journal article·2025-04Open access

Comparison of pull-out bond strength and microleakage of lithium disilicate onlay with and without immediate dentin sealing

Aruna Krishnan, Nishitha Arun, Mohammad Fareed, Nisha Manila, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari

Abstract

Background: Effective adhesion between dentin and resin materials is essential for the long-term durability of onlays, as the strength and durability of the tooth-restoration complex hinge on reliable adhesion. This study aims to enhance the adhesion of lithium disilicate onlays by employing immediate dentin sealing (IDS) and evaluates its effectiveness by comparing pull-out bond strength and microleakage with and without IDS. Methods: Extracted human premolars were prepared and categorized into two distinct groups: Group A (with IDS) and Group B (without IDS). In Group A, the dentin surfaces were sealed immediately after tooth preparation using an adhesive resin. In Group B, no sealing was performed before bonding the lithium disilicate restorations. Pull-out bond strength was assessed utilizing universal testing machine. Microleakage was evaluated through dye penetration analysis after thermocycling and sectioning of the samples. For statistical interpretation, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was applied. Results: The pull-out bond strength was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B ( p = 0.0001). Microleakage evaluation revealed less dye penetration in Group A, indicating superior marginal integrity with IDS. The high-resolution images provided clearer visualization of the interfaces and the extent of dye penetration. Conclusion: Immediate dentin sealing significantly enhances the pull-out bond strength of lithium disilicate onlay and reduces microleakage. These findings suggest that IDS is a beneficial step in the bonding protocol for lithium disilicate restorations, potentially improving the longevity and performance of the restorations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Diriyah, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Department of Clinical Radiology, California North State University College of Dental Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA

Department of Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconcini S, Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: a 3-year study. Quintessence Int 2008; 39(1): 65–71.
2. 10.2341/05-13210.2341/05-132 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-010.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-0 ↗
4. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22(3): 503–509.
5. 10.11607/ijp.322110.11607/ijp.3221 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01952.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01952.x ↗
7. Stappert CFJ, Guess PC, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance. Am J Dent 2007; 20(1): 21–26.
8. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent 2015; 10(3): 392–413.
9. 10.4012/dmj.2011-21710.4012/dmj.2011-217 ↗
10. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, et al. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992; 17(1): 13–20.
11. Magne P Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: A biomimetic approach. Batavia IL: Quintessence Publishing (IL) 2002. pp.414. https://books.google.com/books/about/Bonded_Porcelain_Restorations_in_the_Ant.html?hl=&id=l09qAAAAMAAJ
12. 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00371.x10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00371.x ↗
13. 10.1177/0022034594073005090110.1177/00220345940730050901 ↗
14. 10.1111/jerd.1238410.1111/jerd.12384 ↗
15. 10.61872/sdj-2022-07-08-87710.61872/sdj-2022-07-08-877 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.01010.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010 ↗
17. 10.2334/josnusd.22-014710.2334/josnusd.22-0147 ↗
18. 10.2341/18-052-L10.2341/18-052-L ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x ↗
20. Paul SJ, Schärer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17(6): 536–545.
21. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995; 105(3): 299–305.
22. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12(2): 111–121.
23. 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00748.x10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00748.x ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00775.x10.1111/j.1708-8240.1993.tb00775.x ↗
26. 10.1111/jerd.1270010.1111/jerd.12700 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1520707110.3390/ma15207071 ↗
28. 10.2341/12-307-L10.2341/12-307-L ↗
29. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28(3): 215–235.
30. 10.1177/15440591040830060410.1177/154405910408300604 ↗
31. 10.1177/15440591060850101410.1177/154405910608501014 ↗
32. 10.2341/14-055-L10.2341/14-055-L ↗
33. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.00810.1016/j.dental.2008.09.008 ↗
34. 10.1177/0022034592071011140110.1177/00220345920710111401 ↗
35. Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012; 25(3): 153–158.
36. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.01610.1016/j.dental.2010.03.016 ↗
37. 10.1177/002203451037288510.1177/0022034510372885 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbm.b.3153510.1002/jbm.b.31535 ↗
39. Suganna M, Kausher H, Tarek Ahmed S, et al. Contemporary evidence of CAD-CAM in dentistry: a systematic review. Cureus 2022; 14(11): e31687.