From leaf to cellulose scaffold: Decellularization and multi-scale characterization of Neolamarckia cadamba leaf for biomedical applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Exploring biological “orthogonality” between plant and animal kingdoms provides a unique opportunity to mimic biological features of both kingdoms. This novel approach can provide solutions to problems that animal kingdom faces. In this study, we aimed to develop and characterize the Neolamarckia cadamba leaf-derived cellulose scaffolds (NCCS). Fresh Neolamarckia cadamba leaves were decutinized using an n-hexanes-diethyl ether and decellularized using 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for 120h and 2% sodium deoxycholate (SDC) solution for 48h. The leaves incubated in deionized water were acted as controls. Finally, the leaves were bleached in 4% NaOCl solution for 12 h. Histology, DAPI staining, and SEM study of scaffold showed complete decellularization with significantly reduced DNA quantity. Water vapor transmission rate and swelling percentage increased significantly and the scaffolds were hemocompatible. Contact angle revealed a significant increase in hydrophilicity and at maximum load of 2.83 N, percent elongation at break was 0.094 mm/mm. The FT-IR bands were not disturbed, and average roughness (Ra) and root mean square roughness (RMS) (Rq) of NCCS was 193.27 nm and 153.48 nm, respectively. Specific surface area, pore volume, and pore radius of NCCS were increased. The Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were adhered on NCCS and cell viability on decellularized leaf was 88.18% ± 16.12%. Subcutaneously implanted NCCS revealed infiltrated host cells. These characteristics establish NCCS as a sustainable, ethical and cost-effective substitute to mammalian tissue-derived scaffolds for biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology
IVRI
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Gangwar AK, Kumar V, Devarathnum J, et al. Acellular aortic matrix for the repair of large ventral hernia in a buck. Vet Pract 2012; 13: 293–294.
2. 10.1016/j.tice.2015.04.00210.1016/j.tice.2015.04.002 ↗
3. Kumar V, Gangwar AK, Kumar N, et al. Use of the bubaline acellular diaphragm matrix for umbilical hernioplasty in pigs. Vet Arh 2015; 85: 49–58.
4. 10.1177/0885328225132955910.1177/08853282251329559 ↗
5. 10.2217/17460751.3.1.110.2217/17460751.3.1.1 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10047-013-0734-010.1007/s10047-013-0734-0 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.4171910.1002/app.41719 ↗
8. 10.1038/nature0144410.1038/nature01444 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057 ↗
10. Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, et al. The dynamic plant cell wall. Molecular Cell Biology. 4th ed. : W. H. Freeman, 2000.
11. 10.1371/journal.pone.015789410.1371/journal.pone.0157894 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.82023011010.1002/jbm.820230110 ↗
13. 10.1039/C5TB01640A10.1039/C5TB01640A ↗
14. 10.4102/jsava.v77i2.34910.4102/jsava.v77i2.349 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.10584610.1063/1.105846 ↗
16. 10.1002/0471143030.cb0422s4310.1002/0471143030.cb0422s43 ↗
17. Ahangar Salehani A, Rabbani M, Biazar E, et al. The effectof chemical detergents on the decellularization process of olive leaves for tissue engineering applications. Eng Rep 2023; 5(2): e12560. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12560
18. 10.1007/s11671-009-9278-x10.1007/s11671-009-9278-x ↗
19. 10.1002/pat.579210.1002/pat.5792 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10570-020-03278-410.1007/s10570-020-03278-4 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
22. 10.1002/jcp.3023910.1002/jcp.30239 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10561-021-09916-w10.1007/s10561-021-09916-w ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.011 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.10098610.1016/j.fbio.2021.100986 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11627-020-10077-w10.1007/s11627-020-10077-w ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.b.3354710.1002/jbm.b.33547 ↗
28. 10.3390/ijms2606275210.3390/ijms26062752 ↗
29. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.71226210.3389/fbioe.2021.712262 ↗
30. Thippan M, Dhoolappa M, Lakshmishree KT, et al. Morphology of medicinal plant leaves for functional vascularity: a novel approach for tissue engineering applications. Int J Chem Stud 2019; 7(3): 55–58.
31. 10.1002/adhm.20160122510.1002/adhm.201601225 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.005 ↗
33. 10.3390/gels901005510.3390/gels9010055 ↗
34. 10.1016/0142-9612(95)92114-L10.1016/0142-9612(95)92114-L ↗
35. Totea G, Ionita D, Demetrescu I, et al. In vitro hemocompatibility and corrosion behavior of new Zr-binary alloys in whole human blood. Cent Eur J Chem 2014; 12: 796–803. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-014-0535-1
36. Liu Y, Cai D, Yang J, et al. In vitro hemocompatibility evaluation of poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) scaffold. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014; 7(5): 1233–1239.
37. 10.1007/s00289-024-05185-110.1007/s00289-024-05185-1 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0174510.1021/acs.biomac.7b01745 ↗
39. 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181da863e10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181da863e ↗
40. Aswathy SH, Mohan CC, Unnikrishnan PS, et al. Decellularization and oxidation process of bamboo stem enhance biodegradation and osteogenic differentiation. Mater Sci Eng C 2020; 111: 111500.
41. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.74922110.3389/fbioe.2021.749221 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.06910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.069 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.050 ↗
44. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0093210.3389/fbioe.2020.00932 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.gene.2020.14485210.1016/j.gene.2020.144852 ↗
46. 10.1002/app.3058410.1002/app.30584 ↗
47. Ciolacu D, Ciolacu F, Popa VI. Amorphous cellulose structure and characterization. Cellul Chem Technol 2011; 45: 13–21.
48. 10.3390/ijms2005120010.3390/ijms20051200 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0100710.1021/acsapm.9b01007 ↗
50. 10.1117/12.5819110.1117/12.58191 ↗
51. 10.3389/fbioe.2025.152495610.3389/fbioe.2025.1524956 ↗
52. 10.1002/jbm.a.3724110.1002/jbm.a.37241 ↗
53. 10.3389/fbioe.2024.144498610.3389/fbioe.2024.1444986 ↗
54. 10.1371/journal.pone.009783510.1371/journal.pone.0097835 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10853-023-09064-410.1007/s10853-023-09064-4 ↗
56. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.74228510.3389/fbioe.2021.742285 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.09.01610.1016/j.actbio.2023.09.016 ↗
58. 10.3390/jfb1610038010.3390/jfb16100380 ↗
59. 10.1002/jbm.a.3057010.1002/jbm.a.30570 ↗
60. Adamski M, Fontana G, Gershlak J, et al. Two methods for decellularization of plant tissues for tissue engineering applications. J Vis Exp 2018; 135: e57586. https://doi.org/10.3791/57586
61. 10.1038/nmat244110.1038/nmat2441 ↗
62. 10.1089/ten.tea.2015.017310.1089/ten.tea.2015.0173 ↗