Biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of strontium and silver ion-releasing titanium with high silver treatment concentration
Source abstract
Abstract
To overcome problems associated with surgical site infection and implant loosening, we developed a titanium (Ti)-based material employing a modified alkaline heat treatment that releases strontium (Sr) and silver (Ag) ions (CaSrAg-Ti). In this study, to determine the optimal Ag treatment concentration, we prepared four different materials—commercially pure Ti (cp-Ti) as a negative control, CaSr1mMAg-Ti, CaSr10mMAg-Ti, and CaSr50mMAg-Ti. Ion release test was performed by immersing the prepared disks in fetal bovine serum. With increased loading of Ag ions, the amount of released ions increased. Colony-forming unit count assay was performed using methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli . High antibacterial activity was observed in CaSr10mMAg-Ti and CaSr50mMAg-Ti groups. In vivo experiments were performed using the rat subcutaneous pocket infection model and evaluated by counting the attached bacteria, wound appearance, and histological evaluation. High antibacterial activity value (AAV >2) and anti-inflammatory effects were observed in the CaSr50mMAg-Ti group. However, CaSr10mMAg-Ti did not exhibit consistent antibacterial activity. For in vivo biocompatibility and bone-bonding ability evaluation, rods were implanted into the rat femur. No cytotoxicity was observed at 1 week, and good bone-bonding ability at 4 and 8 weeks was not significantly different from that of CaSr1mMAg-Ti. To evaluate in vivo bioactivity and cytotoxicity, MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured on disks. CaSr10mMAg-Ti and CaSr50mMAg-Ti significantly inhibited the proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3E1 cells, as well as the production of extracellular matrix in vivo , despite showing good biocompatibility in vivo . In conclusion, CaSr50mMAg-Ti, with increased Ag ion loading, exhibited high antibacterial activity in vivo while maintaining the bone-bonding ability and is a promising therapeutic biomaterial. Further research is needed to determine the optimal combination of therapeutic concentrations of Sr and Ag.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life and Health Sciences, Chubu University, Kasugai, Japan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.01310.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.013 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10266-023-00832-x10.1007/s10266-023-00832-x ↗
3. 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.66710.5312/wjo.v5.i5.667 ↗
4. 10.1056/NEJMoa130680110.1056/NEJMoa1306801 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11999-016-4857-510.1007/s11999-016-4857-5 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08561.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08561.x ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.b.3130910.1002/jbm.b.31309 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00586-011-1728-310.1007/s00586-011-1728-3 ↗
9. 10.1302/0301-620x.104b2.Bjj-2021-1079.R110.1302/0301-620x.104b2.Bjj-2021-1079.R1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.014 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10856-013-4919-010.1007/s10856-013-4919-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.00710.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.007 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.02610.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.026 ↗
14. 10.1039/C3RA00054K10.1039/C3RA00054K ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.02610.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.026 ↗
16. 10.3390/nano708022910.3390/nano7080229 ↗
17. 10.3390/nano1109219910.3390/nano11092199 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10856-014-5201-910.1007/s10856-014-5201-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.metabol.2003.10.02210.1016/j.metabol.2003.10.022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.04310.1016/j.bone.2007.08.043 ↗
21. 10.1128/aem.02001-0710.1128/aem.02001-07 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.01910.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.019 ↗
23. 10.3390/coatings909056110.3390/coatings9090561 ↗
24. 10.1177/088532822095958410.1177/0885328220959584 ↗
25. 10.1002/jbm.b.3469510.1002/jbm.b.34695 ↗
26. 10.3390/ijms2107237510.3390/ijms21072375 ↗
27. 10.1302/0301-620x.93b5.2551810.1302/0301-620x.93b5.25518 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.21295210.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212952 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-020-68184-y10.1038/s41598-020-68184-y ↗
30. 10.1902/jop.1998.69.4.48510.1902/jop.1998.69.4.485 ↗
31. 10.1002/ar.2139110.1002/ar.21391 ↗
32. 10.3390/molecules3003062610.3390/molecules30030626 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11051-010-9900-y10.1007/s11051-010-9900-y ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.00210.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20120592310.1002/anie.201205923 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.05110.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.051 ↗
37. 10.1039/d3tb02146g10.1039/d3tb02146g ↗
38. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1962.tb00834.x10.1002/j.1551-8833.1962.tb00834.x ↗
39. 10.1155/2014/90234310.1155/2014/902343 ↗
40. 10.1002/jbm.a.3167910.1002/jbm.a.31679 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.01110.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.011 ↗
42. 10.1007/s12551-019-00596-110.1007/s12551-019-00596-1 ↗
43. 10.1302/0301-620x.103b3.Bjj-2020-1370.R110.1302/0301-620x.103b3.Bjj-2020-1370.R1 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.03410.1016/j.arth.2015.12.034 ↗
45. 10.1002/jbm.b.3152610.1002/jbm.b.31526 ↗
46. 10.1002/jor.2235710.1002/jor.22357 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11051910.1016/j.msec.2019.110519 ↗
48. 10.1002/jbm.b.3539310.1002/jbm.b.35393 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.21378110.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213781 ↗
50. 10.2147/ijn.S26430310.2147/ijn.S264303 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.15410.1016/j.msec.2017.02.154 ↗
52. 10.1186/s12866-024-03682-x10.1186/s12866-024-03682-x ↗
53. 10.3390/ijms2315805810.3390/ijms23158058 ↗