The effect of coffee and whitening systems on surface roughness and gloss of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass cermaics
Source abstract
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the effects of a coffee beverage and two whitening systems on the surface roughness and gloss of glazed Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramics (LDGC) for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems. Methods: Sixty-eight LDGC disks (12 × 10 × 2 mm) were prepared from blocks of CAD/CAM systems (IPS e.max CAD ceramic). Baseline measurements for surface roughness (Ra) and gloss (GU) were taken using a 3-D optical profilometer and a glossmeter, respectively; then specimens were randomized into four groups ( n = 17). All specimens were immersed in a coffee solution (24 h × 12 days) then subjected to two whitening systems. G1-negative control (kept moist × 7 days); G2-positive control (brushed with distilled water, 200 g/load, 2 min twice daily × 7 days); G3-whitening toothpaste (Colgate optic white; relative dentin abrasivity (RDA) = 100, 200 g/load, 2 min twice daily × 7 days); and G4-simulated at-home bleaching protocol (Opalescence,15% carbamide peroxide (CP), 6 h/day × 7 days). The study outcomes were measured at baseline and after the treatments. Data were analyzed using paired T-test and one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results: The mean surface roughness significantly increased ( p ⩽ 0.002) for all groups after the designated treatment protocols. Among groups, the mean surface roughness of G2 and G3 were significantly higher ( p ⩽ 0.001) (Ra: 0.51 and 0.57 μm, respectively) compared to the control group (Ra: 0.23 μm), and were not significantly different from G4 (Ra: 0.46 μm). Surface gloss decreased with no significant change within or among groups after treatment. Conclusion: All glazed LDGC had a significant increase in surface roughness after being subjected to simulated 1 year of coffee drinking and whitening systems (15% CP and whitening toothpaste), and the greatest change was associated with brushing (simulating 8 months). However, coffee beverages and whitening systems had no significant effect on the surface gloss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Department of Prosthodontics, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002203451987545010.1177/0022034519875450 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.01110.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011 ↗
3. 10.1590/0103-644020190210110.1590/0103-6440201902101 ↗
4. 10.2341/15-174-L10.2341/15-174-L ↗
5. Vieira AC · J Indian Prosthodont Soc · 2013 · 13 · 290
6. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.03110.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.031 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.01510.1016/j.dental.2018.05.015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.001 ↗
10. Azevedo SM · Gen Dent · 2012 · 60
11. Firouz F · Front Dent · 2019 · 16 · 296
12. 10.1111/jopr.1271610.1111/jopr.12716 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.00310.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.003 ↗
14. 10.1111/jerd.1260410.1111/jerd.12604 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1207115810.3390/ma12071158 ↗
16. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11609:2017—dentistry–dentifrices–requirements, test methods and marking, https://www.iso.org/standard/70956.html (2017, accessed 11 September 2017).
17. 10.2334/josnusd.56.1110.2334/josnusd.56.11 ↗
18. ISO-Standards · 1999
19. 10.1111/jopr.1323210.1111/jopr.13232 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.00510.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.01510.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.015 ↗
22. 10.1111/jopr.1266310.1111/jopr.12663 ↗
23. 10.1177/0022034596075006130110.1177/00220345960750061301 ↗
24. Pantić M · Tribol Ind · 2015 · 37 · 391
25. Al-Angari SS · J Int Dent Med Res · 2020 · 13 · 979
26. 10.1111/jerd.1216610.1111/jerd.12166 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-310.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
28. 10.1038/sj.bdj.481088110.1038/sj.bdj.4810881 ↗
29. 10.1111/eos.1267610.1111/eos.12676 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.01310.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.013 ↗
31. Anil N · Int J Prosthodont · 2002 · 15 · 483
32. 10.1111/jopr.1313410.1111/jopr.13134 ↗
33. 10.1111/jerd.1246910.1111/jerd.12469 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00784-005-0016-110.1007/s00784-005-0016-1 ↗
35. 10.1155/2020/186429810.1155/2020/1864298 ↗
36. Kamala K · J Indian Prosthodont Soc · 2014 · 112 · 306
37. 10.1111/jopr.1265310.1111/jopr.12653 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.15210.1016/j.dental.2009.11.152 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.01810.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018 ↗
40. 10.2334/josnusd.55.910.2334/josnusd.55.9 ↗