Incorporation of MXene into brushite cement: Effects on mechanical, physical, and biological properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective: Brushite cement (BrC) has been extensively utilized in hard tissue engineering implementations due to their osteoconductive and bioresorbable nature. The key limitations associated with the clinical application of brushite cement are complex handling procedures, short working time, and inadequate mechanical strength. This study investigates the development of MXene-incorporated brushite cement with improved properties for various clinical applications. The objective was to evaluate the influence of MXene concentration on the mechanical, physical and biological properties of BrC. Method: The incorporated MXene at 1% and 2% concentrations were evaluated for characterization by SEM, EDX, XRD, FTIR, mechanical strength by UTM, physical properties by degradation and setting time, and biologically by DDT, DCT, cytotoxicity and gene expression. Results: MXene inclusion increased the crystallinity of BrC, mechanical strength (SBS, CS and BFS), significantly ( p < 0.05) particularly at 2 wt.%. The prolonged setting times, enhanced antibacterial property (ZOI 20.5 mm in DDT; 1.20 OD prior and 0.05 OD after the test in DCT), and acceptable cytocompatibility around 75% cell viability. Significant upregulation of RUNX2, ALP and OCN in the 2% group. Conclusion: Inclusion of MXene into brushite cement generated a composite biomaterial with improved mechanical strength, controlled degradation, strengthened antibacterial activity, while maintained biocompatibility. Exhibits potential for clinical applications requiring enhanced regenerative ability and antibacterial performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Biomedical Materials, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore, Pakistan
Department of Oral Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
Funding
khyber medical university
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/BOT.000000000000111510.1097/BOT.0000000000001115 ↗
2. 10.1186/s40001-021-00593-910.1186/s40001-021-00593-9 ↗
3. 10.1097/BOT.000000000000142010.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.04310.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.00710.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0019410.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00194 ↗
7. 10.1002/adhm.20170061210.1002/adhm.201700612 ↗
8. 10.3390/ijms22191023310.3390/ijms221910233 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.03010.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.00110.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.001 ↗
11. Zhao F, Yang Z, Liu L, et al. Design and evaluation of a novel sub-scaffold dental implant system based on the osteoinduction of micro-nano bioactive glass. Biomater Transl 2020; 1(1): 82.
12. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17<3130::AID-ANIE3130>3.0.CO;2-110.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17<3130::AID-ANIE3130>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-008-2527-z10.1007/s10853-008-2527-z ↗
14. 10.3390/ma201022110.3390/ma2010221 ↗
15. 10.1039/b706411j10.1039/b706411j ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.07310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.073 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.03010.1016/j.injury.2017.10.030 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.00510.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.005 ↗
19. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ba46d310.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ba46d3 ↗
20. 10.3171/2013.6.JNS136010.3171/2013.6.JNS1360 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08746.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08746.x ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.b.3088110.1002/jbm.b.30881 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.02410.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.024 ↗
24. 10.1002/adhm.20180113710.1002/adhm.201801137 ↗
25. Lin H Chen Y Shi JJAS. Insights into 2D MXenes for versatile biomedical applications: current advances and challenges ahead. 2018; 5(10): 1800518.10.1002/advs.201800518 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20170698110.1002/adma.201706981 ↗
27. Pan S Yin J Yu L et al. 2D MXene-integrated 3D-printing scaffolds for augmented osteosarcoma phototherapy and accelerated tissue reconstruction. 2020; 7(2): 1901511.10.1002/advs.201901511 ↗
28. Fu Y Zhang J Lin H et al. 2D titanium carbide (MXene) nanosheets and 1D hydroxyapatite nanowires into free standing nanocomposite membrane: in vitro and in vivo evaluations for bone regeneration. 2021; 118: 111367.10.1016/j.msec.2020.111367 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.01110.1016/j.dental.2011.02.011 ↗
30. 10.3390/jfb1301001810.3390/jfb13010018 ↗
31. 10.1098/rsif.2016.105710.1098/rsif.2016.1057 ↗
32. Rashid A, Manjula S, Younis M. Evaluation of push out bond strength of two calcium silicate based cements with bone cement in retrograde cavities prepared by ultrasonic retro tips. Int J Contemp Med Res 2019; 6: 18–20.
33. 10.1590/S1806-8324200800010001510.1590/S1806-83242008000100015 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.02810.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.028 ↗
35. Standard A. F394-78: standard test method for biaxial strength (modulus of rupture) of ceramic substrates. ASTM International, 1996.
36. Yang J, Zhang K, Zhang S, et al. Preparation of calcium phosphate cement and polymethyl methacrylate for biological composite bone cements. Med Sci Monitor Int Med J Exper Clin Res 2015; 21: 1162.
37. Tanomaru-Filho M, Morales V, da Silva GF, et al. Compressive strength and setting time of MTA and Portland cement associated with different radiopacifying agents. Int Scholar Res Notices 2012; 1(1): 898051.
38. Nasrollahi N, Nourian Dehkordi A, Jamshidizad A, et al. Preparation of brushite cements with improved properties by adding graphene oxide. Int J Nanomed 2019: 3785–3797.
39. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.00110.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.001 ↗
40. ASTM C, editor 266-99. Standard test method for time of setting of hydraulic-cement paste by Gillmore needles. American Society for Testing and Materials, 1999.
41. Fazal H, Ahmad N, Ullah I, et al. Antibacterial potential in Parthenium hysterophorus, Stevia rebaudiana and Ginkgo biloba. Pak J Bot 2011; 43(2): 1307–1313.
42. Anumula L, Kumar S, Kumar VS, et al. An assessment of antibacterial activity of four endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a direct contact test: an in vitro study. Int Scholar Res Notices 2012; 1(1): 989781.
43. 10.3390/jcs708034310.3390/jcs7080343 ↗
44. ISO I. 10993-5: 2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices—part 5: tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization, 2009; p. 34.
45. 10.1017/S096719942300053910.1017/S0967199423000539 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10856-012-4740-110.1007/s10856-012-4740-1 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10853-016-0017-210.1007/s10853-016-0017-2 ↗
48. 10.3390/mi1505063310.3390/mi15050633 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0153610.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01536 ↗
50. 10.2147/IJN.S22783010.2147/IJN.S227830 ↗
51. 10.1038/nmat201310.1038/nmat2013 ↗
52. 10.1039/b923857n10.1039/b923857n ↗
53. 10.1002/app.4862110.1002/app.48621 ↗
54. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70014-610.1016/S1369-7021(10)70014-6 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0835710.1021/acsnano.0c08357 ↗
56. 10.1021/ja500506k10.1021/ja500506k ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.16810.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.168 ↗
58. 10.3390/ma1404082910.3390/ma14040829 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.flatc.2019.10012810.1016/j.flatc.2019.100128 ↗
60. 10.3390/nano1308138310.3390/nano13081383 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.036 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.00510.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.005 ↗
63. 10.1155/2015/43057810.1155/2015/430578 ↗
64. 10.1201/9781003306511-3510.1201/9781003306511-35 ↗
65. 10.1007/978-3-319-56059-5_410.1007/978-3-319-56059-5_4 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.04010.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.040 ↗
67. 10.3390/cryst1403022210.3390/cryst14030222 ↗
68. Giocondi JL, El-Dasher BS, Nancollas GH, et al. Molecular mechanisms of crystallization impacting calcium phosphate cements. Philos Trans Royal Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2010; 368(1917): 1937–1961.
69. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10866310.1016/j.jece.2022.108663 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.inoche.2024.11321410.1016/j.inoche.2024.113214 ↗
71. 10.1089/scd.2012.069310.1089/scd.2012.0693 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.07310.1016/j.msec.2019.02.073 ↗
73. 10.1371/journal.pone.011740210.1371/journal.pone.0117402 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.02510.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.025 ↗
75. 10.1002/jbm.b.3362510.1002/jbm.b.33625 ↗
76. Cui D, Kong N, Ding L, et al. Ultrathin 2D titanium carbide MXene (Ti3C2Tx) nanoflakes activate WNT/HIF-1α-mediated metabolism reprogramming for periodontal regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater 2021; 10(22): 2101215.
77. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.02910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.029 ↗
78. 10.1038/boneres.2017.1410.1038/boneres.2017.14 ↗
79. 10.1039/c3tb20945h10.1039/c3tb20945h ↗
80. 10.2147/IJN.S9034310.2147/IJN.S90343 ↗
81. 10.1002/jbm.b.3530210.1002/jbm.b.35302 ↗