journal article·2015-05-03

Star-shaped PCL/PLLA blended fiber membrane via electrospinning

Haotian Li, Tiankui Qiao, Ping Song, HuiLing Guo, Xiaofeng Song, Baochang Zhang, Xuesi Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

Electrospun fiber mesh has been a candidate for guided bone regeneration membrane. However, its poor mechanics property has been limited in clinical application. In this study, various star-shaped poly(ε-caprolactones) (PCLs) are successfully synthesized by ring-opening polymerization and mixed with poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) to be made into blended membranes through electrospinning. Their corresponding properties are evaluated including morphology, thermodynamics, mechanics, and cytotoxicity. The blended fibers show smooth surface and well-distributed structure, which have slight differences in morphology with the change of arm number of star-shaped PCL. Crystallization of the fibrous membrane is influenced by star-shaped PCLs. Glass temperature drops from 64.23 °C for pure PLLA membrane to 53.62-49 °C for the blended membranes. The membranous tensile strength is depended strongly on star-shaped PCLs. The tensile strength goes up with arm number increasing; on the contrary, at the same arm number, the mechanics strength decreases with molecular weight increasing. And the fibrous membrane containing 20 wt.% star-shaped PCL shows better mechanics property compared to the other membranes. The star-shaped PCL/PLLA fiber membrane is not cytotoxicity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/am201795g10.1021/am201795g ↗
2. Jones GL · Osteoblast: osteoclast co-cultures on silk fibroin, chitosan and PLLA films · 2009 · 30 · 5376
3. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.01410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.014 ↗
4. 10.1002/(ISSN)1439-205410.1002/(ISSN)1439-2054 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.11.01310.1016/j.msec.2008.11.013 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.01510.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.015 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.02810.1016/j.msec.2014.07.028 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10856-008-3664-210.1007/s10856-008-3664-2 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.a.v88a:310.1002/jbm.a.v88a:3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.014 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.02310.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.00710.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.007 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.02410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.024 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00149-310.1016/S0141-3910(97)00149-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.02010.1016/j.msec.2014.09.020 ↗
16. 10.1163/092050610X51053310.1163/092050610X510533 ↗
17. 10.1080/09205063.2012.70941710.1080/09205063.2012.709417 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.3259010.1002/app.32590 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.08310.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.083 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.07.05010.1016/j.polymer.2006.07.050 ↗
21. 10.1021/bm060725g10.1021/bm060725g ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.04710.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.047 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.04.00510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.04.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.02810.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.028 ↗
25. Song XF · Acta Polym. Sinica · 2013 · 1 · 95
26. 10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60143-110.1016/S1672-6529(11)60143-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.01210.1016/j.joen.2014.09.012 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.012 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.05.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.05.016 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.02.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.02.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.09.00910.1016/j.tripleo.2003.09.009 ↗
33. 10.1053/joms.2002.3610810.1053/joms.2002.36108 ↗
34. 10.1166/jbn.2013.168710.1166/jbn.2013.1687 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10856-012-4832-y10.1007/s10856-012-4832-y ↗