In vitro bioactivity of 3D Ti-mesh with bioceramic coatings in simulated body fluid
Source abstract
Abstract
3D Ti-mesh has been coated with bioceramics under different coating conditions, such as material compositions and micro-porosity, using a dip casting method. Hydroxyapatite (HA), micro-HA particles (HAp), a bioglass (BG) and their different mixtures together with polymer additives were used to control HA-coating microstructures. Layered composites with the following coating-to-substrate designs, such as BG/Ti, HA + BG/BG/Ti and HAp + BG/BG/Ti, were fabricated. The bioactivity of these coated composites and the uncoated Ti-mesh substrate was then investigated in a simulated body fluid (SBF). The Ti-mesh substrate and BG/Ti composite did not induce biomimetic apatite deposition when they were immersed in SBF for the selected BG, a pressable dental ceramic, used in this study. After seven days in SBF, an apatite layer was formed on both HA + BG/BG/Ti and HAp + BG/BG/Ti composites. The difference is the apatite layer on the HAp + BG/BG/Ti composite was rougher and contained more micro-pores, while the apatite layer on the HA + BG/BG/Ti composite was dense and smooth. The formation of biomimetic apatite, being more bioresorbable, is favored for bone regeneration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern UniversityShenyang 110819China
School of Science, Northeastern UniversityShenyang 110819China
School of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, The University of Western AustraliaPerth 6009Australia
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Australian Research Council's Discovery Project · China Scholarship Council · UWA
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Geetha M. · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 54 · 39710.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
2. Zhang L.C. · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 2110.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.024 ↗
3. Porter J.R. · Biotechnol. Progr. · 2009 · 25 · 153910.1002/btpr.246 ↗
4. Kim H.-W. · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 253310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.041 ↗
5. Stanton K. · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2009 · 20 · 85110.1007/s10856-008-3650-8 ↗
6. Hench L.L. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1991 · 74 · 148710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
7. Ning C.Q. · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 337910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.017 ↗
8. Xiu Z.M. · Adv. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 41 · 4110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.41-42.41 ↗
9. Tsui Y.C. · Biomaterials · 1998 · 19 · 201510.1016/S0142-9612(98)00103-3 ↗
10. Zheng X. · Biomaterials · 2000 · 21 · 84110.1016/S0142-9612(99)00255-0 ↗
11. Yang Y. · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 32710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.029 ↗
12. Milella E. · Biomaterials · 2001 · 22 · 142510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00300-8 ↗
13. Kim H.-W. · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 335110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.104 ↗
14. Yi W. · Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. · 2013 · 1
15. Karageorgiou V. · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 547410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
16. Jones A.C. · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 249110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.046 ↗
17. Kokubo T. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1990 · 24 · 72110.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
18. Kokubo T. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 290710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
19. Jiang B. · Mater. Lett. · 2013 · 109 · 6610.1016/j.matlet.2013.07.056 ↗
20. Yi W. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2013 · 96 · 366210.1111/jace.12581 ↗
21. Huang J. · Acta Biomater. · 2010 · 6 · 24110.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.032 ↗
22. Demnati I. · Biomed. Mater. · 2012 · 7 · 110.1088/1748-6041/7/5/054101 ↗
23. Maeda H. · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 121610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.010 ↗