Limited V-shaped cement augmentation of the proximal femur to prevent secondary hip fractures
Source abstract
Abstract
Patients with a femoral fracture due to osteoporosis are at high risk of sustaining a secondary fracture on the contralateral side. A prophylactic mechanical reinforcement of the contralateral side during operation of the initial fracture could be of interest for such patients. This biomechanical in vitro study investigates the potential of a limited V-shaped bone cement augmentation to prevent secondary hip fractures by targeting the areas of the proximal femur with the highest stresses during a fall. Five pairs of human cadaveric proximal femora were tested in a configuration simulating a fall on the greater trochanter. The femoral neck of one specimen of each pair was augmented with 8–14 ml polymethylmethacrylate from the lateral cortex towards inferior and superior, spanning a V-shaped cement pattern. Clinical relevant fractures were generated with a 45 kg mass in controlled free fall. Load-displacement data were recorded and energy to fracture, fracture load, yield load and stiffness were statistically evaluated. Augmented samples absorbed 124% more energy until fracture compared to their controls ( p = 0.043). No significant differences were found between the two groups for fracture load ( p = 0.5), yield load ( p = 0.35) and stiffness ( p = 0.5). Biomechanically, a limited V-shaped prophylactic cement augmentation carries potential to prevent secondary hip fractures indicated by increased energy absorption until fracture. Further investigations are necessary to minimize interference with the biology and to maximize the mechanical benefit of prophylactic augmentation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hip and Femur Fractures · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Bone health and osteoporosis research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Biomedical Services, AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
Department of Traumatology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/1471-2474-11-4810.1186/1471-2474-11-48 ↗
2. 10.1185/0300799080211579610.1185/03007990802115796 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00198-002-1327-610.1007/s00198-002-1327-6 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00198-007-0375-310.1007/s00198-007-0375-3 ↗
5. Ryg J, Rejnmark L, Overgaard S, et al. Hip fracture patients at risk of second hip fracture. A nationwide population-based cohort study of 169,145 cases during 1977-2001. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24(7): 1299–1307.10.1359/jbmr.090207 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00223990044610.1007/s002239900446 ↗
7. Marks R · Int J Gen Med · 2010 · 3 · 1
8. 10.1016/0020-1383(76)90041-310.1016/0020-1383(76)90041-3 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00223990067910.1007/s002239900679 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00198-010-1359-210.1007/s00198-010-1359-2 ↗
11. 10.2106/JBJS.G.0086410.2106/JBJS.G.00864 ↗
12. Solomon DH, Brookhart MA, Tsao P, et al. Predictors of very low adherence with medications for osteoporosis: towards development of a clinical prediction rule. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22(6): 1737–1743.10.1007/s00198-010-1381-4 ↗
13. 10.2165/11531040-000000000-0000010.2165/11531040-000000000-00000 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00132-003-0574-310.1007/s00132-003-0574-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.00910.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.08.00610.1016/j.medengphy.2006.08.006 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.01410.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.01.014 ↗
18. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b5c0c610.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b5c0c6 ↗
19. 10.1016/0020-1383(89)90082-X10.1016/0020-1383(89)90082-X ↗
20. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.03910.1016/j.bone.2007.08.039 ↗
21. Mueller M, Nazarian S, Koch P, et al. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990.10.1007/978-3-642-61261-9_1 ↗
22. Beckmann J, Springorum R, Vettorazzi E, et al. Fracture prevention by femoroplasty-cement augmentation of the proximal femur. J Orthop Res 2011; 29(11): 1753–1758.10.1002/jor.21410 ↗
23. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180616ba510.1097/BOT.0b013e3180616ba5 ↗
24. van der Steenhoven TJ, Schaasberg W, de Vries AC, et al. Elastomer femoroplasty prevents hip fracture displacement. In vitro biomechanical study comparing two minimal invasive femoroplasty techniques. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011; 26(5): 464–469.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.00110.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.001 ↗
26. 10.1002/jor.110013062110.1002/jor.1100130621 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.02010.1016/j.bone.2009.10.020 ↗
28. 10.1210/jc.2004-156810.1210/jc.2004-1568 ↗
29. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b01dce10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b01dce ↗
30. 10.1097/00005131-200205000-0000310.1097/00005131-200205000-00003 ↗
31. 10.1002/jor.2029910.1002/jor.20299 ↗
32. 10.5402/2011/78051010.5402/2011/780510 ↗
33. 10.1002/jbm.b.3135310.1002/jbm.b.31353 ↗
34. Backman S. The proximal end of the femur: investigations with special reference to the etiology of femoral neck fractures; anatomical studies; roentgen projections; theoretical stress calculations; experimental production of fractures. Acta Radiol Suppl 1957; (146): 1–166.
35. 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00134-410.1016/0021-9290(95)00134-4 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.02.00110.1016/j.medengphy.2005.02.001 ↗
37. 10.1126/science.99654910.1126/science.996549 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)00046-210.1016/S0736-0266(00)00046-2 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0250864110.1007/BF02508641 ↗
40. 10.1016/0379-0738(94)90265-810.1016/0379-0738(94)90265-8 ↗