journal article·2025-04Open access

Impact of composition and surfactant-templating on mesoporous bioactive glasses structural evolution, bioactivity, and drug delivery property

Dana Almasri, Yaser Dahman

Abstract

This study explores mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) that show promise as advanced therapeutic delivery platforms owing to their tailorable porous properties enabling enhanced drug loading capacity and biomimetic chemistry for localized, sustained release. This work systematically investigates the complex relationship between MBG composition and surfactant templating on structural evolution, in vitro bioactive response, resultant drug loading efficiency and release. A total of 12 samples of sol-gel-derived MBG were synthesized using cationic and non-ionic structure-directing agents (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, Pluronic F127 and P123) while modulating the SiO 2 /CaO content, generating MBG with surface areas of 60–695 m 2 /g. Electron microscopy and nitrogen desorption studies verified the successful synthesis of the 12 ordered MBG formulations. Assessment of hydroxyapatite conversion kinetics via FTIR spectroscopy and SEM demonstrated accelerated deposition for 70–80% SiO 2 formulations, independent of the surfactant used. However, the templating agent had an impact on drug loading as observed in this study where MBG synthesized by the templating agent Pluronic P123 had higher drug loading compared to the other surfactants. To determine the drug release mechanisms, the in vitro kinetic profiles were fitted to various mathematical models including ze-ro. Most compositions exhibited release properties closest to zero-order, indicating a concentration-independent drug elution rate. These results in this study explain the relationship between tailored hierarchical architecture and intrinsic ion release rates to enable advanced functionality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Department of Chemical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.293.3710.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.293.37 ↗
2. 10.1201/b13926-210.1201/b13926-2 ↗
3. 10.1002/jbm.1027310.1002/jbm.10273 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.a.1050110.1002/jbm.a.10501 ↗
5. 10.3390/molecules2611317710.3390/molecules26113177 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1105069210.3390/ma11050692 ↗
7. 10.1002/jab.77002040310.1002/jab.770020403 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cis.2017.03.00810.1016/j.cis.2017.03.008 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1418544010.3390/ma14185440 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.02810.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.028 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma901005810.3390/ma9010058 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20046059810.1002/anie.200460598 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.02410.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.024 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.00710.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.00410.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.004 ↗
16. 10.3390/biomimetics601000910.3390/biomimetics6010009 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma512287410.3390/ma5122874 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.04310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.043 ↗
19. 10.3390/nano1012257110.3390/nano10122571 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.11.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2005.11.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.03.03510.1016/j.micromeso.2014.03.035 ↗
23. 10.1179/1433075x11y.000000004410.1179/1433075x11y.0000000044 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12242310.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122423 ↗
25. 10.4103/2229-4708.9036410.4103/2229-4708.90364 ↗
26. 10.5772/intechopen.9529010.5772/intechopen.95290 ↗
27. Bruschi ML. Strategies to modify the drug release from pharmaceutical systems. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier/Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 63–84.
28. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.02.01710.1016/j.ejpb.2015.02.017 ↗
29. Dash S · Acta Pol Pharm · 2010 · 67 · 217
30. 10.1093/jac/dki12410.1093/jac/dki124 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10853-019-04206-z10.1007/s10853-019-04206-z ↗
32. Ramaswamy V · 2016
33. 10.3390/cryst1006052910.3390/cryst10060529 ↗
34. 10.1515/bglass-2015-001410.1515/bglass-2015-0014 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12163010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121630 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20050229210.1002/adma.200502292 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.09.01410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.09.014 ↗
38. 10.1039/c5ra13410b10.1039/c5ra13410b ↗
39. 10.1002/jbm.a.110.1002/jbm.a.1 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.03310.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.033 ↗
41. 10.1039/b414143a10.1039/b414143a ↗
42. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/49/49401410.1088/0957-4484/22/49/494014 ↗
43. 10.1080/0371750x.2018.146535710.1080/0371750x.2018.1465357 ↗
44. 10.1021/cm060488o10.1021/cm060488o ↗
45. 10.5772/intechopen.9529010.5772/intechopen.95290 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
47. 10.2478/s11532-014-0501-y10.2478/s11532-014-0501-y ↗
48. 10.1002/smtd.20180017310.1002/smtd.201800173 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.04110.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.041 ↗
50. 10.3390/nano1111315210.3390/nano11113152 ↗
51. 10.22146/ijc.3504810.22146/ijc.35048 ↗
52. 10.1088/1748-605x/aa645d10.1088/1748-605x/aa645d ↗
53. 10.1371/journal.pone.015072710.1371/journal.pone.0150727 ↗