Response of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to graphene-containing grid-like bioactive glass scaffolds produced by robocasting
Source abstract
Abstract
In the study, three-dimensional, grid-like silicate-based bioactive glass scaffolds were manufactured using a robotic deposition technique. Inks were prepared by mixing 13-93 bioactive glass particles in Pluronic® F-127 solution. After deposition, scaffolds were dried at room temperature and sintered at 690°C for 1 h. The surface of the sintered scaffolds was coated with graphene nanopowder (1, 3, 5, 10 wt%) containing poly(ε-caprolactone) solution. The in vitro mineralization ability of the prepared composite scaffolds was investigated in simulated body fluid. The surface of the simulated body fluid-treated scaffolds was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy to investigate the hydroxyapatite formation. Mechanical properties were tested under compression. Results revealed that graphene coating has no detrimental effect on the hydroxyapatite forming ability of the prepared glass scaffolds. On the other hand, it decreased the compression strength of the scaffolds at high graphene concentrations. The prepared grid-like bioactive glass-based composite scaffolds did not show toxic response to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. It was shown that stem cells seeded onto the scaffolds attached and proliferated well on the surface. Cells seeded on the scaffolds surface also demonstrated osteogenic differentiation under in vitro conditions in the absence of transforming growth factors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Manisa Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Yunusemre, Manisa, Turkey
Manisa Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Science and Literature, Department of Biology, Yunusemre, Manisa, Turkey
Funding
Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/macp.20120002910.1002/macp.201200029 ↗
2. 10.1021/ar300159f10.1021/ar300159f ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20120370010.1002/adma.201203700 ↗
4. 10.1021/tx200339h10.1021/tx200339h ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.05410.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.054 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.04010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.040 ↗
7. Wang X · Int J Nanomed · 2013 · 8 · 1733
8. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
9. 10.3390/ma307386710.3390/ma3073867 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
12. 10.4161/org.604810.4161/org.6048 ↗
13. Dubey N · Stem Cells Int · 2015 · 2015 · 1210.1155/2015/804213 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn200500h10.1021/nn200500h ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.01010.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.010 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3nr00803g10.1039/c3nr00803g ↗
17. 10.1021/nn101827910.1021/nn1018279 ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.a.3499310.1002/jbm.a.34993 ↗
19. 10.22203/eCM.v035a0510.22203/eCM.v035a05 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10856-016-5732-310.1007/s10856-016-5732-3 ↗
22. Mo X · J Nanomater · 2016 · 5613980 · 11
23. 10.1080/10667857.2018.151799410.1080/10667857.2018.1517994 ↗
24. Deliormanlı AM, Atmaca H. Biological response of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 and chondrogenic ATDC5 cells to PCL/bioactive glass binary scaffolds for ostechondral tissue engineering applications. J Appl Biochem Biotechnol . 2018. In press. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-018-2758-7.10.1007/s12010-018-2758-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.02610.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.026 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.03110.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.031 ↗
27. 10.1080/03602559.2014.90946010.1080/03602559.2014.909460 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.02910.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.029 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.11.00110.1016/j.procir.2015.11.001 ↗
30. Chen Y · J Appl Polym Sci · 2014 · 131 · 4000610.1002/app.40006 ↗
31. 10.1002/jbm.82024060710.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
33. Li G · Sci Rep · 2016 · 6 · Article
34. 10.3390/ma1009108310.3390/ma10091083 ↗
35. 10.1002/jbm.a.3282410.1002/jbm.a.32824 ↗
36. 10.2147/IJN.S9211010.2147/IJN.S92110 ↗
37. 10.1042/BJ2006184010.1042/BJ20061840 ↗
38. Wu X · J Mater Chem B · 2017
39. 10.1177/204173141664978910.1177/2041731416649789 ↗
40. Wu X · Sci · 2018 · 6 · 1147
41. 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.10.00510.1016/j.exphem.2015.10.005 ↗
42. 10.1002/jbm.a.3456110.1002/jbm.a.34561 ↗
43. 10.1088/1748-6041/10/6/06501110.1088/1748-6041/10/6/065011 ↗
44. 10.1002/jbm.a.3613110.1002/jbm.a.36131 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.08.00910.1016/j.addr.2016.08.009 ↗
46. 10.1021/nl304647t10.1021/nl304647t ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0044710.1021/acs.accounts.6b00447 ↗
48. 10.1007/s13770-013-0384-610.1007/s13770-013-0384-6 ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20120084610.1002/adma.201200846 ↗
50. Bouzid T · Neural Regen Res · 2016 · 11 · 89410.4103/1673-5374.184454 ↗
51. 10.1155/2018/341016810.1155/2018/3410168 ↗