journal article·2024-11

Calcium phosphate graphene with tailorable phosphate and oxygen content for increased osteogenic activity

Jason D Orlando, Chenyun Deng, Anne M Arnold, Jing-yi Zhou, Walker Vickery, Stefanie Sydlik

Publisher page

Abstract

The treatment of critical bone injuries using autografts and metallic hardware, though effective, carries drawbacks yet to be addressed by modern interventions. One way that researchers have sought to avoid these complications is using bioresorbable synthetic grafts. Ideally, these materials possess mechanical properties like that of bone and support the site of injury until absorbed and replaced by native bone. In this work we seek to continue the work of optimizing the synthesis of one synthetic graft candidate, calcium phosphate graphene (CaPG). CaPG is a functional graphenic material (FGM) made using the Arbuzov reaction to covalently seed polyphosphates on the graphenic backbone. This material releases calcium and phosphate ions and has been shown to induce osteogenesis. Herein, we investigate reaction conditions and demonstrate the ability to tailor the functionalization of CaPG. The differences in these properties were found to affect mechanical properties, ion elution, as well as calcium deposition of stem cells when measured via Alizarin Red S (ARS). These results continue to demonstrate the potential of CaPG scaffolds as tunable materials to promote bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone health and treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Funding

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/iwj.1223110.1111/iwj.12231 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.04310.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.043 ↗
3. 10.1186/s12951-021-01173-z10.1186/s12951-021-01173-z ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.05.00610.1016/j.addr.2012.05.006 ↗
5. 10.1186/1749-799X-3-410.1186/1749-799X-3-4 ↗
6. 10.3727/096368912X63893710.3727/096368912X638937 ↗
7. Wang H · Bioact Mater · 2023 · 21 · 324
8. 10.1302/2058-5241.3.17005610.1302/2058-5241.3.170056 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40520-013-0088-810.1007/s40520-013-0088-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.034 ↗
11. 10.1097/BOT.000000000000142010.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 ↗
12. Anitua E · Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant · 2007 · 22 · 138
13. Albert A · Acta Orthop Belgica · 72 · 734
14. 10.1002/jor.110007041610.1002/jor.1100070416 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
16. 10.3390/jfb804004410.3390/jfb8040044 ↗
17. 10.2106/00004623-200103000-0001710.2106/00004623-200103000-00017 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00943.x10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00943.x ↗
19. 10.1302/0301-620X.76B5.808325710.1302/0301-620X.76B5.8083257 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msec.2004.08.01810.1016/j.msec.2004.08.018 ↗
21. 10.1016/0020-1383(96)89027-910.1016/0020-1383(96)89027-9 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.4509210.1002/app.45092 ↗
23. 10.1039/C9RA10646D10.1039/C9RA10646D ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12418010.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124180 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1210238810.3390/polym12102388 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12876910.1016/j.matlet.2020.128769 ↗
27. 10.3390/nano912175810.3390/nano9121758 ↗
28. 10.1073/pnas.181543411610.1073/pnas.1815434116 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.impact.2023.10047110.1016/j.impact.2023.100471 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.01.06210.1016/j.bios.2017.01.062 ↗
31. 10.1007/s40883-018-0081-z10.1007/s40883-018-0081-z ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20130347710.1002/adma.201303477 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.00510.1016/j.carbon.2019.08.005 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12015-012-9417-010.1007/s12015-012-9417-0 ↗