journal article·2017-07

Fabricating high mechanical strength γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles filled poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofiber using electrospinning process potentially for tissue engineering scaffold

Nor Hasrul Akhmal Ngadiman, Noordin Mohd Yusof, Ani Idris, Denni Kurniawan, Ehsan Fallahiarezoudar

Publisher page

Abstract

The use of electrospinning has gained substantial interest in the development of tissue engineering scaffolds due to its ability to produce nanoscale fibers which can mimic the geometry of extracellular tissues. Besides geometry, mechanical property is one of the main elements to be considered when developing tissue engineering scaffolds. In this study, the electrospinning process parameter settings were varied in order to find the optimum setting which can produce electrospun nanofibrous mats with good mechanical properties. Maghemite (γ-Fe 2 O 3 ) was mixed with poly(vinyl alcohol) and then electrospun to form nanofibers. The five input variable factors involved were nanoparticles content, voltage, flow rate, spinning distance, and rotating speed, while the response variable considered was Young’s modulus. The performance of electrospinning process was systematically screened and optimized using response surface methodology. This work truly demonstrated the sequential nature of designed experimentation. Additionally, the application of various designs of experiment techniques and concepts was also demonstrated. Results revealed that electrospun nanofibrous mats with maximum Young’s modulus (273.51 MPa) was obtained at optimum input settings: 9 v/v% nanoparticle content, 35 kV voltage, 2 mL/h volume flow rate, 8 cm spinning distance, and 3539 r/min of rotating speed. The model was verified successfully by performing confirmation experiments. The nanofibers characterization demonstrated that the nanoparticles were well dispersed inside the nanofibers, and it also showed that the presence of defects on the nanofibers can decrease their mechanical strength. The biocompatibility performance was also evaluated and it was proven that the presence of γ-Fe 2 O 3 enhanced the cell viability and cell growth rate. The developed poly(vinyl alcohol)/γ-Fe 2 O 3 electrospun nanofiber mat has a good potential for tissue engineering scaffolds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia

Institute of Bioproduct Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia

Faculty of Chemical & Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and Research Management Center, UTM

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.01510.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.015 ↗
2. 10.1002/jbm.a.3320210.1002/jbm.a.33202 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20110027510.1002/adfm.201100275 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.04610.1016/j.cej.2012.10.046 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10856-012-4669-410.1007/s10856-012-4669-4 ↗
6. 10.1177/088391151142401510.1177/0883911511424015 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.02310.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.023 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.03610.1016/j.carbpol.2011.03.036 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10856-012-4641-310.1007/s10856-012-4641-3 ↗
10. 10.1177/088391151141345010.1177/0883911511413450 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.030 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.011 ↗
13. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.119710.1089/ten.2006.12.1197 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.02110.1016/j.addr.2007.04.021 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.02210.1016/j.addr.2007.04.022 ↗
16. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.10110.1089/ten.2005.11.101 ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.845.98510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.845.985 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00838-X10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00838-X ↗
19. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00111-910.1016/S0924-0136(99)00111-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.02.00810.1016/j.msec.2015.02.008 ↗
21. 10.1177/095441191664963210.1177/0954411916649632 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.02910.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.029 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.06510.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.065 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.02610.1016/j.watres.2009.11.026 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.08.02610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.08.026 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.02110.1016/j.msec.2013.09.021 ↗
27. 10.1098/rsif.2012.083310.1098/rsif.2012.0833 ↗
28. 10.1039/c2ra22376g10.1039/c2ra22376g ↗
29. 10.1371/journal.pone.009158410.1371/journal.pone.0091584 ↗
30. Lanza R · 2011
31. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00271-X10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00271-X ↗
32. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00835-910.1016/S0924-0136(00)00835-9 ↗
33. 10.1080/0898211090339420510.1080/08982110903394205 ↗
34. Noordin MY · 299
35. Montgomery DC · 2008
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.016 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.06.00310.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.06.003 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00407-110.1016/S0142-9612(03)00407-1 ↗
39. Luo M · 101
40. 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90056-I10.1016/0109-5641(92)90056-I ↗
41. Montgomery DC · 2004 · 7
42. 10.1088/1742-6596/151/1/01203610.1088/1742-6596/151/1/012036 ↗
43. 10.1002/app.2111610.1002/app.21116 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.msec.2004.08.00910.1016/j.msec.2004.08.009 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00142-810.1016/S0142-9418(01)00142-8 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.03010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.030 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10924-004-1215-610.1007/s10924-004-1215-6 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0079-6700(02)00149-110.1016/S0079-6700(02)00149-1 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.003 ↗
50. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.049510.1089/ten.tea.2014.0495 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.00510.1016/j.addr.2009.07.005 ↗