ↗
64. 10.1155/2022/161614910.1155/2022/1616149 ↗
65. 10.1038/s41598-018-24871-510.1038/s41598-018-24871-5 ↗
66. 10.1177/1082013221106947010.1177/10820132211069470 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.12996310.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129963 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.10938810.1016/j.lwt.2020.109388 ↗
69. 10.1038/s41598-022-07676-510.1038/s41598-022-07676-5 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.00510.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.005 ↗
71. 10.3109/10717544.2014.93328410.3109/10717544.2014.933284 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.07710.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.077 ↗
73. 10.1007/s13204-014-0398-y10.1007/s13204-014-0398-y ↗
74. 10.17582/journal.pjn/2022/40.1.35.4810.17582/journal.pjn/2022/40.1.35.48 ↗
75. 10.3390/insects1102012810.3390/insects11020128 ↗
76. Fan P, Gu Z, Xu D, et al. Action analysis of drops of emamection-benzoate microemulsion on rice leaf. Chinese J Rice Sci. 2010;24:503–508.