journal article·2016-04

In Situ Development of Nanosilver-Impregnated Bacterial Cellulose for Sustainable Released Antimicrobial Wound Dressing

Bhavana V. Mohite, Satish V. Patil

Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose Bacterial cellulose (BC) is an interesting biomaterial found application in various fields due to its novel characteristics like purity, water holding capacity, degree of polymerization and mechanical strength. BC as wound dressing material has limitation because it has no antimicrobial activity. To circumvent this problem, the present study was carried out by impregnation of silver on bacterial cellulose surface. Methods Bacterial cellulose was produced by Gluconoacetobacter hansenii (strain NCIM 2529) by shaking culture method. The sodium borohydride and classical Tollens reaction was used for silver nanoparticle synthesis. Results The effectiveness of sodium borohydride method compared with Tollens reaction was evaluated on the basis of silver nanoparticle formation and its impregnation on BC as evidenced by UV-Vis spectrum analysis, FE-SEM-EDS analysis and FT-IR spectrum. The potential of nano silver impregnated BC was determined for sustained release antimicrobial wound dressing material by swelling ratio, mechanical properties and antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusions Thus the nanosilver impregnated bacterial cellulose as promising antimicrobial wound dressing material was evidenced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Wound Healing and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Life Sciences, North Maharashtra University, Jalagoan, Maharastra - India

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00417-910.1016/S0927-7757(00)00417-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90301-210.1016/S0195-6701(98)90301-2 ↗
3. 10.1023/B:CELL.0000046412.11983.6110.1023/B:CELL.0000046412.11983.61 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-110.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1 ↗
5. 10.1021/bm060620d10.1021/bm060620d ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.01110.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.011 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.07.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2007.07.025 ↗
8. 10.1163/156856209X41218210.1163/156856209X412182 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.00710.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.burns.2006.06.01010.1016/j.burns.2006.06.010 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01139-610.1016/S0167-7799(97)01139-6 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0956-5663(02)00212-910.1016/S0956-5663(02)00212-9 ↗
13. 10.3109/1040841910911520710.3109/10408419109115207 ↗
14. 10.1590/S0104-1428201000500000110.1590/S0104-14282010005000001 ↗
15. Dobre LM · U P B Sci Bull, Series B · 2010 · 72 · 55
16. 10.1007/s10570-012-9760-y10.1007/s10570-012-9760-y ↗
17. 10.1016/S1389-1723(04)70162-010.1016/S1389-1723(04)70162-0 ↗
18. Kirby WMM · Antibiot Annu · 1956 · 892 · 892
19. Sonnichsen C · New Journal of Physics · 2002 · 4 · 93.1
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.03810.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.038 ↗
21. Mohite BV · hansenii NCIM 2529. Carbohydr Polym · 2014 · 106 · 132
22. Kim YH · Materials Research Society · 2004 · 820 · 161
23. 10.1007/BF0113903210.1007/BF01139032 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:100477522914910.1023/A:1004775229149 ↗