Calcium phosphate graphene with tailorable phosphate and oxygen content for increased osteogenic activity
Source abstract
Abstract
The treatment of critical bone injuries using autografts and metallic hardware, though effective, carries drawbacks yet to be addressed by modern interventions. One way that researchers have sought to avoid these complications is using bioresorbable synthetic grafts. Ideally, these materials possess mechanical properties like that of bone and support the site of injury until absorbed and replaced by native bone. In this work we seek to continue the work of optimizing the synthesis of one synthetic graft candidate, calcium phosphate graphene (CaPG). CaPG is a functional graphenic material (FGM) made using the Arbuzov reaction to covalently seed polyphosphates on the graphenic backbone. This material releases calcium and phosphate ions and has been shown to induce osteogenesis. Herein, we investigate reaction conditions and demonstrate the ability to tailor the functionalization of CaPG. The differences in these properties were found to affect mechanical properties, ion elution, as well as calcium deposition of stem cells when measured via Alizarin Red S (ARS). These results continue to demonstrate the potential of CaPG scaffolds as tunable materials to promote bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone health and treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Funding
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/iwj.1223110.1111/iwj.12231 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.04310.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.043 ↗
3. 10.1186/s12951-021-01173-z10.1186/s12951-021-01173-z ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.05.00610.1016/j.addr.2012.05.006 ↗
5. 10.1186/1749-799X-3-410.1186/1749-799X-3-4 ↗
6. 10.3727/096368912X63893710.3727/096368912X638937 ↗
7. Wang H · Bioact Mater · 2023 · 21 · 324
8. 10.1302/2058-5241.3.17005610.1302/2058-5241.3.170056 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40520-013-0088-810.1007/s40520-013-0088-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.034 ↗
11. 10.1097/BOT.000000000000142010.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 ↗
12. Anitua E · Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant · 2007 · 22 · 138
13. Albert A · Acta Orthop Belgica · 72 · 734
14. 10.1002/jor.110007041610.1002/jor.1100070416 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
16. 10.3390/jfb804004410.3390/jfb8040044 ↗
17. 10.2106/00004623-200103000-0001710.2106/00004623-200103000-00017 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00943.x10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00943.x ↗
19. 10.1302/0301-620X.76B5.808325710.1302/0301-620X.76B5.8083257 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msec.2004.08.01810.1016/j.msec.2004.08.018 ↗
21. 10.1016/0020-1383(96)89027-910.1016/0020-1383(96)89027-9 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.4509210.1002/app.45092 ↗
23. 10.1039/C9RA10646D10.1039/C9RA10646D ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12418010.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124180 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1210238810.3390/polym12102388 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12876910.1016/j.matlet.2020.128769 ↗
27. 10.3390/nano912175810.3390/nano9121758 ↗
28. 10.1073/pnas.181543411610.1073/pnas.1815434116 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.impact.2023.10047110.1016/j.impact.2023.100471 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.01.06210.1016/j.bios.2017.01.062 ↗
31. 10.1007/s40883-018-0081-z10.1007/s40883-018-0081-z ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20130347710.1002/adma.201303477 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.00510.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.005 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12015-012-9417-010.1007/s12015-012-9417-0 ↗