journal article·2024-10-01Open access

Permeability and Porosity of Artificial-Similar Material for Biomimetic Geotechnical Engineering via Direct Ink Writing for Sustainability

Sanqiang Xu, Kepeng Yang, Wei Xiong, Zheng Li, Liang Hao

Abstract

Direct ink writing of multiple mineral materials (M 3 ) coupled with simulation analysis is an optimization solution in accordance with low-carbon and sustainable manufacturing. It improves the ability to imitate natural biological iterative optimization, and accurately obtained data for geological model tests to effectively help prevent natural disasters. This article investigates the effects of equivalent materials on the direct ink writing and permeability behaviors through geological simulation models. The mineral compositions provide adjustable cohesion and compression coefficient properties and considerably improve the stability and dispersion of slurry by adjusting parameters such as the viscosity, filling ratio, and deposition height. The upper limit of the permeability depends on the designed macropores and the printing accuracy because macro features provide pathways for rapid water infiltration into the printed specimen. This research establishes guidelines for the fabrication of components with tailored and designed-pore-dependent permeability properties that are primarily for slope geotechnical engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Building materials and conservation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Design Department, Gemmological Institute, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, P.R. China.

Industrial Design Department, School of Ceramic Art and Design Art, Jingdezhen University, Jingdezhen, P.R. China.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11771-018-3959-510.1007/s11771-018-3959-5 ↗
2. Chen S, , Wang H, , Zhang J, et al. Experimental study on low-strength similar-material proportioning and properties for coal mining. Adv Mater Sci Eng, 2015; 2015:1–6; doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/69650110.1155/2015/696501 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.05710.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.057 ↗
4. 10.1016/B978-012636375-3/50004-510.1016/B978-012636375-3/50004-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.clay.2016.11.01810.1016/j.clay.2016.11.018 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000104010.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001040 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0169-1317(03)00078-410.1016/S0169-1317(03)00078-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.00610.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11040710.1016/j.matdes.2022.110407 ↗
10. 10.3390/mi1308136610.3390/mi13081366 ↗
11. 10.3390/mi1402036210.3390/mi14020362 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.04210.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.042 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10064-010-0295-x10.1007/s10064-010-0295-x ↗
14. 10.1007/s10064-002-0174-110.1007/s10064-002-0174-1 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.23210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.232 ↗
16. 10.1617/s11527-015-0571-010.1617/s11527-015-0571-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10806910.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108069 ↗
18. Deng M, , Xu Q, , Zheng G, et al. Study on the formation mechanism of Jiweishan landslide in Wulong, Chongqing, China-based on centrifugal model test. Chin J Rock Mech Eng, 2016; 35:3024–3035; doi: https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.1582
19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.05510.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.055 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.007 ↗
21. Duncan JM, , Wright SG, , Brandon TL. Soil strength and slope stability. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey; 2014.
22. 10.1007/s10064-017-1007-610.1007/s10064-017-1007-6 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12404-010-0206-610.1007/s12404-010-0206-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.04610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.046 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.clay.2019.10528510.1016/j.clay.2019.105285 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12713110.1016/j.matlet.2019.127131 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.02210.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.03910.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.039 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.12410.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.124 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.00610.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.01610.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.016 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.02410.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.024 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10064-013-0552-x10.1007/s10064-013-0552-x ↗
34. 10.1007/s10064-014-0671-z10.1007/s10064-014-0671-z ↗
35. 10.1155/2019/592458010.1155/2019/5924580 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1000-9361(09)60246-610.1016/S1000-9361(09)60246-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.clay.2017.09.01410.1016/j.clay.2017.09.014 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.clay.2019.10536610.1016/j.clay.2019.105366 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.01410.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.02.00310.1016/j.advwatres.2015.02.003 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11878510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118785 ↗