journal article·2013-12Open access

Formulating the effects of concentration (x) and calcination temperature on the synthesis of Mn1−xZnxFe2O4 by using response surface methodology

A. Iqbal, K. Ali

Abstract

The effect of stoichiometric concentration (x) and calcination temperature on the lattice constant and particle size of Mn1−xZnxFe2O4 was investigated while using co-precipitation method to prepare nano-sized ferrite particles. Crystallographic studies were used to determine the lattice constant and particle size. The process variable values (concentration (x) and calcination temperature) for 13 runs were proposed using response surface methodology (RSM). Optimized values predicted by RSM for the concentration and calcination temperature were 0.74 and 996 °C respectively, for lattice constant 8.36625 Å and particle size 14.81 nm. The optimization of parameters by using RSM may be helpful in the synthesis low cost manganese zinc ferrite using the co-precipitation technique.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Pigment Synthesis and Properties · Iron oxide chemistry and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of AgricultureFaisalabad 38000Pakistan

Nano-Optoelectronics Research and Technology Laboratory, School of Physics, Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenang 11800Malaysia

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Jeyadevan B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 845010.1063/1.1543135 ↗
2. Zhenyu L. · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2007 · 2 · 4010.1007/s11671-006-9027-3 ↗
3. Mendelson M.I. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1976 · 59 · 21910.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb10937.x ↗
4. Foca-nici E. · Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. · 2012 · 51 · 17210.1007/s11106-012-9413-6 ↗
5. Kang Y.S. · ChemInform · 1997 · 28 · 2209
6. Song J. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 26 · 78710.1016/S1005-0302(10)60125-9 ↗
7. Lee Y. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 50310.1002/adfm.200400187 ↗
8. Waqas H. · Ceram. Int. · 2012 · 38 · 123510.1016/j.ceramint.2011.08.054 ↗
9. Jana N.R. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 393110.1021/cm049221k ↗
10. Angermann A. · Ceram. Int. · 2011 · 37 · 99510.1016/j.ceramint.2010.11.019 ↗
11. Salah L.M. · Ceram. Int. · 2012 · 38 · 560510.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.001 ↗
12. Dey S. · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2003 · 38 · 165310.1016/S0025-5408(03)00175-2 ↗
13. Desai R. · Pramana – J. Phys. · 2009 · 73 · 76510.1007/s12043-009-0144-2 ↗
14. D.C.MontgomeryDesign and Analysis of Experiments2001John Wiley and SonsNew York
15. R.H.MyersResponse Surface Methodology1971Allyn and BaconNew York
16. Gunaraj N.M.V. · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 1999 · 88 · 26610.1016/S0924-0136(98)00405-1 ↗
17. Hunter J.S. · Ann. Math. Stat. · 1957 · 28 · 19510.1214/aoms/1177707047 ↗
18. Hunter W.G. · J. Technometr. · 1961 · 3 · 311
19. Ali K. · Superlattice Microst. · 2012 · 52 · 78210.1016/j.spmi.2012.06.008 ↗
20. Rath C. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 221110.1063/1.1432474 ↗
21. Arunkumar N. · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2012 · 1