Fabrication of a PDMS-based substrate with a stiffness gradient for modeling the mechanical microenvironment in single and collective cell studies
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanotransduction plays a pivotal role in shaping cellular behavior including migration, differentiation, and proliferation. To investigate this mechanism more accurately further, this study came up with a novel elastomeric substrate with a stiffness gradient using a sugar-based replica molding technique combined with a two-layer PDMS system. The efficient water solubility of candy allows easy release, creating a smooth substrate. By adjusting the substrate’s thickness, the optimal effective gradient length for the study is achievable. Additionally, adjusting substrate thickness precisely controls stiffness, from very soft to hard-tissue-like rigidity. Atomic force microscopy characterization confirmed a continuous stiffness gradient on three commonly used PDMS mixtures, 1:30, 1:50, and 1:75, demonstrating the versatility of this method for fabricating and tuning substrates to mimic various tissue environments. In cellular experiments, 3T3 fibroblast cells exhibited a significant migratory response toward the 1:50/1:75 two-layer stiffness gradient, with cells migrating preferably in stiffer directions. Its cost-effectiveness, smooth surface, and ability to regulate gradient substrates with varied stiffness via different PDMS combinations are key advantages. By precisely replicating physiologically relevant mechanical microenvironments, this method advances mechanobiology research and facilitates modeling of stiffness-guided cellular behaviors, paving the way for reliable tissue engineering and regenerative medicine studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Montreal
Amirkabir University of Technology
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cobme.2020.10026010.1016/j.cobme.2020.100260 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00210.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.002 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41580-023-00583-110.1038/s41580-023-00583-1 ↗
4. 10.1039/C9BM01809C10.1039/C9BM01809C ↗
5. 10.1016/j.scib.2016.12.01210.1016/j.scib.2016.12.012 ↗
6. Andrades JA, Santamaria JA, Nimni ME, et al. Selection and amplification of a bone marrow cell population and its induction to the chondro-osteogenic lineage by rhOP-1: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Dev Biol 2001; 45: 689–693.
7. 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2020.06.00310.1016/bs.ircmb.2020.06.003 ↗
8. 10.1089/ten.teb.2015.056710.1089/ten.teb.2015.0567 ↗
9. 10.1111/nyas.1432610.1111/nyas.14326 ↗
10. 10.7150/ijms.2162010.7150/ijms.21620 ↗
11. 10.1002/bit.2761210.1002/bit.27612 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.10570010.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105700 ↗
13. Kühn PT, Zhou Q, van der Boon TA, et al. Double linear gradient biointerfaces for determining two‐parameter dependent stem cell behavior. Chem Nano Mat 2016; 2: 407–413.
14. 10.1073/pnas.161823911410.1073/pnas.1618239114 ↗
15. 10.1371/journal.pone.004610710.1371/journal.pone.0046107 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.017 ↗
17. 10.1002/adhm.20130026310.1002/adhm.201300263 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10544-015-9928-y10.1007/s10544-015-9928-y ↗
19. 10.1007/s10544-009-9329-110.1007/s10544-009-9329-1 ↗
20. 10.1039/C5LC00722D10.1039/C5LC00722D ↗
21. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.00110.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.001 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10439-019-02428-510.1007/s10439-019-02428-5 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.1195210.1002/app.11952 ↗
24. 10.3390/jfb1301000210.3390/jfb13010002 ↗
25. Scharin-Mehlmann M. Nano-and micro-patterned PDMS thin-films for biomedical devices. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 2020.
26. Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Mohammadi E, Torkashvand E. Mechanics of actin filaments in cancer onset and progress. International review of cell and molecular biology. Elsevier, 2020, pp. 205–243.
27. 10.1007/s40846-017-0341-210.1007/s40846-017-0341-2 ↗
28. 10.1142/S021951941750088910.1142/S0219519417500889 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.03710.1016/j.bpj.2018.03.037 ↗
31. 10.1038/nphys126910.1038/nphys1269 ↗
32. 10.1242/jcs.16170310.1242/jcs.161703 ↗
33. 10.1088/1758-5090/ad084910.1088/1758-5090/ad0849 ↗
34. 10.1002/jbm.a.3653310.1002/jbm.a.36533 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mex.2019.10.01810.1016/j.mex.2019.10.018 ↗
36. 10.1007/978-1-4614-9383-910.1007/978-1-4614-9383-9 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20120252010.1002/adma.201202520 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.04.00510.1016/j.yexcr.2006.04.005 ↗
39. 10.1002/adhm.20190144510.1002/adhm.201901445 ↗
40. 10.1111/cpr.1247810.1111/cpr.12478 ↗
41. 10.3390/cancers1105064310.3390/cancers11050643 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0032410.1021/acs.biomac.7b00324 ↗
43. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-342610.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3426 ↗