Evaluation of the light transmission of chairside polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramics in different shades and thicknesses
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the amount of polymerizing light passing through hybrid ceramic specimens in different shades and thicknesses. Methods: Rectangular-shaped feldspathic ceramic computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) blocks and translucent and high translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic CAD-CAM blocks in four different shades (1M1, 1M2, 2M2, and 3M2) were sectioned in four different thicknesses (0.8, 1.5, 2, and 3 mm), and a total of 48 groups ( n = 10) were obtained. Feldspathic ceramic specimens served as the control group. The light transmission of each ceramic specimen was measured three times by using a light-emitting diode and a radiometer. Data were statistically analyzed by using univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by one-way ANOVA, Tukey honest significant difference, and Tamhane T2 tests (α = 0.05). Results: Translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic specimens exhibited significantly ( p < 0.001) lower light transmission values than high translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic and feldspathic ceramic specimens, whereas feldspathic ceramic specimens exhibited significantly ( p < 0.001) higher light transmission than translucent and high translucent polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic specimens. The amount of light transmission significantly ( p < 0.05) decreased when the shade value decreased and the thickness increased. Conclusions: Polymer infiltrated hybrid ceramic specimens showed lower light transmission values than feldspathic ceramic specimens, and the amount of light transmission was affected by the ceramic shade and thickness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Marocho SM · J Adhes Dent · 2013 · 15 · 361
2. 10.1067/mpr.2003.5010.1067/mpr.2003.50 ↗
3. 10.1590/0103-644020130035410.1590/0103-6440201300354 ↗
4. 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90293-W10.1016/0022-3913(93)90293-W ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.00610.1016/j.dental.2007.11.006 ↗
6. 10.2334/josnusd.50.13110.2334/josnusd.50.131 ↗
7. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12679410.1067/mpr.2002.126794 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.01110.1016/j.cden.2011.01.011 ↗
9. 10.2341/10-206-L10.2341/10-206-L ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.00710.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.007 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.01910.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.019 ↗
12. 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.020010.14219/jada.archive.2002.0200 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.02510.1016/j.dental.2006.11.025 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.01410.1016/j.dental.2012.11.014 ↗
15. Barghi N · Compend Contin Educ Dent · 2003 · 24 · 497
16. Kanca J. · Quintessence Int · 1986 · 17 · 809
17. 10.4012/dmj.28.4410.4012/dmj.28.44 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.00810.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.008 ↗
19. 10.11607/ijp.424410.11607/ijp.4244 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40496-016-0102-210.1007/s40496-016-0102-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.01610.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016 ↗
22. 10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.26410.17796/1053-4628-40.4.264 ↗
23. 10.1111/jerd.1217410.1111/jerd.12174 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.01910.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.00210.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002 ↗
26. 10.2341/15-252-L10.2341/15-252-L ↗
27. Egilmez F · J Adhes Dent · 2017 · 19 · 39
28. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.00310.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004 ↗
30. 10.1111/jerd.1219510.1111/jerd.12195 ↗
31. 10.1111/jerd.1216610.1111/jerd.12166 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60131-X10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60131-X ↗