Scaffolds based on hyaluronan and carbon nanotubes gels
Source abstract
Abstract
Physico-chemical and mechanical properties of hyaluronic acid/carbon nanotubes nanohybrids have been correlated with the proportion of inorganic nanophase and the preparation procedure. The mass fraction of -COOH functionalized carbon nanotubes was varied from 0 to 0.05. Hyaluronic acid was crosslinked with divinyl sulfone to improve its stability in aqueous media and allow its handling as a hydrogel. A series of samples was dried by lyophilization to obtain porous scaffolds whereas another was room-dried allowing the collapse of the hybrid structures. The porosity of the former, together with the tighter packing of hyaluronic acid chains, results in a lower water absorption and lower mechanical properties in the swollen state, because of the easier water diffusion. The presence of even a small amount of carbon nanotubes (mass fraction of 0.05) limits even more the swelling of the matrix, owing probably to hybrid interactions. These nanohybrids do not seem to degrade significantly during 14 days in water or enzymatic medium.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain
Networking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Valencia, Spain
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-008044382-9/50038-810.1016/B978-008044382-9/50038-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.05210.1016/j.msec.2014.01.052 ↗
4. 10.1002/polb.2225910.1002/polb.22259 ↗
5. 10.1039/B910552M10.1039/B910552M ↗
6. 10.1016/j.patbio.2014.05.01910.1016/j.patbio.2014.05.019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.04.01610.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.04.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.03310.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.033 ↗
9. 10.1088/1748-6041/2/3/S1110.1088/1748-6041/2/3/S11 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01046.x10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01046.x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.06.06610.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.06.066 ↗
12. 10.4236/jeas.2011.1200410.4236/jeas.2011.12004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.03810.1016/j.msec.2013.09.038 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00204-012-0860-010.1007/s00204-012-0860-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.02310.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.023 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.017 ↗
17. 10.1088/0957-0233/18/12/00510.1088/0957-0233/18/12/005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.07910.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.079 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.12510.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.125 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.02510.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.025 ↗
21. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.51310.1089/ten.2005.11.513 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.03310.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.033 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.09510.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.095 ↗
24. 10.1515/ntrev-2012-006710.1515/ntrev-2012-0067 ↗
25. 10.6028/jres.081A.01110.6028/jres.081A.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.019 ↗
27. 10.1021/bm049508a10.1021/bm049508a ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matbio.2005.11.00510.1016/j.matbio.2005.11.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matbio.2008.01.00710.1016/j.matbio.2008.01.007 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.02510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.025 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55942-110.1016/S0021-9258(18)55942-1 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55817-810.1016/S0021-9258(18)55817-8 ↗
33. 10.1021/bm700997610.1021/bm7009976 ↗
34. 10.1021/bm401041z10.1021/bm401041z ↗
35. 10.1007/978-1-4419-5919-5_110.1007/978-1-4419-5919-5_1 ↗
36. Detournay E, Cheng AH-D. Fundamentals of poroelasticity. Comprehensive rock engineering: principles, practice and projects, Vol. II, Analysis and design method , New York: Pergamon Press, 1993, pp. 113–171.10.1016/B978-0-08-040615-2.50011-3 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10439-007-9351-510.1007/s10439-007-9351-5 ↗