Two-step-pressurization method in pulsed electric current sintering of MoO3 for production of 99mTc radioactive isotope
Source abstract
Abstract
Pulsed electric current sintering of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) was carried out by one- and two-step pressurization methods for fabrication of irradiation targets used in the production of 99Mo and 99mTc nuclear medicines. At 550°C by the two-step pressurization method, a relative density of 93.1% was obtained while, by the one-step pressurization method, the relative density was 76.9%. Direct sample temperature measurements were conducted by a thermocouple inserted in a punch. By the two-step pressurization method, the sample temperature was higher than that by the one-step pressurization method even at almost the same die temperature. From voltage and current waveforms, it was indicated that the conductivity of the sample increased by the two-step pressurization method to increase the sample temperature and the relative density. The two-step pressurization method allows us to prepare dense targets at a low temperature from recycled and coarse-grained 98Mo enriched MoO3 powder.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Extreme Energy-Density Research Institute, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan
Department of Nuclear System Safety Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan
Oarai Research and Development Institute, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 2013
2. 2013
3. Hetherington ELR · 1999
4. Nishikata K · JAEA-Technology · 2014
5. Nishikata K · 2013 · 8
6. 10.1007/s10967-014-3510-610.1007/s10967-014-3510-6 ↗
7. Tsuchiya K · 2013
8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385469-8.00060-510.1016/B978-0-12-385469-8.00060-5 ↗
9. Murayama N. what we can do by plused electric current sintering Ceramics Japan. 1997;32:445–449.
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01380.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01380.x ↗
11. 10.2320/jinstmet1952.63.7_91710.2320/jinstmet1952.63.7_917 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.016 ↗
13. Wang C · Mater. · 2009 · 61 · 193
14. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04274.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04274.x ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04145.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04145.x ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.11.02310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.11.023 ↗
17. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.09-047110.3891/acta.chem.scand.09-0471 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.170814510.1063/1.1708145 ↗
19. 10.2320/matertrans.M201805510.2320/matertrans.M2018055 ↗
20. 10.2497/jjspm.45.15310.2497/jjspm.45.153 ↗
21. Duwal S · J Phys Chem · 2018 · 122 · 22632
22. Tokita M · Mater Sci Soc Jpn · 2016 · 53 · 40
23. 10.1007/s10853-008-2906-510.1007/s10853-008-2906-5 ↗
24. 10.2497/jjspm.56.78010.2497/jjspm.56.780 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.calphad.2013.12.00610.1016/j.calphad.2013.12.006 ↗