journal article·2021-07-03Open access

Synthesis of nanorod apatites with templates at critical micelle concentrations and in vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity

Ssu-Meng Haung, Jian-Chih Chen, Kai-Chi Chang, Chia-Ling Ko, Dan-Jae Lin, Wen-Cheng Chen

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the synthesis, cytotoxicity, and antimicrobial activity of nanorod apatites obtained using different surfactants at their critical micelle concentrations via hydrothermal method. Nanoscale apatite was obtained from ionic solutions without a template (nHA) compared with synthesized nanorod apatites of T-nHA, S-nHA, F-nHA and P-nHA with four different templates, i.e. the cationic/cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), anionic/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), nonionic/Pluronic F-127, and zwitterionic/cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) surfactants. Results showed that all of the synthesized apatites have a nanoscale rod-shaped morphology with bacteriostatic properties on day 1. However, only the nanorod apatite of T-nHA demonstrated long-term antibacterial activity up to day 14 due to the combined nanoscale-sized effects and surface phenomena. Among the nanorod apatites produced by the surfactant molecular geometry and solution conditions, the synthesized nanorod apatite of P-nHA possessed the smallest homogeneous crystals. Cytotoxicity results revealed that the nanorod apatites of nHA and F-nHA present insignificant cytotoxicity. Given its acceptable bacteriostatic effect and biocompatibility, the F-nHA may be considered better than nHA. Compared with the conventional-sized apatites, surfactant template-assisted nanorod apatite of T-nHA with high antimicrobial activity may be used as composite grafts for reconstructive surgery to improve inflammation that may be caused by bacteria.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Medical Devices and Composites Laboratory, Department of Fiber and Composite Materials, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medical School, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

School of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

Biomaterials Translational Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Fragrance and Cosmetic Science, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.00710.1016/j.cis.2017.04.007 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cossms.2003.10.00110.1016/j.cossms.2003.10.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.00110.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.02610.1016/j.msec.2018.04.026 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.09610.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.096 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.irbm.2010.04.00210.1016/j.irbm.2010.04.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.microc.2018.10.00710.1016/j.microc.2018.10.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apt.2018.03.02110.1016/j.apt.2018.03.021 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.05210.1016/j.msec.2016.01.052 ↗
10. 10.1080/21870764.2019.169923010.1080/21870764.2019.1699230 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.06410.1016/j.jcis.2005.02.064 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.06210.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.062 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.044 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.033 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02529.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02529.x ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.12.03510.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.12.035 ↗
17. 10.1093/toxsci/kfz01910.1093/toxsci/kfz019 ↗
18. 10.1155/2013/19485410.1155/2013/194854 ↗
19. 10.1186/s11671-015-1018-910.1186/s11671-015-1018-9 ↗
20. 10.1007/s41779-019-00307-910.1007/s41779-019-00307-9 ↗
21. 10.1111/jace.1307510.1111/jace.13075 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.01210.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.012 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.10310.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.103 ↗
24. Ma X · Mater Chem Phys · 2016 · 18 · 3220
25. 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.10.01110.1016/j.jmst.2013.10.011 ↗
26. 10.1001/archotol.1991.0187016003300410.1001/archotol.1991.01870160033004 ↗
27. 10.1002/jbm.a.3101710.1002/jbm.a.31017 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.16110.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.161 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.04.00110.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.04.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12785710.1016/j.matlet.2020.127857 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.12010.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.120 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.03.02310.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.03.023 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.07.07810.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.07.078 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.poly.2018.06.03110.1016/j.poly.2018.06.031 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.05.10310.1016/j.matlet.2013.05.103 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12251510.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122515 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.01310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.013 ↗
38. 10.1080/21870764.2019.163692810.1080/21870764.2019.1636928 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2007.08.00810.1016/j.materresbull.2007.08.008 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.09010.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.090 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10584110.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105841 ↗
42. 10.1039/C7CE01871A10.1039/C7CE01871A ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cocis.2017.10.00210.1016/j.cocis.2017.10.002 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.03410.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.034 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jdsr.2015.03.00410.1016/j.jdsr.2015.03.004 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.09810.1016/j.msec.2019.01.098 ↗
47. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04912.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04912.x ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.01.01310.1016/j.ejpb.2020.01.013 ↗
49. 10.1002/mabi.20120001710.1002/mabi.201200017 ↗
50. 10.1007/s00204-012-0827-110.1007/s00204-012-0827-1 ↗