journal article·2019-10-02Open access

Bioactive coating as a surface modification technique for biocompatible metallic implants: a review

B. Priyadarshini, M. Rama, Chetan, U. Vijayalakshmi

Abstract

Most high load-bearing implants are metallic alloys which contain toxic chemical components that might be released due to the corrosive environment of body fluids and load-bearing activity. Surface modification techniques do not guarantee biocompatibility. Hence, the bioactive surface of implants can be modified by coating the surface with a suitable material that addresses the needs of the patient. The choice and application process of the coatings should be determined based on the workability of the material and its physiochemical properties, such as the procedures involved and performance in avoiding removal of any desirable material properties that are helpful in the tissue regeneration process. Tailor-made coating materials prove very promising, as they might improve permanent implantations, make them more affordable and reduce the need for surgical revisions. The scope of the featured properties, such as addition of accelerated tissue regeneration, antibacterial properties and controlled release and removal of debris from the biological system to the metal implants makes coatings an ideal choice for surface modification of implants. This report reviews several options available for forming a biologically active layer over metallic surfaces that will interact with and produce desirable effects on host tissues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0024116510.1007/BF00241165 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.10210.1016/j.msec.2017.04.102 ↗
3. Park JB · 2000
4. 10.1179/1753555713Y.000000010910.1179/1753555713Y.0000000109 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11661-002-0109-210.1007/s11661-002-0109-2 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma512298110.3390/ma5122981 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.03710.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.037 ↗
8. Sivakumar M · J Mater Sci · 1994 · 13 · 142
9. 10.1002/maco.20080417310.1002/maco.200804173 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2004.11.00110.1016/j.actbio.2004.11.001 ↗
12. Davidson DL. Titanium alloys- Fatigue crack growth mechanisms and crack tip micromechanics. Microstructure/property relationships in titanium aluminides and alloys. In: Kim Y.W, Boyer RR, editors. San Antonio, Texas. The minerals, metals hand materials society; 1991. p. 447–461.
13. Inoue A · Le J Phys Colloques · 1980 · 41 · C8
14. 10.1038/s41529-017-0009-y10.1038/s41529-017-0009-y ↗
15. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-410.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4 ↗
16. Steinemann S · 1980 · 1 · 1
17. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00358-110.1016/S0142-9612(01)00358-1 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.03.01010.1016/j.electacta.2005.03.010 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.00810.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.008 ↗
20. 10.1002/jbm.82016060610.1002/jbm.820160606 ↗
21. 10.5006/0010-9312-34.4.13810.5006/0010-9312-34.4.138 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_610.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6 ↗
23. 10.3390/ijms15071187810.3390/ijms150711878 ↗
24. Marjan BN · Trends Biomater Artif Organs · 2010 · 24 · 69
25. 10.2174/187432500080201006610.2174/1874325000802010066 ↗
26. Muhammad H · Int J Health Sci (Qassium) · 2017 · 11 · 1
27. Talik NA · 2017 · 914 · 012032
28. Callister WD · 2000
29. 10.1023/A:101579392736410.1023/A:1015793927364 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-610.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6 ↗
32. Ramli RA · J Phys Sci · 2011 · 22 · 25
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.01210.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.012 ↗
34. 10.1016/0022-3913(78)90067-710.1016/0022-3913(78)90067-7 ↗
35. 10.1080/10426914.2015.107041510.1080/10426914.2015.1070415 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00195-310.1016/S0955-2219(00)00195-3 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.01.04210.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.01.042 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.01410.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.014 ↗
39. Hoffmann O · Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants · 2008 · 23 · 691
40. 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-0007910.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00079 ↗
41. Lai JC · Int J Nanomed · 2008 · 3 · 533
42. Zhang XQ · Biomed Environ Sci · 2011 · 24 · 661
43. Hou Y · Int J Nanomed · 2013 · 8 · 3619
44. 10.1002/jbm.82005061110.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00155-110.1016/S0022-3093(00)00155-1 ↗
46. 10.1023/A:100865320808310.1023/A:1008653208083 ↗
47. 10.1039/b007852m10.1039/b007852m ↗
48. Emami-Karvani Z · Afr J Microbiol Res · 2011 · 5 · 1368
49. Kolodziejczak-Radzimska A, Jesionowski T. Zinc oxide-from synthesis to application: a review,Materials (Basel). 2014;7:2833–2881.10.3390/ma7042833 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.08.05510.1016/j.electacta.2008.08.055 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.04.11110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.04.111 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.06.01010.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.06.010 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2007.03.00210.1016/j.ceramint.2007.03.002 ↗
54. 10.1177/002199830606732110.1177/0021998306067321 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10853-006-0556-z10.1007/s10853-006-0556-z ↗