Preliminary evaluation of therapeutic ion release from Sr-doped zinc-silicate glass ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Bioactive and degradable porous bioceramics play an important role in many clinical situations. Porosity is essential to the performance of a material that is proposed to be used as an implantable osseous scaffold. Scaffolds provide a three dimensional support and template to osseous integration and vascularization. Combining the porosity of a scaffold with the ability of the scaffold material to deliver therapeutic ions to the site of implantation goes some way towards developing an ideal bone graft. A series of strontium-doped zinc silicate (Ca-Sr-Na-Zn-Si) glass ceramics scaffoldswere developed, whose porosity was measured to be between 93% and 96%, which is advantageous in terms of osseous integration and vascularization. The levels of Zn 2+ and Sr 2+ detected as a result of degradation of the crystalline phases were found to be 1.4–600 parts per million (ppm) and 0–583 ppm, respectively. The levels detected correlate well with the levels of Sr 2+ and Zn 2+ ions typically associated with clinical benefits, including antibacterial efficacy, osteoblastic differentiation and impaired osteoclastic resorption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cork Institute of Technology, Ireland
Department of Applied Oral Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, B3H 1W2
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1054/mehy.2000.109510.1054/mehy.2000.1095 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.07.01210.1016/j.actbio.2006.07.012 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.00810.1016/j.injury.2007.02.008 ↗
4. 10.1097/00007632-199505000-0001210.1097/00007632-199505000-00012 ↗
5. 10.1302/0301-620X.83B1.1195210.1302/0301-620X.83B1.11952 ↗
6. 10.1056/NEJM19920312326110210.1056/NEJM199203123261102 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10856-009-3789-y10.1007/s10856-009-3789-y ↗
8. Jarcho M · J Bioeng · 1977 · 1 · 79
9. 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90309-A10.1016/0278-2391(91)90309-A ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0255582010.1007/BF02555820 ↗
11. Kokubo TSM · Bull Inst Chem Res Kyoto Univ · 1982 · 60 · 260
12. 10.1002/jbm.a.3012810.1002/jbm.a.30128 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.03510.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.035 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0894-1130(03)80013-310.1016/S0894-1130(03)80013-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.08310.1016/j.cej.2007.07.083 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.025 ↗
17. Baino F · Mat Sci Eng C · 2011
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.044 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.02.01710.1016/j.injury.2010.02.017 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.01.00810.1016/j.matlet.2004.01.008 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02020.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02020.x ↗
22. 10.1007/s00223000113410.1007/s002230001134 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00330-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00330-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.01010.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.08.00110.1016/j.bioeng.2007.08.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.011 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.14310.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.143 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biopha.2008.07.05110.1016/j.biopha.2008.07.051 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10856-006-8930-610.1007/s10856-006-8930-6 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10856-008-3569-010.1007/s10856-008-3569-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.07.01410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.07.014 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10856-006-0060-710.1007/s10856-006-0060-7 ↗
33. 10.1002/jbm.a.3121410.1002/jbm.a.31214 ↗
34. 10.1007/BF0278390510.1007/BF02783905 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00108-X10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00108-X ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.00510.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.005 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.12010.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.120 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.04310.1016/j.bone.2007.08.043 ↗
39. 10.1248/jhs.50.7510.1248/jhs.50.75 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.11.11810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.11.118 ↗
41. Biological evaluation of medical devices. In Identification and quantification of degradation products from ceramics . Geneva: International Organization of Standardization, 1997, Part 14.
42. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.02910.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.029 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.00910.1016/j.actbio.2006.09.009 ↗
44. 10.1016/0955-2219(94)90134-110.1016/0955-2219(94)90134-1 ↗
45. Clark DE · 1992
46. 10.1016/0191-815X(80)90029-710.1016/0191-815X(80)90029-7 ↗
47. Zreiqat H, Yogambha Ramaswamy, Chengtie Wu, Angelo Paschalidis, ZuFu Lu, Barbara James, et al. The incorporation of strontium and zinc into a calcium-silicon ceramic for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials , in press.
48. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.08.01310.1016/j.actbio.2007.08.013 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.01410.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.014 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.msec.2005.11.00410.1016/j.msec.2005.11.004 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.01510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.015 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.03810.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.038 ↗
53. 10.1007/s00198-002-1349-010.1007/s00198-002-1349-0 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.bone.2004.04.02610.1016/j.bone.2004.04.026 ↗