journal article·2026-04-21

Surface Characteristics of Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel with Plasma Electrolytic Polishing

Xiaoming Duan, Yi Xu, Tao Zhang, Huiqing He, Xiaodong Xing, Xiaodong Yang

Publisher page

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing faces challenges in directly fabricating end-use components due to the poor surface quality. Plasma electrolytic polishing (PEP) is an efficient and environmentally friendly surface treatment technology, demonstrating significant potential to enhance the surface quality of additively manufactured metal components. In this study, the surface characteristics of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel polished by PEP, including surface morphology, chemical composition, and wettability, are systematically investigated. First, the influence of key processing parameters, such as polishing time, voltage, electrolyte temperature, and concentration, on surface roughness was comprehensively examined through a series of experiments. The surface roughness was significantly reduced from 10.479 μm to 2.195 μm by using an optimized parameter combination: a polishing voltage of 300 V, an electrolyte concentration of 3%, an electrolyte temperature of 75°C, and a polishing time of 30 min. Then, surface characteristics of specimens treated with optimized PEP process parameters were studied and compared with those of as-fabricated specimens. Results showed that defects on the surface of as-fabricated specimens, such as adhered powders and oxides, were effectively removed by PEP. In addition, PEP can significantly improve the wettability of the specimens, with the contact angle decreasing from 80.9° to 39.4°. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of PEP of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel, indicating its potential for post-processing applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China.

Funding

Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.24010.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.240 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.10910.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.109 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170-022-09382-y10.1007/s00170-022-09382-y ↗
5. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.07.03010.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.07.030 ↗
6. 6.Beaucamp AT, , Namba Y, , Charlton P, et al. Finishing of electron beam melted titanium (Ti6Al4 V) using shape adaptive grinding tools. ASPE Spring Meeting-Additive Manufacturing, Berkeley, California, USA, 2014; doi:10.13140/2.1.4937.7287
7. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.03.00710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.03.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.08110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.081 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.00110.1016/j.addma.2018.11.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10368910.1016/j.addma.2023.103689 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14288810.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142888 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10982210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109822 ↗
13. 10.2351/1.490638510.2351/1.4906385 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.01.01310.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.01.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10161910.1016/j.addma.2020.101619 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10302810.1016/j.addma.2022.103028 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.24010.1016/j.procir.2016.02.240 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.28710.1016/j.procir.2020.02.287 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-021-07012-710.1007/s00170-021-07012-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.08.06610.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.08.066 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.02310.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.023 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2020.10001610.1016/j.apsadv.2020.100016 ↗
23. 23.Sabotin I, , Jerman M, , Lebar A, et al. Effects of plasma electrolytic polishing on SLM printed microfluidic platform. AdvTech&Mat 2022;47(1):19–23; doi: 10.24867/atm-2022-1-004
24. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.01610.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.016 ↗
25. 10.1108/1355254131131216610.1108/13552541311312166 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.19810.1016/j.procir.2024.08.198 ↗
27. 10.3103/S1068798X1806003510.3103/S1068798X18060035 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10436210.1016/j.addma.2024.104362 ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.217-219.136810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.217-219.1368 ↗
30. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad590c10.1149/1945-7111/ad590c ↗
31. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.12513610.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125136 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00170-018-2283-410.1007/s00170-018-2283-4 ↗