The Effect of Material Modeling on Finite Element Analysis of Human Breast Biomechanics
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose Finite element analysis has been used extensively in the study of biomechanical modeling of the breast. However, issues regarding the complexity of material models and the influences of geometric boundary conditions on the accuracy of a breast Finite Element (FE) model are still under debate. This work demonstrates the importance of material modeling in FE models of the breast. Methods A simple hemispherical geometry is used to model the shape of a human breast. Different material models are being investigated to accurately model changes in terms of displacement, stress, and reaction forces distribution. Results The results obtained using nonlinear material models are compared with those obtained employing their linear approximation. Results have shown that differences, in terms of displacement, ranging between 20% and more than 80%, may occur and that large differences are present in terms of maximum principal stresses when the displacement is correctly approximated. Conclusions This study clearly shows that, in a FE model, simulating large deformations material modeling strongly influences the accuracy of the solution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Breast Implant and Reconstruction · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanics of Materials and Constructions (MeMC), Vrije Univeristeit Brussel, Brussels - Belgium
Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels - Belgium
Lymphedema and Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (LYMF-KINE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels - Belgium
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.01810.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.018 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-3-540-70658-8_2110.1007/978-3-540-70658-8_21 ↗
3. 10.1098/rstb.2003.134510.1098/rstb.2003.1345 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.01.00510.1016/j.medengphy.2008.01.005 ↗
5. Carter T.J. · Br J Radiol · 2004 · 77 · 14010.1259/bjr/25329214 ↗
6. 10.1118/1.219831510.1118/1.2198315 ↗
7. 10.1109/TMI.2002.80836710.1109/TMI.2002.808367 ↗
8. Ruiter N.V. · 2003
9. Bakic P.R. · 2000
10. WellmanP.S. Tactile Imaging. PhD Thesis 1999; Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Cambridge, Harvard University: 137.
11. 10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/00210.1088/0031-9155/52/6/002 ↗
12. 10.1109/TBME.2007.89349310.1109/TBME.2007.893493 ↗
13. Chung J.H. · Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv · 2008 · 758
14. Gerhard A. · 2004
15. 10.1259/bjr.72.855.1039621210.1259/bjr.72.855.10396212 ↗
16. 10.1097/01.RLI.0000059544.18910.BD10.1097/01.RLI.0000059544.18910.BD ↗
17. 10.1093/imammb/dqm00610.1093/imammb/dqm006 ↗
18. Goodier J.N. · 1951
19. Simulia. Abaqus Analysis User's Manual 2007.
20. 10.1016/0021-9290(70)90055-210.1016/0021-9290(70)90055-2 ↗
21. 1996