journal article·2024-04

Comprehensive functional outcome analysis and importance of bone remodelling on personalized cranioplasty treatment using Poly(methyl methacrylate) bone flaps

Sandeep Iratwar, Sulob Roy Chowdhury, Shweta Pisulkar, Soumitra Das, Akhilesh Agarwal, Ashutosh Bagde, Balaji Paikrao, Syed Quazi, Bikramjit Basu

Publisher page

Abstract

Cranioplasty involves the surgical reconstruction of cranial defects arising as a result of various factors, including decompressive craniectomy, cranial malformations, and brain injury due to road traffic accidents. Most of the modern decompressive craniectomies (DC) warrant a future cranioplasty surgery within 6–36 months. The conventional process of capturing the defect impression and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) flap fabrication results in a misfit or misalignment at the site of implantation. Equally, the intra-operative graft preparation is arduous and can result in a longer surgical time, which may compromise the functional and aesthetic outcomes. As part of a multicentric pilot clinical study, we recently conducted a cohort study on ten human subjects during 2019–2022, following the human ethics committee approvals from the participating institutes. In the current study, an important aspect of measuring the extent of bone remodelling during the time gap between decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty was successfully evaluated. The sterilised PMMA bone flaps were implanted at the defect area during the cranioplasty surgery using titanium mini plates and screws. The mean surgery time was 90 ± 20 min, comparable to the other clinical studies on cranioplasty. No signs of intra-operative and post-operative complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage, hematoma, or local and systemic infection, were clinically recorded. Importantly, aesthetic outcomes were excellent for all the patients, except in a few clinical cases, wherein the PMMA bone flap was to be carefully customized due to the remodelling of the native skull bone. The extent of physiological remodelling was evaluated by superimposing the pre-operative and post-operative CT scan data after converting the defect morphology into a 3D model. This study further establishes the safety and efficacy of a technologically better approach to fabricate patient-specific acrylic bone flaps with improved surgical outcomes. More importantly, the study outcome further demonstrates the strategy to address bone remodelling during the patient-specific implant design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances · Traumatic Brain Injury Research · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Neurosurgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, India

Material Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, India

Bio-Innovation cell, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, India

Faculty of Engineering Technology, Biomedical Engineering/and Research Scientist, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, India

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India

Department of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Wardha, India

Funding

Bioengineering and Biodesign initiative at Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India: Phase 2 (BBI2), funded by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India · Abdul Kalam Technology Innovation National Fellowship, Government of India · SERB-CRG project Government of India

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.03010.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.030 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41598-017-08959-y10.1038/s41598-017-08959-y ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.02010.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.020 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1309145210.3390/polym13091452 ↗
5. 10.4103/2152-7806.11953510.4103/2152-7806.119535 ↗
6. 10.1186/s41984-018-0002-y10.1186/s41984-018-0002-y ↗
7. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.10597910.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105979 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.19310.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.193 ↗
9. 10.1097/SCS.000000000000302510.1097/SCS.0000000000003025 ↗
10. 10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS1356110.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00701-020-04243-710.1007/s00701-020-04243-7 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.b.3147310.1002/jbm.b.31473 ↗
13. 10.1097/SAP.000000000000180110.1097/SAP.0000000000001801 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10070710.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.0c0357210.1021/acsami.0c03572 ↗
16. 10.4103/sni.sni_149_1810.4103/sni.sni_149_18 ↗
17. 10.1111/jopr.1327410.1111/jopr.13274 ↗
18. 10.1089/neu.1998.15.57310.1089/neu.1998.15.573 ↗
19. 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.28510.1136/jnnp.44.4.285 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0736-4679(00)00182-710.1016/S0736-4679(00)00182-7 ↗
21. 10.1080/0269905090292626710.1080/02699050902926267 ↗
22. 10.3171/ped.2004.100.5.053710.3171/ped.2004.100.5.0537 ↗
23. 10.1371/journal.pone.007426710.1371/journal.pone.0074267 ↗
24. 10.1179/1743132812Y.000000000710.1179/1743132812Y.0000000007 ↗
25. 10.3389/fneur.2019.0135710.3389/fneur.2019.01357 ↗
26. 10.3171/2016.10.JNS1667810.3171/2016.10.JNS16678 ↗
27. 10.1093/neuros/nyx05410.1093/neuros/nyx054 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.02210.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.022 ↗
29. Malcolm JG · J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas · 2016 · 33 · 39
30. 10.3171/2017.8.JNS17185710.3171/2017.8.JNS171857 ↗
31. Morselli C · J Neurosurg Sci · 2019 · 63 · 723
32. Haley M · Plast Surg Oakv Ont · 2021 · 29 · 184
33. 10.4103/0976-3147.8358410.4103/0976-3147.83584 ↗
34. 10.3390/ma1203040710.3390/ma12030407 ↗
35. 10.1080/02688697.2020.174229110.1080/02688697.2020.1742291 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.10.00210.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.10.002 ↗
37. 10.1111/ocr.1228110.1111/ocr.12281 ↗
38. 10.1111/joa.1224710.1111/joa.12247 ↗
39. 10.3171/2015.10.JNS15124510.3171/2015.10.JNS151245 ↗