journal article·2022-04Open access

Multi-layered electrospinning and electrospraying approach: Effect of polymeric supplements on chondrocyte suspension

Ângela Semitela, Andreia Leal Pereira, Cátia Sousa, Alexandrina F. Mendes, Paula A.A.P. Marques, António Completo

Abstract

Articular cartilage was expected to be one of the first tissues to be successfully engineered, but replicating the complex fibril architecture and the cellular distribution of the native cartilage has proven difficult. While electrospinning has been widely used to reproduce the depth-dependent fibre architecture in 3D scaffolds, the chondrocyte-controlled distribution remains an unsolved problem. To incorporate cells homogeneously through the depth of scaffolds, a combination of polymer electrospinning and cell seeding is necessary. A multi-layer approach alternating between polymer electrospinning with chondrocyte electrospraying can be a solution. Still, the success of this process is related to the survival rate of the electrosprayed chondrocytes embedded within the electrospun mesh. In this regard, the present study investigated the impact of the multi-layered process and the supplementation of the electrospray chondrocyte suspension with different concentrations of Gelatin and Alginate on the viability of electrosprayed chondrocytes embedded within a Polycaprolactone/Gelatin electrospun mesh and on the mechanical properties of the resulting meshes. The addition of Gelatin in the chondrocyte suspension did not increase significantly ( p > 0.05) the percentage of viable electrosprayed chondrocytes (25%), while 3 wt% Alginate addition led to a significant ( p < 0.05) increase in chondrocyte viability (50%) relative to the case without polymer supplement (15%). Furthermore, the addition of both polymer supplements increased the mechanical properties of the multi-layer construct. These findings imply that this multi-layered approach can be applied to cartilage TE allowing for automated chondrocyte integration during scaffolds creation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Mechanical Technology and Automation (TEMA), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

Centre for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization · Science and Technology Foundation

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v37.i1-2.1010.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v37.i1-2.10 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-10043110.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100431 ↗
3. Kazemnejad S · Avicenna J Med Biotechnol · 2017 · 9
4. 10.3390/ijms1903074510.3390/ijms19030745 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.01910.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.019 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.00910.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.07.00110.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.07.001 ↗
9. 10.3390/jfb1003003010.3390/jfb10030030 ↗
10. 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.022110.1089/ten.tec.2008.0221 ↗
11. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.048410.1089/ten.tea.2010.0484 ↗
12. 10.1021/bm800565u10.1021/bm800565u ↗
13. 10.1002/adhm.20110000110.1002/adhm.201100001 ↗
14. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318168db3e10.1097/SAP.0b013e318168db3e ↗
15. 10.2147/IJN.S8431210.2147/IJN.S84312 ↗
16. 10.1002/mabi.20110010810.1002/mabi.201100108 ↗
17. 10.1039/c4an00766b10.1039/c4an00766b ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.012 ↗
19. 10.22203/eCM.v021a2910.22203/eCM.v021a29 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.01210.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.012 ↗
21. 10.1002/jor.2270110.1002/jor.22701 ↗
22. 10.3233/CH-2012-160810.3233/CH-2012-1608 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.2706310.1002/app.27063 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.020 ↗
25. 10.3390/gels301000610.3390/gels3010006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.020 ↗
27. 10.1177/088532822094019410.1177/0885328220940194 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.08210.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.082 ↗
29. 10.1002/jbm.b.3012810.1002/jbm.b.30128 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10856-020-06407-410.1007/s10856-020-06407-4 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10437310.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104373 ↗
32. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x ↗
33. 10.1371/journal.pone.020359510.1371/journal.pone.0203595 ↗
34. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100431-9.00015-210.1016/B978-0-08-100431-9.00015-2 ↗
35. 10.1208/s12249-010-9547-010.1208/s12249-010-9547-0 ↗
36. 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/5/05201210.1088/1742-6596/1073/5/052012 ↗
37. 10.1080/15421406.2012.63432910.1080/15421406.2012.634329 ↗
38. 10.3109/0265673890914049710.3109/02656738909140497 ↗
39. 10.1039/C8RA01059E10.1039/C8RA01059E ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msec.2012.07.02410.1016/j.msec.2012.07.024 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10811-008-9317-510.1007/s10811-008-9317-5 ↗
42. 10.1089/ten.tec.2019.011610.1089/ten.tec.2019.0116 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.joca.2008.02.00510.1016/j.joca.2008.02.005 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.01610.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.016 ↗
45. 10.1088/1758-5082/5/1/01500110.1088/1758-5082/5/1/015001 ↗
46. 10.3109/03008207.2015.106677910.3109/03008207.2015.1066779 ↗